Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Israel

@israel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,625subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002466924663
TypeChannel
Username@israel
DescriptionIsrael 🇮🇱 News, Analysis, Breaking news & current situation in conflict zones. fidf.org Farsi: @IsraelFarsi Official channel: @bnetanyahu
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/israel

Growth

16,62516,67516,6506 August 2026 — 16,675 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,675 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,669 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,661 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,650 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,647 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,643 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,631 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,625 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,618–16,683 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:0416,625-6
12 Aug 2026, 02:0416,631-12
11 Aug 2026, 01:1116,643-4
9 Aug 2026, 23:3216,647-3
8 Aug 2026, 20:5116,650-11
8 Aug 2026, 00:0516,661-8
6 Aug 2026, 22:5616,669-6
6 Aug 2026, 02:1816,675no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:5316,675first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 20 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.0%
avg views ÷ 16,625 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,140
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held17 (20 March 202621 July 2026)
Views total8,140
Reactions total218
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,110
Videos
688
Links
108

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 15s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,072 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣85741.4%
57227.6%
😢26512.8%
custom 533229946246110799524711.9%
🔥894.30%
❤‍🔥422.03%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,072reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @israel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 March 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC≈8,140 views218 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😢125🤣74❤‍🔥11🔥8

9 Jul 2026, 21:56 UTC≈13,500 views161 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣11432🔥8😢7

25 Mar 2026, 08:04 UTC≈44,400 views553 reactions10 Starsread 13 August 2026

Dear Iranians, @israel is interested in helping you set up a special, reliable connection to the internet. This operation functions far differently than the rest of unreliable VPNs you are familiar with. However, we need help from fellow Iranians that are interested in becoming contributors to this project. In exchange, you will receive money & internet access Iranians who are looking to contribute - DM @NotoNam

🤣342181🔥20❤‍🔥10

24 Mar 2026, 10:06 UTC≈40,000 views292 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @mossadinfarsi

شاهنامه آخرش خوش است

custom 5332299462461107995171🤣93❤‍🔥217

24 Mar 2026, 08:45 UTC≈35,800 views288 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

THE EXECUTION OF INNOCENCE: Melika Azizi (18) Murdered by the Regime 🕯️⚖️ ​While the world celebrates Nowruz, the Iranian regime chose blood. Melika Azizi, only 18, was executed under the baseless charge of "Moharebeh" (Enmity against God). ​The "Crime" of Bravery: Violently arrested during January protests in Masal, Melika’s only "crime" was demanding freedom. In Lakan Prison, she faced severe abuse and total isol

😢107🤣6764custom 533229946246110799550

23 Mar 2026, 21:03 UTC≈24,300 views87 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

THE FAILED LAUNCH: Iranian Citizens Mock Regime After Karaj Missile Blunder! 🚀🤡 ​The Iranian regime’s attempt to project power has once again turned into a public embarrassment. Following a failed missile launch yesterday at the Bidganeh base near Karaj, the Iranian street isn't trembling—it's laughing. ​From Terror to Comedy: Social media is flooded with Iranians mocking the IRGC’s technical incompetence. While th

🤣5028😢6🔥3

22 Mar 2026, 13:00 UTC≈19,800 views108 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

DESPERATION GOES DIGITAL: Iranian Regime Uses AI to Fake F-35 Crash! 🤖🤥 ​When the Iranian regime runs out of real victories, they turn to Artificial Intelligence to invent them. ​A video currently being circulated by regime mouthpieces—claiming to show a downed American F-35 near Bandar Abbas—is a 100% AI-generated fake. The Red Flags: A closer look reveals the truth: the physics are off, the "soldiers" look like d

🤣6525custom 533229946246110799518

21 Mar 2026, 17:36 UTC≈17,200 views47 reactionsread 13 August 2026

THE QATARI HYPOCRISY UNMASKED: Al Jazeera Calls for Terrorizing Iranian Civilians! 🎭🤮 The mask has finally slipped. The state-funded propaganda machine of Qatar, Al Jazeera, has reached a sickening new low in its double standards. The Shocking Call: In a recent broadcast, an Al Jazeera military analyst openly called for targeting civilian infrastructure across Iran. His "strategic" reason? Because Iranian citizens

32🤣13🔥2

21 Mar 2026, 16:56 UTC≈13,900 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026

​🚀 SUPPORT OUR CHANNEL! If you have a Telegram Premium subscription, please help us grow by giving our channel a Boost. Your support helps us reach more people with the truth! ​Click here to boost: 👇 https://t.me/boost/israel ​🚀 תמכו בערוץ שלנו! אם יש לכם מנוי טלגרם פרמיום, נשמח אם תוכלו לתת בוסט (Boost) לערוץ. התמיכה שלכם עוזרת לנו להגיע ליותר אנשים ולהפיץ את האמת! ​לחצו כאן למתן בוסט: 👇 https://t.me/boost/israel

11🤣11

21 Mar 2026, 16:53 UTC≈13,100 views42 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

PRECISION STRIKE: IDF Obliterates Iranian Missile Storage Site 🚀💥 The IDF Spokesperson has released exclusive footage from deep inside Iran: Five consecutive strikes in mere seconds. The Target: A major strategic missile storage facility. The synchronized attack completely neutralized the site, eliminating a large number of high-ranking personnel from Iran’s missile division. The Message: This isn't just a strike;

🔥1512custom 53322994624611079958🤣7

21 Mar 2026, 10:14 UTC≈12,200 views53 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

JUSTICE MARCHES ON: Senior Basij Commander Eliminated! ⚖️💥 Reports confirm that Azim Esmaeili, Deputy Commander of the Basij in Dezful, was eliminated yesterday in precision strikes. Who was he? A key architect in the regime’s internal terror machine, responsible for brutal crackdowns on Iranian citizens. The Reality: The IRGC’s "invincibility" is a myth. While these commanders are bold against unarmed protesters,

27🔥16😢8🤣2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @israel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 310,511 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Israel” (@israel), 16,625 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/israel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.