Channel
@ishhh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,717subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003664680242 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ishhh |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ishhh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 2,717 | -13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 2,730 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 2,730 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (11 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,628 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2.4万美元，他把同胞卖到了园区 8月13日，金边市初级法院审理了一起绑架案。一名34岁的中国籍赌场员工因涉嫌将一名中国女子以2.4万美元的价格卖到了一家赌场而被捕。 据悉，男子名叫李明光（Li Guang Ming，音译）。据指控，2025年9月8日，他在金边市桑园区绑架一名中国女子，并将其贩卖给电诈团伙，获利2.4万美元。2025年9月18日，李明光被捕，并被关押至白梳监狱，并 依据《打击人口贩卖和性剥削法》第14条被提起公诉。目前，李明光被控人口贩卖罪，若罪名成立，将面临2至5年监禁。 一键收藏·飞机内幕🔥🔥🔥
一中国男子在波贝被扣押 昨天，卜迭棉芷省警方对波贝市3处涉嫌电诈的可疑窝点展开突击搜查。 行动中，执法人员在第3处地点抓获1名签证逾期3个月的中国籍男子，并当场查获手机、无线对讲机、吸Du工具、一枚9毫米子弹及枪套等证物。 目前，该中国籍嫌犯已被移交波贝市警局接受进一步依法审理。 一键收藏·飞机内幕🔥🔥🔥
公安部上周公布了网络空间监督检查办法，对国内的灰产，可以说是灭顶之灾 首先，无论你是什么角色，公安都有权对你强制检查。你居住地的派出所警察都可以随时进你家门对你的网络和电子设备进行检查。 一键收藏·飞机内幕🔥🔥🔥
#群友投稿：马来西亚新山服装厂附近，移民局检查非法外劳，大批外劳被抓。 马来西亚新山服装厂附近，移民局检查非法外劳，大批外劳被抓。 V
柬埔寨大事件-海外新闻, [2026/8/14 16:49] #网友爆料 西港红灯笼后方区域，警方正逐户上门核查登记，开展排查行动，周边人员请多加留意。 柬埔寨大事件-海外新闻, [2026/8/14 18:03] #巴基斯坦资讯：伊斯兰堡警方突击“Sparco Plaza大楼”，抓获374名中国籍嫌疑人！ 8月11日晚间，巴基斯坦联邦调查局（FIA）联合国家网络犯罪调查局（NCCIA），对伊斯兰堡古尔贝格格林片区的Sparco Plaza商业大楼开展联合突击清查。 据当地媒体披露，该大楼长期是网络犯罪活动聚集地，早已受到执法部门关注，楼内长期被外籍人员用于开展各类商业活动，执法部门接到线索后实施本次统一抓捕。 执法人员进入大楼后对在场外籍人员逐一核查甄别。FIA通过综合边境管理系统核验入境及居留材料，查出258名无法提供巴基斯坦合法居留有效证件的中国籍人员。该批人员大多持访问、旅游或商务签证入境，按照巴基斯坦法律，此类…
#最新动态：2026年8月14日上午，老挝外国人管理相关部门与经济保护警察机构联手展开专项执法。沙湾拿吉省指挥部查获了一批涉嫌参与电信诈骗（电话中心）活动的外籍人员。 此次执法行动共拘留72人，其中女性8人。根据初步核查，部分人员涉嫌非法入境、非法离境及相关走私行为。 被拘留人员构成如下：中国籍52人，含女性1人；越南籍8人，含女性4人；缅甸籍1人，含女性1人；菲律宾籍1人，含女性1人；非洲籍3人，含女性1人；喀麦隆籍1人；其他非洲国家籍2人；以及埃塞俄比亚籍4人。 现阶段，涉案人员已被移交至相关机构，后续将依据老挝人民民主共和国的法律程序展开深入调查与处理。 一键收藏·飞机内幕🔥🔥🔥
最近有网友曝料称，在亚美尼亚大举招人的168集团和双赢集团，在当地惹出麻烦后被警方驱逐了。 公司人事还忽悠应聘者，谎称是签证办不下来，试图把人转往菲律宾。 上个月还天天张罗着把人招到亚美尼亚，这个月就逼着全员离开，否则就拿不到薪水，上个月刚到亚美尼亚的这批人，这个月连一个月都没待满，意思就是不去菲律宾就别想拿钱。 一键收藏·飞机内幕🔥🔥🔥
#马来西亚资讯：吉打州移民局突击搜查兰卡威一处建筑工地，拘留104名非法移民 吉打州移民局局长莫哈末·里祖安·莫哈末·扎因表示，此次行动于下午 3 点 15 分开始，由移民行动小组和执法部门的 15 名官员和成员参与，他们根据收到的信息开展了一次特别行动小组 移民局强调，将继续毫不妥协地持续开展执法行动，打击该州境内的非法移民。“对于任何被发现雇用、保护或为违反移民法的外国人提供保护的雇主或个人，也将采取严厉措施， ps： 马来西亚的外劳真的抓不完 一键收藏·飞机内幕🔥🔥🔥
🇲🇾 65岁搞流动伪基站被抓！ 马来西亚警方近日展开行动，成功阻断一起针对跨境旅客的网络钓鱼诈骗案。 据报道，一名65岁马来西亚籍男子被捕。嫌犯涉嫌在车辆上安装伪基站，利用新山与新加坡边境高峰期拥堵时段，向周边手机发送钓鱼短信。行动中查获手机、GSM模块及车辆等作案工具。 马警方表示，此前已在柔佛和云顶高原展开多起同类打击行动，逮捕5人并查扣30件配件及5辆车。官方呼吁公众提高警惕并积极举报可疑信息。 年少不努力， 65岁还不能退休～～ 一键收藏·飞机内幕🔥🔥🔥
#网友爆料 刚到金边，亲身踩坑街边这家按摩店，一场按摩下来，身上现金全部被偷走。 这边很多街边按摩店套路很深，标价就三五块钱超低价格先把你吸引进店。包间一关基本都是监控盲区，趁着人按摩放松、防备放下的时候伺机动手。 出事之后我也选择报警处理，实际沟通非常困难。店家直接矢口否认，店里早就做好准备，没有留下证据，我手里也拿不出实锤证明。折腾半天毫无进展，最后只能无可奈何，硬生生吃下这个哑巴亏。 拿自己亲身经历提醒在这边还有准备过来的朋友，千万别被低价迷惑双眼。外出钱财一定要贴身保管好，不要随手放在包里、外套内。看着按摩就三五块小钱，一不小心，全身家当都给你套路走。在外多留一个心眼，千万不要大意中招。 一键收藏·飞机内幕🔥🔥🔥
茶胶杀妻案嫌犯落网 茶胶省8月7日发生的夫刺死妻命案成功告破。48岁嫌犯在持刀刺死50岁妻子后骑车潜逃，茶胶省警方与波罗勉省警力展开跨省联合追捕，于次日（8月8日）在波罗勉将其抓获。 经查，嫌犯因感情嫉妒与妻子发生争执，随后持刀向妻子连刺5刀致其当场身亡。 一键收藏·飞机内幕🔥🔥🔥
#群友吐槽：各大盘总都看看吧，这就是公司和公司之间的差距。 别人家的公司业绩不好，解散了还和和气气地发遣散费；我们公司业绩不好，就要电你😅。五十多人充值50W人民币，不想想项目原因，到处找员工原因。粉都没有，接粉工具都有问题，那你们管理层不处理，员工上班不睡觉、不刷抖音干嘛？靠着加班就有业绩吗？ 哎，东南亚，这苦逼日子什么时候是个头啊。想跳槽，不认识好公司；不跳槽，每个月底薪等死，还担惊受怕的，怕遣返回去坐牢。现在出国当狗推，真不如进厂当厂狗了，起码还能免费玩几个厂妹，舒服舒服。 一键收藏·飞机内幕🔥🔥🔥
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ishhh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,228,402 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨大事件-海外新闻” (@ishhh), 2,717 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ishhh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.