Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ищу сп|друзейᵗᶦᵃᶰ

Channel

ищу сп|друзейᵗᶦᵃᶰ

@isdvti

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

15,355subscribers

+399 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001711517711
TypeChannel
Username@isdvti
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/isdvti

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

41.5 average views per post against 15,355 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.27%. Across the 13,832 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,016–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.59% and 18.4%, with a median of 9.17%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured106 of 106 published in the window (106 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled4,394
Mature posts only0.373% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers15,355 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 13,832 channels · p10 2.33% · p25 4.59% · p50 9.17% · p75 18.4% · p90 33.2%
Position in cohort0.600th percentile · 1/34 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.188% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 98.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

14,20415,35514,779.57 August 2026 — 14,956 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,956 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,903 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,861 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,822 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,834 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,812 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,785 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,786 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,758 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,725 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,686 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,642 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,622 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,585 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,504 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,452 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,426 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,396 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,365 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,345 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,312 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,270 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,246 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,239 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,207 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,204 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,284 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,394 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,725 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,044 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,276 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,355 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +399. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,031–15,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:5915,355+79
16 Sept 2026, 02:5715,276+232
14 Sept 2026, 07:5815,044+319
12 Sept 2026, 15:5814,725+331
10 Sept 2026, 13:3714,394+110
7 Sept 2026, 12:1714,284+80
4 Sept 2026, 15:5714,204-3
2 Sept 2026, 23:1614,207-32
1 Sept 2026, 18:1414,239-7
31 Aug 2026, 20:4214,246-24
30 Aug 2026, 22:2514,270-42
29 Aug 2026, 23:4414,312-33
29 Aug 2026, 01:0814,345-20
28 Aug 2026, 03:5414,365-31
27 Aug 2026, 06:3314,396-30
26 Aug 2026, 05:0914,426-26
25 Aug 2026, 03:1714,452-52
23 Aug 2026, 19:1714,504-81
22 Aug 2026, 05:1414,585-37
20 Aug 2026, 20:2614,622first reading

Engagement

595 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.27%
avg views ÷ 15,355 subscribers
Avg views / post
41.5
106 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
106
of 595 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 106 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held595 (7 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total4,394
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 59s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋457.1%
👀342.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 595 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 595 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:47 UTC35 viewsread 2 September 2026

​​✨✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨✨+ ОТЗЫВОВ 🤩🤩🤩🤩✨из и вирт номера 🤩🤩🤩🤩без спамблока 🤩🤩🤩🤩🫧везды по 🤩🤩🤩🤩низким ценам 𓂃⟡🥹 ⠀࣪ഒ 🌹䴳。 🥹21:12 🌟🌟 ✨ыстрая накрутка 🌟🌟 и удаленные подарки 🤩🤩🫧изкие цены, отзывы и владелец, который всё объяснит✨ 🥹канал: @themoklkimo 🥹отзывы: @reviewsyosya

Signed Moder.

2 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC31 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Профиль, который хочется рассматривать. Аватар, который запоминается. Оформление, которое вызывает комплименты. Хочешь такой? Тогда тебе сюда: https://t.me/zedderrr

Signed tiana

2 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC42 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

вас приветствует картерские.мы ищем активных и общительных нью в нашу кф с анкетами и инициалами.поболтаем обо всем,заставлю вас считать розетки в доме и устрою допрос.рж и нотвирт не принимаем. ищем админов по нью и активу. будем рады видеть каждого,по вступлению писать:@nanamishkyy

Signed tiana

2 Sept 2026, 13:04 UTC30 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

нежных,милых в стик канал. - не знаешь где найти стикеры с биасом? тебе к нам! @sticksD

Signed Love Untold

2 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC37 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Cute & Sex Felix ищет знакомств и любимого. 19 в рж., bottom, single, чп мск. Чаны, Хёнджины — жду вас💋 Сходим вместе в рейв, пройдем тесты, просто поговорим по душам. Также пойду во флуд или кф по скз строго 18+. Меньше 18, дамы, занятые, не скз персы, нотвирт — мимо. Юз — @lixfix

Signed Love Untold

2 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC26 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

канал по интерактивам. залетайте, милые! вы не только сможете найти своего человека, а так же поучаствовать в различных рубриках, пообщаться с приятными админами (кто знает, может, кто-то из них и есть ваша судьба). ✔️ множество рубрик и интерактивов. ✔️каждый день занимательный и интересный! надеюсь, мы вас заинтересовали). ждем всех прекрасных! 😉

Signed Moder.

2 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC40 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Нахожусь в активном поиске друзей и возможно чего-то большего В последнее время стало очень одиноко, и я хотела бы найти отдушину ввиде хорошего человека. Хотела бы видеть в своем лс личностей не младше 15 и не старше 19. Со мной достаточно трудно найти общий язык или хотя бы заинтересовать меня, но надеюсь, что именно у тебя получится это сделать. Если всё же получится, то гарантирую от себя лучшее общение Иччи дево…

Signed Moder.

2 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC45 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Прелестный чбтх ищет себе знакомств,а также love. Буду рад увидеть у себя в лс любый персов. дамы, только дружба. Сходим в рейв понежимся и все, что вашей душе угодно. Также хочу предупредить,что мой чп +7 к мск,так что сами решайте,будет ли вам удобно со мной общаться. Младше 15,старше 19, реклама,кф,флуды и прочая ересь. — бан. my anon для стесняшек me

Signed tiana

2 Sept 2026, 03:30 UTC55 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Вас волнует работа, учеба, финансы, выбор пути или общие перспективы будущего?Вам нужны четкие факты, логика и конкретный совет? И вы постоянно думаете: «Как же поступить?..» Вас волнуют отношения, чувства, страсть, скрытые мотивы партнера или причины затянувшегося конфликта? Вы хотите снять с человека маску и заглянуть в его подсознание? Тогда вам ко мне! 👼Расклады таро на любой вкус 🌟Разбор мат…

Signed tiana

1 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC57 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте, если моя анкета покажется для вас странной, то прошу пролистнуть сразу. Ищу человека, чтобы поставить совму по 504 (380 + 124 из дорамы игра в кальмара), парное описание и возможно оформление, ну вообщем парные акаунты. Буквально на пару дней или неделю, просто надоело быть с одиночным акаунтом, а всем друзьям есть с кем ставить, либо же не хотят, так что если вам тоже не с кем, но хотите, то давайте …

Signed Moder.

1 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC47 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

☺️☺️☺️☺️ теги: расклады, таро. связь - @rewepd 📤 Стаж 4,5 года. 📤 Доступные цены и скидки. 📤 Помогу узнать, что скрывает объект обожания. Всю подробную информацию можно найти у меня на канале @cattitarot⚪️@cattitarot⚪️@cattitarot

Signed Moder.

Showing the 12 most recent of 595 posts we hold for @isdvti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ищу сп|друзейᵗᶦᵃᶰ” (@isdvti), 15,355 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/isdvti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.