Channel
@irsedahaar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,152subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001812504180 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irsedahaar |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irsedahaar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 11,152 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 11,162 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 11,163 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 11,162 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:29 | 11,166 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 11,170 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 11,176 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 11,189 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 11,194 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 11,192 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
128 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 78.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 27 | 21.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 18 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @irsedahaar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 April 2026 to 18 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ахават, сегодня решила себя порадовать обновочками)) Стоило мне зайти в магазин, я увидела его… не платье, а разрыв сердечка 💔 Ткань - купра креп) бомбочка такая Я из тех, которая обращает внимание на пошив, а тут пошив безупречен, اللهم بارك Все одеяние - собственное производство, платье как у меня доступно к заказу в других цветах)) Скоро уже Ид аль-Адха, так что готовимся ахават 🫂 Оставляю ее инст 🤍
❤🔥10❤9
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته 🤍
❤9
Не пропустите последний час аср)
❤9
Сегодня пятница, так приумножьте же Салават на нашего Пророка Мухаммадаﷺ ٱللَّٰهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَىٰ مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَىٰ آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ وَسَلِّم. Аллахумма салли 'аля Мухаммадин ва 'аля али Мухаммад «О Аллах, благослови Мухаммада и семейство Мухаммада» – Посланник Аллахаﷺ сказал: «Поистине, пятница является одним из наилучших ваших дней. В этот день был сотворён Адам, и в этот день он скончался. В этот день подуют в Ро…
❤11❤🔥3
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته 🤍
❤5
Вайб ночных смен))
❤11
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته На любимую работу в любую работу получилось… Но الحمد لله за все
❤11
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7
Завершила работу, как вам?)🤍
❤8❤🔥8
Ваа 10 звездочек))
❤5
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Как вы?🤍 سبحان الله Так печально без тг премиум ههههه
❤5
Моя ниша, жду от вас актива, поддержки))🫂🤍
❤🔥4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @irsedahaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أم الكتاب” (@irsedahaar), 11,152 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irsedahaar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.