🌟🌟
custom 53571694405238517884⚡3custom 53549061173129145173

Channel
@irlestkai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002936473093 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irlestkai |
| Description | cr kailverkami |
| Created | 6 September 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irlestkai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 20 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 20 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 6 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
301 reactions across 5 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💊 | 55 | 18.3% | |
| 🕊 | 42 | 14.0% | |
| 🎉 | 32 | 10.6% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 9.63% | |
| custom 5391177163372269051 | 25 | 8.31% | |
| 👎 | 17 | 5.65% | |
| ⚡ | 16 | 5.32% | |
| 🆒 | 13 | 4.32% | |
| 🎃 | 9 | 2.99% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 2.66% | |
| custom 5377740431201154516 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| custom 5379648418882797577 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| 🌭 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| custom 5377416332969001080 | 6 | 1.99% | |
| custom 5310197711079768772 | 5 | 1.66% | |
| custom 5388690613531085112 | 5 | 1.66% | |
| custom 5317040809458031383 | 4 | 1.33% | |
| custom 5357169440523851788 | 4 | 1.33% | |
| 😈 | 4 | 1.33% | |
| custom 5354906117312914517 | 3 | 0.997% | |
| 2 further kinds | 3 | 0.997% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @irlestkai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 September 2025 to 25 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌟🌟
custom 53571694405238517884⚡3custom 53549061173129145173
привет
custom 539117716337226905119custom 53796484188827975777custom 53774163329690010806🕊3⚡2
❌who r u 2 yani? 🎃 — friend 🌭 — BFF ⚡ — familiar 🆒 — ofc fan 💊/🕊 — stranger 🎉 — want to be friends
💊55🕊39🎉32⚡11🆒11🎃9🌭7😈3
МНЕНИЕ О ЯНИ ВСЕ СХАВАЮ 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝐘𝐀𝐍𝐈 ㅤ ㅤ 😻
❤🔥8custom 53777404312011545167❤5💋2🆒2custom 53101977110797687722custom 53170408094580313832custom 53911771633722690512
🤩🔠🤩🔠 / 🅰️👹🩸 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍 щп 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗇 dm 🏁; bday december 31; msc+6 / ykt
❤24👎17custom 53101977110797687723custom 53886906135310851123custom 53911771633722690512😈1custom 53170408094580313831
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @irlestkai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,019,870 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“info яни” (@irlestkai), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irlestkai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.