Как вы создали свой первый сайт?
- Написали на чистом HTML/CSS63%
- Запустили на CMS19%
- Использовали самописный движок5%
- Собрали в конструкторе14%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@ispmanager
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
1,059subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001554666392 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ispmanager |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ispmanager |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 1,059 | +2 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 1,057 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 1,059 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 1,061 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:09 | 1,060 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 1,061 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 1,060 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 1,062 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 1,061 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 1,061 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
65 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 44.6% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 18.5% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 7.69% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как вы создали свой первый сайт?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
35 лет онлайн: сайт, с которого всё началось 6 августа 1991 года Тим Бернерс-Ли опубликовал info.cern.ch — первую страницу в истории веба. Без картинок, личного кабинета и привычного дизайна: только текст, ссылки и объяснение, как работает World Wide Web. Восстановленная версия сайта открывается до сих пор. За 35 лет путь от простой HTML-страницы до современных сервисов, интернет-магазинов и сложных веб-проектов ст…
🔥6⚡1❤1
Что общего у CloudLinux, Ubuntu 26 и серверов, которые когда-то настраивали вручную? Всё это обсуждают у нас в сообществе ispmanager.🧊 Здесь общаются веб-разработчики, системные администраторы, владельцы веб-студий и другие специалисты, которые каждый день работают с сайтами и серверами. Делятся опытом, разбирают рабочие ситуации, задают вопросы и помогают друг другу находить решения. Команда ispmanager тоже здесь…
❤1
9 вещей, которые вызывают ностальгию у IT-специалистов 🕰 Давайте вспомним, с чем сталкивались айтишники в 1990-х и начале 2000-х. Приготовьтесь к приступу ностальгии. Предупреждение: если вы родились после 2000 года, многое из этого может вас удивить =) 💾 Устанавливали драйверы с дискет или CD-дисков После сборки нового компьютера или переустановки операционной системы Windows на экране появлялись значки устройств …
❤2
А что, по-вашему, будет через 5–10 лет?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🐍 От Змейки до GTA VI. Как менялись игровые движки Всё начиналось с нуля. В 70-х и 80-х никаких движков не было — код писали прямо под конкретный процессор. Pong, Space Invaders, Pac‑Man — это ручная работа на ассемблере. Каждая игра была привязана к железу, и о сложных проектах можно было только мечтать. В 90-х случился прорыв. С приходом 3D-графики стало понятно: нужны универсальные инструменты. Doom отделил движ…
❤3
Какой из языков попробовали бы?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🧠 10 странных языков программирования Если вы думаете, что С++ ломает мозг, есть хорошая новость — бывает и хуже. Вот подборка безумных языков: 🔮 Malbolge — самый сложный язык в мире. Работает в троичной системе, код зашифрован. На нём написано всего 3 программы! 👻 WhiteSpace — код состоит только из пробелов, табуляций и переносов строк. Всё остальное — комментарии. 🐒 Ook! — всего 3 синтаксических элемента, но ко…
— В этот раз всё по архитектуре!» (показывает нечто) — Ну, хотя бы попытка была...
❤7
npm — это…
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🚀 Без пота и крови разработчика. Мы сделали запуск Node.js классным! Деплой приложения порой представляется оптимистично: есть идея, есть домен, есть VPS, есть npm-пакет, который «просто запускается». А потом начинается реальность… 😈 Нужно поставить Node.js подходящей версии. Настроить зависимости. Поднять приложение на нужном порту. Прокинуть его через nginx. Не забыть про переменные окружения. Разобраться, чем …
❤2👍1
🤖 Форкай или уходи! Линус Торвальдс послал противников AI делать свои ветки C марта 2026 года AI Sashiko проверяет патчи, которые присылают мейнтейнеры Linux. Разработчик Лоран Пеншар предложил, чтобы мейнтейнеры сначала самостоятельно проверяли выводы Sashiko, а затем уже отправляли авторам патчей замечания. С этого начался спор о пользе и вреде AI, который заставил Линуса ответить. Вот некоторые его высказывания. …
❤6⚡4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ispmanager. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы создали свой первый сайт?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А что, по-вашему, будет через 5–10 лет?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой из языков попробовали бы?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
npm — это…
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Доверили бы данные GPT?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что думаете?
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ispmanager — сайты, хостинг, безопасность” (@ispmanager), 1,059 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ispmanager.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.