Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌹Посижу,почитаю|Добрые рассказы❤️Истории

Channel

🌹Посижу,почитаю|Добрые рассказы❤️Истории

@istoriyaposigu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,981subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002154990572
TypeChannel
Username@istoriyaposigu
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/istoriyaposigu

Growth

8,9819,0679,0247 August 2026 — 9,056 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,056 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,067 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,059 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,064 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,051 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,047 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,008 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,981 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,968–9,080 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 10:358,981-27
27 Aug 2026, 09:349,008-39
24 Aug 2026, 07:579,047-4
20 Aug 2026, 21:239,051-13
17 Aug 2026, 11:269,064+5
13 Aug 2026, 16:189,059-8
10 Aug 2026, 17:189,067+11
7 Aug 2026, 18:319,056no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:209,056first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.98%
avg views ÷ 8,981 subscribers
Avg views / post
447
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.978%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 64 of 95 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held95 (1 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total42,450
Reactions total301
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

301 reactions across 64 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11538.2%
👍9431.2%
🔥4113.6%
😁196.31%
👏103.32%
🥰92.99%
🤔61.99%
❤‍🔥10.332%
🆒10.332%
👌10.332%
😢10.332%
🙏10.332%
🤯10.332%
🤷10.332%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC410 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Простота хуже воровства Мы тут в квартире капитальный ремонт ваяем понемногу. Вот балкон делали на прошлой неделе. Парнишка, который там возился, говорит мне однажды: — Тут какая-то женщина под балконом стояла и спрашивала у меня: будем ли мы делать входную дверь? Я сказал, что не знаю, спросите у хозяев. Я удивилась — причём тут балкон и входная дверь? Дверь у нас отличная — металлическая, металл цельнолистовой,

1👍1

28 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC457 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Подскажи, по братски⁠⁠ Студентом в институте я был не то чтоб совсем разгильдяем, но и крайне ответственным тоже не был. Попал на пересдачу какой-то контрольной. Преподавателю заниматься отдельно с такими балбесами не с руки, поэтому пересдавали во время занятий у других групп. Сижу я, значит, рожаю ответы, соседи какую-то свою лабуду пишут. Попался какой-то особенно мудреный вопрос, в котором я совсем нивзубногой.

🥰2😁2

27 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC458 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Внезапно Однажды одной конторе потребовался грамотный сисадмин. Отсмотрели кучу хипстеров-стартаперов, кучу линуксоидов-красноглазиков — всё не то. Кто-то недостаточно крут, кто-то чрезмерно. Тогда эйчар решился на отчаянный шаг: достал из кучи присланных откликов резюме одной девушки и пригласил её пообщаться. Почему отчаянный? Ну, в нашей сфере цветёт и пахнет старый добрый сексизм. Не идут девчонки в сисадмины.

🤯1😁1

27 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC439 viewsread 28 August 2026

Я не знаю своих детей... Старший сын (5 класс) начал часто задерживаться после уроков. Окончание занятий в 13:00, домой приходит в 15:00. По субботам 4 урока, приходит домой как с 6 уроков. Постоянно у него было алиби — контрольные, уборки и дежурства. Сегодня узнали правду. В классе у мальчика умерла мама от рака. Отца нет. Воспитывает бабушка за 70 лет — его и младшего брата. И вот эти «тимуровцы» решили на сво

26 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC427 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Задолбали водятлы!!! Сегодня, часа три назад, я опять попал в аварию... Опять не по своей вине. Виновник пробку по встречке объехал и, возвращаясь в полосу, меня прижал. Притом я ему сигналил. Он же нажал на сигнал в ответ и придавил меня. И ВИНУ ОН НЕ ПРИЗНАВАЛ. Только сотрудник ГИБДД спустя почти два часа смог ему втолковать, что так нельзя ездить. Он 10 минут спорил с сотрудником... Виновник утверждал, что он ус

2🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC427 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

💬 Красавица Марина долго шла к своей цели. И в 35 лет вышла наконец замуж. Муж был, как полагается, сказочным принцем. Баловал свою принцессу безгранично. Но и требовал много: безупречная внешность, всегда хорошее настроение, улыбка, не больше глотка винa на бесконечных приёмах, никаких сигaрет... (Сам принц кyрил и выпивaл много и с наслаждением.) Всегда макияж, чулки/каблуки, платья... Всегда, даже дома... Даже

🥰2👍1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @istoriyaposigu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌹Посижу,почитаю|Добрые рассказы❤️Истории” (@istoriyaposigu), 8,981 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/istoriyaposigu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.