Channel
@irlclove
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002288148596 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irlclove |
| Created | 13 January 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irlclove |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 13 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 13 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
971 reactions across 6 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5237869568461920235 | 130 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5440550148901987293 | 129 | 13.3% | |
| custom 5249287919406961120 | 115 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5019499171841836094 | 98 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5224426359480145264 | 94 | 9.68% | |
| custom 5440653923901797137 | 73 | 7.52% | |
| 🕊 | 73 | 7.52% | |
| custom 5334825435807114982 | 49 | 5.05% | |
| custom 5440495010111842767 | 41 | 4.22% | |
| custom 5458515546129571836 | 35 | 3.60% | |
| custom 5346069058892618918 | 22 | 2.27% | |
| custom 5426840351300158249 | 20 | 2.06% | |
| custom 5346030352647343822 | 19 | 1.96% | |
| custom 5429604171345069565 | 19 | 1.96% | |
| custom 5440559516225661466 | 14 | 1.44% | |
| custom 5346047566876270982 | 11 | 1.13% | |
| custom 5442692061977415086 | 11 | 1.13% | |
| custom 5345911944693964738 | 9 | 0.927% | |
| custom 5445300786458296744 | 9 | 0.927% |
Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 971reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2025 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
продам, писать сюда @angelic505
🕊24custom 534603035264734382211custom 53460690588926189189custom 54296041713450695657custom 54268403513001582496custom 53460475668762709825custom 54426920619774150865custom 53459119446939647384
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
custom 53460303526473438222
Photo, posted without a caption
🕊35custom 53460690588926189189custom 54296041713450695659custom 53460303526473438226custom 53460475668762709826custom 54268403513001582496custom 54426920619774150866custom 53459119446939647385
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 523786956846192023564custom 501949917184183609457custom 522442635948014526454custom 544049501011184276725custom 544055014890198729322custom 533482543580711498221custom 545851554612957183620custom 54268403513001582498
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 524928791940696112062custom 544065392390179713756custom 544055014890198729354custom 533482543580711498228custom 501949917184183609425custom 522442635948014526424custom 53460690588926189184custom 54296041713450695653
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 523786956846192023566custom 524928791940696112053custom 544055014890198729353custom 544065392390179713717custom 501949917184183609416custom 522442635948014526416custom 544049501011184276716custom 545851554612957183615
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @irlclove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,167,540 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“overthinking” (@irlclove), 13 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irlclove.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.