Channel
@ischemist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,093subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001315833732 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ischemist |
| Created | 6 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ischemist |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 2,093 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 2,097 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 2,096 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 2,097 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 2,096 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 2,096 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
173 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 42.2% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 27.2% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 5.78% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 5.78% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 4.62% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 4.05% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 3.47% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 3.47% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.578% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Last September, Apple said it leveraged its hardware and operating system expertise into a technology called Memory Integrity Enforcement (MIE), which it described as “the culmination of an unprecedented design and engineering effort, spanning half a decade.” With Claude, building the code that exploited the two MacOS bugs took five days, Calif says. P.s. this is a gift link, so no paywall https://www.wsj.com/tech…
❤9
За узким кругом e/acc и людей напрямую работающих над ИИ, вполне естественным образом у читателя может возникнуть вопрос: а мы не просили создание ИИ моделей, которые способны на кибератаки. Ирония в том, что эти возможности появились естественным образом в результате попыток улучшить их способности написания кода. И если вы скажете, а мне и для обычного кода ЛЛМки не нужны, я вас направлю к предыдущей фуге где объ…
🔥8❤🔥1
Что можно сделать для минимизации риска? Если вы здравый разраб, то вы скорее всего уже пользуетесь современным package manager, который использут lockfiles. Если же вы традиционный питоновский разраб, при всей моей любви к питону, с сегодняшнего дня и до тех пор пока вы используете pip install -r requirements.txt вы являетесь радиоактивной обузой для всех, с кем вы взаимодействуете. Во втором голосе объясняю поче…
🔥9❤🔥1
Как вы могли заметить, это снова фуга. В первом голосе я передаю свое понимание причин/механизма supply chain атаки на TanStack и другого, более ядреного эксплоита CopyFail — который любой из вас может воспроизвести за пару секунд на любом linux VPS. https://ischemist.com/writings/fugues/ai-changed-the-math/sci-fi-cyberattacks
❤1❤🔥1
Некоторые могут отнестись к этому всему со скепсисом. А че мне терять?
❤4❤🔥1
Unfortunately, if you’re doing anything of economic / societal value, you must immediately start worrying about cyber security and changing habits. The mental model you should have is that EVERYTHING on the internet can be and will be compromised. https://ischemist.com/writings/fugues/ai-changed-the-math
💯3❤1
В понедельник прошла массовая supply chain атака на ветку обожаемых всеми библиотек TanStack. Если вам не посчастливилось установить скомпрометированную версию, у вас моментально крали все ваши API и Github токены и SSH ключи. И если бы вы пошли делать то, что стал бы делать любой здравый человек - отзывать, например, украденный гитхаб токен — вы бы потеряли все свои данные, ибо помимо всего прочего скрипт устанавл…
🤯10❤1
Не новость, но хорошая сводка https://reason.com/2026/05/06/how-a-scientific-cartel-protects-fraudsters-and-rakes-in-billions-of-taxpayer-dollars
❤🔥2😢1
If you’re curious about the inner workings of financial institutions, you should follow Patrick McKenzie. He also has a podcast in which he reads some of his essays (complex systems) https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/nonprofit-indicted-bank-fraud/ https://www.complexsystemspodcast.com/episodes/splc-financial-infrastructure/ The subject matter of this essay is absolutely surreal, straight Alex Jones territory …
👍6❤2
Хакеры получили доступ к non-sensitive environment variables сайтов размещенных на Vercel (один из крупнейших игроков хостинга сайтов написанных на NextJS). https://vercel.com/kb/bulletin/vercel-april-2026-security-incident Произошло это крайне интересным способом - один из сотрудников Vercel авторизовывался со своей рабочей почтой через OAuth в context.ai, и кто-то в прошлом месяце (!!!) получил доступ к OAuth ток…
❤10😢7🔥3💯2
В третьем голосе я возможно сформулировал по истине новое философское наблюдение: > Some disciplines are more fertile for the formalization of best practices, but those practices are domain transcendent По сути это ответ на сентимент "ок, ЛЛМ хорошо справляются с доменами где есть verifiable rewards, а вот в моей любимой экспериментальной науке такого нет, так что ваши ИИ будут бесполезны" https://ischemist.com/wr…
❤4🔥1
Второй голос выражает мою позицию почему несмотря на то, что все больше и больше кода будет писаться с помощью ИИ, получать полноценное системное образование в CS может быть чуть ли не самым рациональным решением. https://ischemist.com/writings/fugues/software-is-a-force-multiplier/we-need-swe-minds
🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ischemist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IsChemist, PhD” (@ischemist), 2,093 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ischemist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.