شب جمعه تون پر از عشق و آرامش❤️ @irfalodeh 🍧
🥰9❤8🤩7🐳2👌2

Channel
@irfalodeh
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
111,389subscribers
+28,609 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001247825813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irfalodeh |
| Description | 🔶برای فال و مشاوره شخصی به آیدی زیر پیام بدید : @banoyeh_fal وَجَعَلنامِن بَینِ اَیدیهِم سَداًومِن خَلفِهِم سَداًفَاَغشَیناهُم فَهُم لایُبصِرون🌻 . تابع قوانین جمهوری اسلامی ایران🇮🇷 . رضایت مشتری👇 @irFalodeh_Rezayat |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 54 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irfalodeh |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @irfalodeh/131920 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC | @tafalbaghoran3/1566363 Nov 2026, 15:35 UTC | 0.99 | 2.0 hours |
| @irfalodeh/131918 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC | @tafalbaghoran3/1566353 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC | 0.99 | 4.0 hours |
| @irfalodeh/131973 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 05:15 UTC | @tafalbaghoran3/1566915 Nov 2026, 07:16 UTC | 0.99 | 2.0 hours |
| @irfalodeh/131931 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 04:45 UTC | @tafalbaghoran3/1566584 Nov 2026, 08:54 UTC | 0.99 | 4.2 hours |
| @irfalodeh/131930 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 04:45 UTC | @tafalbaghoran3/1566574 Nov 2026, 08:53 UTC | 0.99 | 4.1 hours |
| @irfalodeh/132161 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC | @tafalbaghoran3/15696111 Nov 2026, 15:30 UTC | 0.98 | 5.9 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @tafalbaghoran3 | 36 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 4.0 hours | this entry (34–2) |
| @faleRozane_eh | 30 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | 39 hours | @faleRozane_eh (28–2) |
| @fallroozenergymosbat | 16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 1.7 hours | this entry (16–0) |
| @fal_maral | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | 2.5 hours | this entry (13–1) |
| @shah_fal | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 46 hours | @shah_fal (6–3) |
| @falmehrbano | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 3 days | @falmehrbano (4–2) |
| @Magicfall | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 24 hours | this entry (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 43 of the 43 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,222 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 18:10 | 111,389 | -660 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 13:36 | 112,049 | -575 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 00:16 | 112,624 | -257 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:11 | 112,881 | -248 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:31 | 113,129 | -194 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:38 | 113,323 | -175 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:27 | 113,498 | -146 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:55 | 113,644 | -162 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:59 | 113,806 | -220 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:51 | 114,026 | -144 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:04 | 114,170 | -186 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 114,356 | -267 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:44 | 114,623 | -253 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:31 | 114,876 | -204 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:00 | 115,080 | -192 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:44 | 115,272 | -159 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 115,431 | -201 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 115,632 | -289 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 115,921 | -320 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:20 | 116,241 | first reading |
2,199 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 167 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 760 of 762 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,199 (11 August 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,873,945 |
| Reactions total | 38,768 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 18:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 146 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54,647 reactions across 997 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14,691 | 26.9% | |
| 👍 | 4,907 | 8.98% | |
| 🙏 | 4,749 | 8.69% | |
| 😍 | 4,687 | 8.58% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4,614 | 8.44% | |
| 🥰 | 4,499 | 8.23% | |
| 👌 | 4,206 | 7.70% | |
| 🔥 | 4,072 | 7.45% | |
| 🤩 | 3,796 | 6.95% | |
| 🐳 | 3,793 | 6.94% | |
| 👏 | 158 | 0.289% | |
| 👎 | 67 | 0.123% | |
| 💔 | 65 | 0.119% | |
| 🍓 | 58 | 0.106% | |
| 🤔 | 51 | 0.093% | |
| 💯 | 47 | 0.086% | |
| 😁 | 30 | 0.055% | |
| 😐 | 26 | 0.048% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 0.042% | |
| 😭 | 22 | 0.04% | |
| 24 further kinds | 86 | 0.157% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 997 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54,647 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 October 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 762 posts held from the last 30 days (0.394%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
شب جمعه تون پر از عشق و آرامش❤️ @irfalodeh 🍧
🥰9❤8🤩7🐳2👌2
❈ 📢 یک خبر عاشقانه برای فردا 💌 شنبه 23 آبان 1405 @irfalodeh 🍧 ❅✾❅ 🌷 فروردین 🌧 ❅✾❅ فردا یک اتفاق هیجان انگیز تو را وارد ماجرای عاشقانه ای جذاب می کند. ❅✾❅ 🌻 اردیبهشت 🌦 ❅✾❅ فردا فرصت مناسبی برای ابراز عشق به عشقتان است و روز فوق العاده ای برای شما خواهد شد. ❅✾❅ 💐خرداد ☀️ ❅✾❅ فردا در این حوزه نقطه آغاز شروعی خاص و فوق العاده است . ❅✾❅ 🌹 تیر ⛅️ ❅✾❅ فردا به فردی که مدت ها به فکر او بودی خواهی رسید و روز عاشقانه ای …
❤8🙏7🔥5👍4❤🔥2🥰2👌1
💢 فال #شبانه جمعه 22 آبان 1405 @irfalodeh 🍧 •┄┅🌒 متولد فروردین ┅┄• 🔸سطح انرژی کلی شما: 72% 🔸 ستاره شما 32 درجه جنوبی 🔸سفر در پيش داري ، خودتان را براي مسافرتي هيجان انگيز آماده كن. قبل از خواب شير ميل كن. •┄┅🌒 متولد اردیبهشت ┅┄• 🔸سطح انرژی کلی شما: 77% 🔸 ستاره شما 127 درجه جنوبی 🔸آنقدر پیشرفت می کنی که نامت بر سر زبان ها می افتد. در علم و تحصیل بکوش که در این راه با تو قیاس نیست. اما هوشیار باش حسد ورزان زیر پایت …
❤9❤🔥9🐳8👍4🤩4🍓2🙏2🔥1
🌝 فال PMC 🗓 جمعه 22 آبان 1405 @irfalodeh 🍧 📺 متولدین مهر ماه امروز در مرکز توجه خواهید بود و قدرت بیان بسیار بالایی خواهید داشت. می توانید به سادگی اطرافیان را جذب کرده و آنها را تحت تأثیر قرار دهید. به طوری که می توانید به راحتی بحث را در هر جمعی کنترل کنید و یا حتی در یک جلسه سخنرانی کنید. بهتر است امروز بدون برنامه ریزی به دوست اجتماعی خود ابراز عشق نکنید، نتیجه خوبی برای این کار پیش بینی نمی شود. مواظب رمز کار…
❤18🔥14🥰12❤🔥10👌7😍2👍1🙏1
🌝 فال PMC 🗓 جمعه 22 آبان 1405 📺 متولدین فروردین ماه هفته بسیار خوبی را پشت سر گذاشته اید. بسیاری از کارها همان طور که می خواستید پیش رفته اند و امروز می توانید با خیال آسوده در خانه استراحت کنید. روز خیلی خوبی برای ورزش کردن است. می توانید در باشگاه و یک رشته ورزشی گروهی ثبت نام کنید تا علاوه بر نتایج سلامتی، دوستان جدیدی نیز پیدا کنید. در بخشی از روز حتی می توانید برخی از پروژه های نیمه کاره خود را به اتمام برسا…
❤22😍16👍9🤩7🥰6❤🔥5🐳5
❤️💔 #فال_کات شده ها ✨این فال مختص دوستانیِ که شریکشون رفته ومیخوان دلیل رفتن، ✔️بازگشت ،رقیب، ✔️دعا،یا ازدواجِ ✔️اون فردباشما هست یانه ✔️مخالف داره رابطه شما و خیییلی ✔️چیزای دیگه گفته میشه همراه باوعده زمانی 450 تومان @banoyeh_fal
👌12🔥12❤9😍8🥰5🤩3❤🔥2👍2
چشاتو ببند اسکرین شات بگیر رو هر کدوم وایساد اون تکست برای توعه...!!!💫🤍 @irfalodeh 🍧
🥰17❤11❤🔥11👍8😍7🙏5🔥3🤩3
فال احساسی ❤️🍒☕️ @irfalodeh 🍧 ❤️ فروردین یه نفر هنوز نتونسته از فکرت بیرون بره. شاید بینتون سکوت افتاده، ولی این سکوت به معنی فراموشی نیست. احتمال یک پیام یا تماس غیرمنتظره دیده میشه. فقط عجله نکن؛ این بار باید طرف مقابل قدم برداره. ❤️ اردیبهشت دلت از یک رابطه خسته شده، اما هنوز ته قلبت امید داری. کسی هست که دوست داره دوباره بهت نزدیک بشه، ولی غرورش اجازه نمیده. یک گفتوگوی مهم میتونه تکلیف احساساتت رو روشن کنه.…
❤39😍11🥰9❤🔥6👌6🤩6🐳5👍4
🌟 فال #کائنات جمعه 22 آبان 1405 @irfalodeh 🍧 •┄┅🌦 متولد فروردین ┅┄• راههای خوبی پیش رو دارید و موفقیت بی شکی پیش رو دارید ولی از ادامه راه خسته نشوید زیرا همه چیز را از دست خواهید داد •┄┅🌦 متولد اردیبهشت ┅┄• نفع شما در این چیزی نیست که بر آن پا فشاری می کنید. راه و مسیر پیشرفت را درست تشخیص دهید خوشبختی انتظارتان را می کشد . •┄┅🌦 متولد خرداد ┅┄• هرگز از کاری که می کنید مایوس نباشید و به آنچه که دارید قناعت کنید چو…
❤26👌10🙏10👍8🐳7🔥7🥰6❤🔥5
❤️ فال صوتی روزانه ❤️ 👼 متولد #اسفند برای گرفتن فال شخصی به آیدی زیر پیام بدید👇👇 @banoyeh_fal
❤21🙏12❤🔥10👍4🔥4🥰4😍4🤩2
❤️ فال صوتی روزانه ❤️ 👼 متولد #بهمن برای گرفتن فال شخصی به آیدی زیر پیام بدید👇👇 @banoyeh_fal
❤14🙏12😍11🔥7👍6👌3🥰3❤🔥2
❤️ فال صوتی روزانه ❤️ 👼 متولد #دی برای گرفتن فال شخصی به آیدی زیر پیام بدید👇👇 @banoyeh_fal
❤20🤩10👍8👌6🥰4😍3❤🔥2🐳2
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,199 posts we hold for @irfalodeh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
یه تخفیف بذارم براتون 🥰
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 October 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فال و طالع روزانه” (@irfalodeh), 111,389 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irfalodeh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.