Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for منبع ضد اختلال | SORiN VPN

Channel

منبع ضد اختلال | SORiN VPN

@isor1n

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,602subscribers

-299 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003576098436
TypeChannel
Username@isor1n
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/isor1n

Growth

12,60212,90112,751.57 August 2026 — 12,901 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,901 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,886 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,876 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,833 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,790 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,753 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,717 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,692 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,647 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,602 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -299. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,557–12,946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 15:3412,602-45
17 Aug 2026, 14:0512,647-45
16 Aug 2026, 08:0712,692-25
14 Aug 2026, 16:4612,717-36
13 Aug 2026, 06:3712,753-37
12 Aug 2026, 06:5212,790-43
10 Aug 2026, 04:1712,833-43
9 Aug 2026, 01:2112,876-10
8 Aug 2026, 04:1212,886-15
7 Aug 2026, 18:3112,901no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:2212,901first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.40%
avg views ÷ 12,602 subscribers
Avg views / post
933
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.376%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 60 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held60 (1 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total55,968
Reactions total126
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3931.0%
3326.2%
🔥2519.8%
💯1713.5%
🆒75.56%
💘43.17%
💋10.794%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC244 views5 reactionsread 18 August 2026

اختصاصی رو ایمیل شخصی خودتون فعال میشه و اینجوری بگم ک قیمت ۱۸ ماه کمتر از ۳۰۰تومن ممکنه باشه✨ جز خودتون ۵ نفر دیگه رو هم میتونید تو گپ فمیلی اینوایت بدید و باهم از اشتراک استفاده کنید🤌 💻 | @isor1n

❤‍🔥3💯1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC267 views3 reactionsread 18 August 2026

فردا حدود 1000 تا Gemini pro 18 ماهه شارژ میشه تو بات مجموعه با کمترین قیمت ممکن میتونید خرید بزنید🔥 @isor1n

❤‍🔥1💘1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC291 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://serviceactivation.google.com/subscription/new/AQCpiIG5hZ0VOqL298ZLosJ82v4XTk1Pm4IZkpPzUaBlOIzJLNJOei3UamvG_KAIlkgT8IPEEBjSUWBsvA6MG0SYzLn13HjO1ATLKqX_J0tIN0SJkcRSnqk_QSdN9q0b6Ab9n7wPJfaBQqWh20mKMHy-BGyQI_7560NpqSVtb1fWktB5XNijKjSduXZMzTJ91t7RbusjJA58WMOplmhLExpirQtJDi-hJXOa6QiIJWSwDse3tYMO-4wCYkrwRGaVhSJkTr_8bXOyRCF2-Q== جمنای ۱۸ماهه هرکی فعال کرد نوش جونش

17 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC343 viewsread 18 August 2026

🔴 گویا قراره نت هم گرون کنن!! مدیرعامل آسیاتک مردم دارن خیلی اینترنت مصرف میکنن چون قیمت هر گیگ اینترنت بسیار ناچیزه 📱 | @isor1n

17 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC414 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

😺🔆برای تهیه اکانت پلاس ChatGPT اشتراکی با آخرین نسخه برای ۶ ماه فقط ۸۵۰ هزار تومان ( ۱۰ عدد موجوده ) به پشتیبانی پیام بدین @rovxi

17 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC533 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

api key🔑: sk-Gz3jRJ3utgnxuBK4It6LVgfJwDtRXHBRwp2uKw ❗️limite 100.000.000 site: https://gregy.nbhooks.me/#/login

17 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC422 viewsread 18 August 2026

یه api key هم میزارم براتون 100 میل توکن داره برای kimi k3 | Glm 5.2 میتونید استفاده کنید💋

17 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC456 views4 reactionsread 18 August 2026

‎💎 CHARGED For Adobe ‎───────────────────── ‎4640182138792795|10|26|509 5313770079193255|10|29|917 reactions ♥️

❤‍🔥3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @isor1n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,468,655 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“منبع ضد اختلال | SORiN VPN” (@isor1n), 12,602 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/isor1n.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.