Channel
@irmin_beads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002153990637 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irmin_beads |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irmin_beads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 17 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 17 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
119 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5215399914476956513 | 24 | 20.2% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 16.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 16.0% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5215658265349747386 | 13 | 10.9% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 5.04% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 5.04% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.20% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.36% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 2.52% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.84% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.84% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.84% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.84% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.84% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2025 to 14 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет! 🐈⬛️ Простите, что так давно не было постов, на это были причины. И это 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 на тестик от @ronnybeads. Сплëл я его давольно давно – где-то в апреле. Это наверное сама крупная и одна из самых любимых фигурок в коллекции.🐈 [19/50]
❤🔥6🍾1🔥1🤯1
Posted without readable text
Всем привет! 😘 А вот и моя новая работа, которых, кстати, не было туже почти 2 месяца - 🤌🤌🤌🤌🤌🤌 на тест от Тани Он получился очень милый, мне очень нравится, теперь у моего льва есть друг Давайте накидаем реакций за моë возвращение и за такую милую работу🧡 [18/50]
custom 52156582653497473864🔥2custom 52153999144769565132👏1💘1😁1😍1
Всем привет! Давненько меня не было😅 Я просто был в лагере, а сделать про это пост не было времени. Сейчас я уже стараюсь активно плести Вот что я успел сделать после приезда (на самом деле есть ещë глазки, но я их уже вплëл в голову). Так что вас ждëт несколько работ в ближайшее время По итогу апреля у меня целых 0 фигурок, что меня очень расстраивает. А ещë я не успел сплести несколько тестов из-за пребывания в …
😭3custom 52153999144769565132❤🔥1🕊1
А вот, как и всегда - с опозданием, итоги за 🔤🔤🔤🔤❗️ Вышло не так много - всего 6 работ, все из них это тесты😵💫 (Собачку я вам не показывал. Если будет настроение, может в апреле с ней сделаю пост)
❤4🔥3custom 52153999144769565132👏1😁1
Всем привет! 🐀 Я к вам с ещë одной работой (закончил ещë в марте) сейчас только дошли руки написать пост) Эта такая милая🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣на тест от Сырка Плëл не долго. Получилась она очень прикольная, как и всё авторки Сырка.🐀 Оцениваем еë реакциями⤵️ [17/50]
custom 52153999144769565135🔥2⚡1❤1🥰1😁1
Всем привет! 😊 Вот такого милого 🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣 я сплëл ✨Плëл его на тест от @Biser_linexw ✨Эта работа мне безумно нравится💜, так ещё и такой сочный цвет ✨Плëл его из моего любимого алебастрового бисера (только коготки из обычного)⭐️ Оцениваем этого милаху реакциями💜 [16/50]
❤🔥4❤2🔥1custom 52153999144769565131
Всем приветик! А вот и ещë одна готовая работа - ⌛️⌛️⌛️⌛️⌛️⌛️⌛️ ⌛️⌛️⌛️⌛️⌛️ на тестик от Лисы Честно говоря я не думал что она получится такой крупной. Работа получилась очень классная💕 [15/50]
❤🔥6💘3🔥2custom 52153999144769565132🥰1
➖➖Всем привет!➖➖ Давненько что-то не было постов☺️ Но я старательно плëл, и у меня есть несколько готовых работы, которые вы ещë ре видели🩷 И вот одна из них - Китайский дракон🐉 на тест от Сырка Какой же этот дракон классный, он стал наверное моей любимой фигуркой💗 Оцените его реакциями🤩 [14/50]
❤5❤🔥2👏1💘1🔥1🥰1😁1custom 52153999144769565131
Всем приветик! 🐈 Вот ещë одна новая работа - 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 на тестик от @shopbeadviki Как по мне она получилась очень миленькая 🌸 Поддерживаем еë реакциями 🩷 [13/50]
custom 52153999144769565135custom 52156582653497473863👏1💘1🔥1😁1
А вот и ещë одни глазки
custom 52156582653497473865🔥1🥰1custom 52153999144769565131
Доброго времени суток! 🌸 Сегодня я к вам с необычным постом. Немного не по теме, но пусть будет На днях довязал эту кайфовую чайку🦋 (да-да, я ещë и вязать крючком умею) Оцениваем мои старания реакциями🎀
❤7custom 52153999144769565133👏1🔥1😁1custom 52156582653497473861
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @irmin_beads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,242,230 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑰𝒓𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝒃𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒔🪻” (@irmin_beads), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irmin_beads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.