Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ирен Эшли, а когда прода?

@iren_ashley

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

598subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001732114193
TypeChannel
Username@iren_ashley
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iren_ashley

Growth

5986046017 August 2026 — 604 subscribers7 August 2026 — 604 subscribers14 August 2026 — 598 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 597–605 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:05598-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:17604no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:57604first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 24 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,111 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥27624.8%
23521.2%
custom 5255834342919269080988.82%
❤‍🔥958.55%
😍887.92%
😁807.20%
🤣726.48%
custom 5888757495505095853635.67%
👍484.32%
🙏232.07%
custom 5215400958153999508121.08%
👀121.08%
💋30.27%
🤯30.27%
😭20.18%
🎉10.09%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 27 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Feb 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,200 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Меня определенно пугают нововведения Литнета 🤣

👀7🤯3

25 Jan 2026, 18:45 UTC≈1,390 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Было почти тысяча... Разгребаю понемногу уведомления на Литнете, читаю переписку с менеджерами, отвечаю на комментарии. Столько нововведений! И дизайн новый. Капец. Столько всего... надо привыкнуть. Думаю как лучше вернуться, потому что я пока отошла от писательской движухи. И вообще не знаю как вести соцсети... Что вам вообще интересно было бы узнать/почитать? И, ребят, кто остался со мной. Лучшие! Спасибо!

🔥17👀52

25 Jan 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,110 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что-то я писательство вообще забросила. Непорядок. Надо думать как возвращать эту сферу жизни в свою нынешнюю реальность.

❤‍🔥6custom 58887574955050958533👍2

31 Dec 2025, 21:23 UTC≈1,080 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

С Новым годом!!!🎉🎆

❤‍🔥15👍84

27 Nov 2025, 11:38 UTC≈1,280 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @litnetknigiPhoto

Друзья, благодарим вас за участие в нашем розыгрыше! В следующий понедельник — 1 декабря, совместно с Ирен Эшли мы дополнительно разыграем одну печатную версию книги «Трофей тёмного короля» среди всех, кто оставил комментарии с ответами на вопросы к посту по ссылке. Победитель будет выбран случайным образом. Доставка книги — по всей России. Желаем всем удачи! ❤️ P.S. В нашем офисе уже появился претендент на книжн

9😍4🔥3

24 Nov 2025, 16:03 UTC879 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @litnetknigiPhoto

📣 Друзья, мы рады объявить о новом розыгрыше! Совместно с автором Ирен Эшли дарим книжный бокс с печатной версией книги «Трофей темного короля». ❤️‍🔥 Для участия в розыгрыше необходимо ответить на три вопроса по мотивам романа: 1. Как называется первый месяц зимы в Вилдхейме? 2. К какому празднику начинают готовиться в Эдильборге в день, когда зацвели примулы? 3. Как называют мальчиков, которые рождаются с душой е

8🔥5😍3

28 Oct 2025, 19:00 UTC≈1,010 views129 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👄 "Мне не нужны оправдания, мне нужны результаты" Я начала ЧИТАТЬ "Дьявол носит Prada". Да-да, нашумевший роман Лорен Вайсбергер, той самой писательницы, которая некоторое время работала помощницей у Анна Винтур, главного редактора журнала Vogue. 🤩 Что я хочу вам сказать? Круто написано! Очень отличается от одноименного фильма.

🔥4733custom 525583434291926908025❤‍🔥7custom 52154009581539995087custom 58887574955050958536👍4

28 Oct 2025, 11:06 UTC751 views114 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я посмотрела первую серию реалити про писателей и у меня важный вопрос: а как попасть во второй сезон? 😊

🔥4232🤣24custom 58887574955050958537😁4custom 52558343429192690804❤‍🔥1

27 Oct 2025, 11:36 UTC624 views118 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🗣️: надо писать книгу и заниматься редактурой Тем временем я: 💅💅💅 А вы чем занимаетесь?)

🔥44😁30custom 5888757495505095853247❤‍🔥6custom 52154009581539995084custom 52558343429192690803

26 Oct 2025, 17:35 UTC551 views117 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ну я

😁46🔥33🤣2311❤‍🔥3custom 52154009581539995081

25 Oct 2025, 15:48 UTC487 views131 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Мощь 🌊💫

55😍37custom 525583434291926908031❤‍🔥5🔥3

25 Oct 2025, 15:47 UTC405 views118 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня было красиво 🌊 Как я люблю море! Стояла на берегу, смотрела на бесконечную серо-голубую гладь — и чувствовала, как возвращается вдохновение. 💫

43❤‍🔥37custom 525583434291926908034🔥2🎉1custom 58887574955050958531

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @iren_ashley. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,195,690 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ирен Эшли, а когда прода?” (@iren_ashley), 598 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iren_ashley.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.