Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Айтишный Рок-н-Ролл

@it_krasavchik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,841subscribers

+144 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002286597635
TypeChannel
Username@it_krasavchik
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/it_krasavchik

Growth

4,6974,8414,7697 August 2026 — 4,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,699 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,767 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,841 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 5 days, net +144. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,675–4,863 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:594,841+74
10 Aug 2026, 07:324,767+68
7 Aug 2026, 17:344,699+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:014,697no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:584,697first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.6%
avg views ÷ 4,841 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,830
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held26 (3 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total73,700
Reactions total2,005
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,005 reactions across 26 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁76638.2%
🔥48023.9%
40820.3%
👍2009.98%
🙏502.49%
🕊190.948%
🤯190.948%
❤‍🔥150.748%
🥰120.599%
🫡80.399%
🤮60.299%
🤣50.249%
👏40.2%
🤔30.15%
🏆20.1%
💅20.1%
10.05%
🗿10.05%
😎10.05%
😱10.05%
2 further kinds20.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,005reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 26 we hold a reading for · 46%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @it_krasavchik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.85%
1 of 26 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,970
over 25 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VfnxxQaUzP13 August 20263 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈2,040 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я уже в третьей своей компании встречаю GPT-like поиск внутри, сделанный через Glean Примерно так же, как до этого в 7-й раз встретился с Okta, а до этого в 5-й с ArgoCD У вас оно тоже есть?

👍105

10 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈2,410 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я ж не показал то самое письмо. в котором отказался от оффера на $10к 🤦 Называется "почувствуй себя рекрутером, отказывающим кандидату" 🙅‍♂️ Но в этом нет вообще ничего приятного 😞 Наоборот, чувствуешь себя максимально не удобно 🫠 И хорошо, что от компании пришел именно такой ответ 🙏❤️

23👍7🔥6

10 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈2,470 views80 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ну хоть кто-то со мной согласен, что надо давать возможность работать в Anthropic / OpenAI не только из Сан-Франциско... Но и удаленно из Мошонок Калужской области 😉 Помечтали? А теперь вернулись в реальность и поставили в LinkedIn Португалию 😁

😁72🤮6👍2

10 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,440 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Бэкграунд чек не всегда проходит на 100% гладко 🤷 Я тут недавно писал, что вместо контактов в компаниях можно предоставить скрины контрактов... Но иногда их не хватает и референсы все равно просят 😕 Возможно потому что компания обязана соответствовать ISO стандартам 📝 А может просто потому что там русскоязычная команда 😉 В любом случае я уже их дропнул - просто команда бг чека еще не в курсе, а так бы пришлось ш

😁32🔥4🥰2

10 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈2,480 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я сегодня пока настраивал свой корп. аккаунт уже раз 5 позвонил в IT саппорт компании, который само собой находится на в РФ 😉 И здесь сильно пригодилось приложение Fanytel - арендовал английскую симку и вперед - работают и входящие, и исходящие 🔥 С другой симки стоимость была $3 за минуту 😱 Не реклама. Попробовал - работает - делюсь ❤️

31🔥24👍6

10 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC≈2,560 views47 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Утренний блок новостей от красавчика завершается наблюдением по типографическому тире... Которое раньше было знаком качества твоего текста, а теперь я точно знаю, что чувак сгенерил гитхаб коммент нейронкой 😁 Хотя компания как раз поощряет AI интеграцию во все процессы - так что реплейсить его на дефис больше не надо 🤷

😁42🥰5

10 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈2,570 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Доставить ноутбук из Армении во Францию DHL-ом стоит порядка 500+ евро со всеми пошлинами. Прошло 10 дней с тех пор, как я его дропнул в Ереванском офисе... А компания почему-то до сих пор не оплатила инвойс 🤷 Дорого что ли? 🤔

11👍3😁1

10 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈2,590 views95 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Первый день контракта на $20к ☀️ Бэкграунд чек еще не закончен, но работа ждать не будет 🤷‍♂️ Агентство пожелало удачи и напомнило про персонального консультанта, доступного в любое время 😁 Прям почувствовал себя VIP-гофером 😎 Ладно, хватит болтать, пора херачить! 💪 Хорошего вам понедельника! ❤️

70👍24🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC≈2,830 views66 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, это первый оффер на $10к+, от которого придется отказаться 🤯 Хотя я всегда рекомендую дать компании испыталку на пару недель 💯 И, если ожидания не соответствуют реальности, дропнуть с причиной "получил x2 оффер от Антропика". Проблема в том, что x2 оффер я действительно получил 🤷 И выходить надо прямо в тот же день 😱 А мне уже не 20 лет 🏖 Зато прошел у них бэкграунд чек без Армянского ВНЖ - причем в Li

👍41🔥159🤔1

7 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈2,990 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Практический гайд по валютной удаленке 2026 в двух частях (в коллабе с Александром @youareageek) - уже на ютубе! 🔥💪 Под видео сможете найти ссылку на ноушен со всей полезной информацией из видео. Приятного просмотра! ❤️ https://youtu.be/IdNkGSYOvqo - часть первая https://youtu.be/OFk35cQPvZQ - часть вторая

🔥6016👍8🥱1

7 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈2,930 views102 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Прикольно, когда в новой компании тебе дают таску на интеграцию с апишкой предыдущей 😁 Причем уже как минимум второй раз 🤷‍♂️ Тоже самое было при переходе из Delivery Hero как раз в Checkout 😎 Круче может быть, только если ты работаешь в двух компаниях одновременно 😉

😁83👍8🔥83

7 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC≈3,070 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В моей новой компании заеб.лись платить за Claude Enterprise и тупо переводят всех на Claude Max через персональные виртуальные карты 😁 Ламбу через нее покупать пока не пробовал 😉

😁56🔥32

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @it_krasavchik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 906,308 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Айтишный Рок-н-Ролл” (@it_krasavchik), 4,841 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/it_krasavchik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.