Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Madir · Ирена Мадир

@irmadir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,667subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291895651
TypeChannel
Username@irmadir
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/irmadir

Growth

4,6534,6674,6606 August 2026 — 4,654 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,653 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,659 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,667 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,651–4,669 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:544,667+8
10 Aug 2026, 05:514,659+6
7 Aug 2026, 01:304,653-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:134,654first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.3%
avg views ÷ 4,667 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held26 (28 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total41,583
Reactions total4,745
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,745 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52692661058132030482,16845.7%
custom 527627320751767307372915.4%
custom 535282725865235062563613.4%
custom 58727820511150128534449.36%
custom 53459450116471870414028.47%
custom 53706826016379543662896.09%
custom 5411187068111985128491.03%
custom 6237708873747141497230.485%
custom 498555370024940474750.105%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,745reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 26 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @irmadir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC793 views171 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @unholy_krisPhoto

Вот вам ещё два аргумента на почитать Серпентарий от Ирены Мадир💚 я вообще про фото! шаловливая твоя фантазия!😈

custom 5352827258652350625115custom 587278205111501285335custom 527627320751767307319custom 54111870681119851282

10 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC≈1,120 views139 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я: у меня нет гиперфиксации на Томе Холланде, пфффф😤 Я: *сохраняю подборку фильмов с Томом Холландом и начинаю их смотреть по порядку* 🕷 Ладно, возможно, гиперфикс есть🕷 Скажите, что я не одна такая😂 На чем или на ком вы в последнее время ловили гиперфикс?

custom 5269266105813203048106custom 541118706811198512826custom 52762732075176730737

10 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,230 views181 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

2 подружки в хитах продаж😏 3-тя не успевает😅 Ну и што ш... Объявляю неделю скидок на Литрес на «Серпентарий», «Обскур» и «Маскарад»🤩

custom 5269266105813203048123custom 527627320751767307337custom 541118706811198512821

10 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC≈1,230 views221 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тем временем первый тираж «Серпентария» стремительно тает🔥 Книги нет на вб (только перекупы), в чг книга осталась только в конкретных магазинах, а держится только озон😂 Но доп тираж должен выйти уже в конце августа💚

custom 5352827258652350625153custom 526926610581320304841custom 587278205111501285327

9 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈1,300 views107 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Те, кто хотели бы почитать это, а чего вы молчали?😂 В нельзяграме мне в лс 3 раза писали, а тут никто не спрашивал даже, хотя здесь и комменты, и анонимка есть😁 Я поэтому и сделала для нельзяграма, что там запрос такой был. Я ж человек простой: меня просят что-то рассказать, я рассказываю, что могу🌚

custom 526926610581320304886custom 534594501164718704111custom 52762732075176730739custom 53528272586523506251

9 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈1,300 views146 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Выложила в нельзяграме серию сторис про мой путь от фикбука до двух издательств😁 Всё ещё есть слабая надежда во мне, что я буду вести эту соцсеть😅 Вы там сидите?👀

custom 526926610581320304899custom 527627320751767307327custom 534594501164718704120

9 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC≈1,260 views208 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @unholy_krisPhoto

Он всегда прятался во мгле, и, кажется, вся его душа была пропитана мраком, а сердце наверняка было такого же угольного цвета... 💚Серпентарий Ирена Мадир

custom 5352827258652350625149custom 527627320751767307335custom 587278205111501285324

8 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,430 views222 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ой, я только увидела, что «Маскарад» на Литрес стал хитом продаж🥹 Спасибо всем, кто читает💓 Просто лучшие🫂❤️‍🔥

custom 5276273207517673073136custom 534594501164718704144custom 587278205111501285331custom 526926610581320304811

8 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC≈1,470 views144 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тэк, мне написали, что не находят «Серпентарий» на вб, но всё окей, просто там пока книга закончилась💚 Зато «Серпентарий» всё ещё есть на озоне и в читай-городе💚

custom 5352827258652350625109custom 526926610581320304828custom 58727820511150128537

7 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈2,170 views295 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«Обскур» готовится полным ходом, видела вёрстку сегодня😊 В книге будет 380 страничек🥹 Такая вот крошка-картошка будет среди остальных моих гигантов🫠

custom 5269266105813203048212custom 527627320751767307342custom 587278205111501285330custom 534594501164718704111

7 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,630 views117 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Скорее всего на следующей неделе проведу трансляцию🥹 (специально для тех, до кого не могу доехать со встречами🩷) Поэтому можете оставлять вопросы в комментариях или писать в анонимку то, что вас интересует. Будем обсуждать. Можно что угодно, что вам хочется, на счёт чего вы бы хотели услышать мои мысли, или можно просто спросить про мои книги, персонажей и хэдканоны👍 🫘ссылка для анонимных вопросов🫘 ⁨https://t.me/que

custom 534594501164718704185custom 526926610581320304827custom 53528272586523506255

7 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC≈1,550 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Разница в шрифтах заставляет меня хихикать😅 не могу теперь воспринимать крупный шрит🙈 А вообще, кстати, поделитесь в комментариях, какие книги сейчас читаете👀

custom 526926610581320304884custom 534594501164718704124

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @irmadir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,412 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Madir · Ирена Мадир” (@irmadir), 4,667 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irmadir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.