Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بكالوريا 2027 مع استاذ عصام الدين مادة علوم الطبيعة والحياة 🔥

Channel

بكالوريا 2027 مع استاذ عصام الدين مادة علوم الطبيعة والحياة 🔥

@issam_snv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

17,062subscribers

-240 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002168526012
TypeChannel
Username@issam_snv
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/issam_snv

Growth

17,06217,30217,1827 August 2026 — 17,302 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,279 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,244 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,228 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,209 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,170 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,160 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,124 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,097 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,081 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,062 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -240. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,026–17,338 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:5917,062-19
16 Aug 2026, 21:5417,081-16
15 Aug 2026, 15:0417,097-27
14 Aug 2026, 03:5717,124-36
12 Aug 2026, 18:3317,160-10
11 Aug 2026, 21:5617,170-39
10 Aug 2026, 19:1617,209-19
9 Aug 2026, 20:5217,228-16
8 Aug 2026, 23:0117,244-35
8 Aug 2026, 01:1417,279-23
7 Aug 2026, 14:3217,302first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.68%
avg views ÷ 17,062 subscribers
Avg views / post
458
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held30 (2 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total13,735
Reactions total222
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 27 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15670.3%
🫡229.91%
😭146.31%
😁94.05%
😱83.60%
🏆73.15%
🤔62.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC156 views14 reactionsread 17 August 2026

قريت كامل اقتراحاتكم و أسئلتكم 📝 و سأجيب عليها كاملة في اللايف الذي يسبق لايف المكتسبات بحول الله 🙏🎤 ابعثو لزملائكم كذلك باش يستفاد أكبر عدد 👥🚀

11🏆3

16 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC605 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026

ليكيب اقترحوا المشاكل تاعكم فالعلوم (منهجية.فهم الدروس ......) 📚💡 ان شاء الله راح نديرو لايف نتطرقو فيه لكل مشاكلكم 📹✨

7🏆2

16 Aug 2026, 00:29 UTC253 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026

إذا كنتَ/كنتِ رايح تعقب باك 2027 وتقول: «يا ربي كيفاش راح ندوز هاد العام؟»… فهذا المنشور ليك. أنا آية، باكالوريا 2026، شعبة علوم تجريبية، والحمدلله قدرت نتحصل على 17.65/20. وتحصلت على علامة : 🧬 علوم 18.5 والحمدلله قبل كل شيء وبعد كل شيء. لكن خليني نرجعكم شوية للوراء… في نفس الوقت هذا العام اللي فات، كنت في بلاصتكم. كنت خايفة، متوترة، ومخي عامر بالأسئلة: "واش راح نقرا؟ كيفاش راح نلحق؟ كيفاش نحفظ؟ كيفاش نفهم؟ وإذ

12

Signed Aya Bez

14 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC866 views8 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

باك 2027 برنامج العلوم الطبيعية https://t.me/issam_snv

8

12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC430 views19 reactionsread 17 August 2026

وقتاش راكم نبداو نديرو في حصص المكتسبات؟ 🤔💡 نسحق بزاف بارطاج باش كامل يستفادو 🚀📚 لعشية نعلنلكم عليها باذن الله 🌙✨

19

11 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC441 views8 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

أسئلتكم ... جاوبوها نتوما و بعدها نجاوب أنا

8

11 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC482 views3 reactionsread 17 August 2026

شكون راو يقرى فالمكتسبات 🤔🤔

3

7 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC738 views8 reactionsread 17 August 2026

شحال من وحدة صحيحة قيمو أنفسكم قبل دورة المكتسبات ☺️☺️

6🏆2

7 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC553 views4 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Poll

القواعد الآزوتية البيورينية

  1. الأدينوزين و الغوانين25%
  2. الأدنين و الغوانوزين17%
  3. الأدينين و الغوانين47%
  4. الأدينين و التايمين12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4

7 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC606 views6 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Poll

سلسلتي Adn

  1. لهما نفس الاتجاه2%
  2. متعاكستين في الاتجاه93%
  3. متماثلتين5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @issam_snv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz600 voters

القواعد الآزوتية البيورينية

  1. الأدينوزين و الغوانين25%
  2. الأدنين و الغوانوزين17%
  3. الأدينين و الغوانين47%
  4. الأدينين و التايمين12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz641 voters

سلسلتي Adn

  1. لهما نفس الاتجاه2%
  2. متعاكستين في الاتجاه93%
  3. متماثلتين5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz670 voters

يتكون ال Adn

  1. تتابع أحماض أمينية11%
  2. تتابع قواعد آزوتية15%
  3. تتابع نكليوتيدات74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz667 voters

المورثة

  1. هي قطعة من ADN تشرف على تركيب بروتين85%
  2. هي مجموعة من صبغيات5%
  3. تتكون من تتابع محدد من النيكليوزيدات9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz634 voters

النيكليوتيدات تتكون من

  1. حمض الفوسفوريك . سكر ريبوز كامل . قواعد آزوتية14%
  2. حمض الفوسفوريك مع سكر الريبوز منقوص الاكسوجين10%
  3. حمض الفوسفوريك مع قاعدة آزوتية2%
  4. قاعدة آزوتية. سكر ريبوز منقوص الاكسوجين. حمض الفوسفوريك75%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz624 voters

القواعد الآزوتية التي تدخل في تركيب ال ADN

  1. البيورينية فقط(A.C)2%
  2. البيريميدينية فقط (G.T)1%
  3. البيورينية (A.G) و البيريميدينية (T.C)85%
  4. البيورينية (A.C) و (G.T)12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 333,003 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بكالوريا 2027 مع استاذ عصام الدين مادة علوم الطبيعة والحياة 🔥” (@issam_snv), 17,062 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/issam_snv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.