Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 96 days, net +52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,408–3,476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 08:46
3,468
+8
6 Nov 2026, 20:01
3,460
-5
3 Nov 2026, 09:59
3,465
-1
31 Oct 2026, 10:36
3,466
-1
28 Oct 2026, 12:54
3,467
+8
25 Oct 2026, 04:17
3,459
+4
21 Oct 2026, 21:05
3,455
+3
18 Oct 2026, 22:04
3,452
+2
15 Oct 2026, 14:00
3,450
-1
12 Oct 2026, 04:59
3,451
+9
5 Oct 2026, 06:01
3,442
+8
27 Sept 2026, 00:37
3,434
+12
2 Sept 2026, 23:03
3,422
+1
31 Aug 2026, 02:04
3,421
+4
28 Aug 2026, 05:43
3,417
-3
25 Aug 2026, 05:36
3,420
-2
19 Aug 2026, 13:12
3,422
-2
16 Aug 2026, 08:17
3,424
-2
12 Aug 2026, 13:23
3,426
+7
9 Aug 2026, 15:16
3,419
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
8
66.7%
❤
2
16.7%
👎
2
16.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️کانون کارگزاران بورس و اوراق بهادار، در پی انتشار خبری با عنوان «سود خالص ۷۷ هزار میلیارد تومانی کارگزاریها»، ضمن تکذیب ارقام و ادعاهای مطرحشده، اعلام میدارد:
اطلاعات منتشرشده در این خبر، فاقد مبنای دقیق، مستند و قابل اتکا بوده و برداشت نادرستی از عملکرد صنعت کارگزاری ارائه میدهد. ارقام ذکرشده در خصوص سود خالص، درآمدهای کارمزدی و سایر شاخصهای مالی، با واقعیتهای موجود در صورتهای مالی شرکتهای کارگزاری و گز…
📌 گزارش کارگروهها | گفتوگو با رؤسای کارگروههای تخصصی کانون کارگزاران بورس و اوراق بهادار «پارت دوم»
🔹 در این گزارش، مصاحبهای با رؤسای کارگروههای تخصصی کانون، در خصوص مهمترین اقدامات انجامشده و موضوعات در اولویت پیگیری انجام شد.
📋 کارگروههای حاضر در پارت دوم این گزارش عبارتاند از:
▪️ کارگروه صندوقهای بازارگردانی
▪️ کارگروه مطالعات تطبیقی بازار سرمایه
▪️ کارگروه اوراق بدهی
▪️ کارگروه امور معاملات بورس انر…
📌گزارش کارگروهها | گفتوگو با رؤسای کارگروههای تخصصی کانون کارگزاران بورس و اوراق بهادار«پارت اول»
🔹 در این گزارش، مصاحبه ای با رؤسای کارگروههای تخصصی کانون، در خصوص مهمترین اقدامات انجامشده و موضوعات در اولویت پیگیری انجام شد.
📋 کارگروههای حاضر در پارت اول این گزارش عبارتاند از:
▪️ کارگروه حقوقی
▪️ کارگروه تأمین مالی جمعی
▪️ کارگروه مدیریت ریسک و توسعه صنعت کارگزاری
▪️ کارگروه نظارت و کنترلهای داخلی
▪️ کا…
سی و دومین جلسه کمیته سازش در خصوص پروندههای کالایی
🗓️ سه شنبه ۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
موضوع جلسه:
۱. مطالبه خسارت ناشی از اختلاف قیمت
۲. مطالبه وجه بیشتر از قیمت انجام شده در بورس کالا
۳. مطالبه خسارت ناشی از تأخیر و یا عدم تحویل کالا
@iranseba
سی و یکمین جلسه کمیته سازش در خصوص پروندههای ناشران
🗓️ دوشنبه ۵ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
موضوع جلسه:
۱. رفع توثیق سهام
۲. مطالبه خسارت
۳. مطالبه سود اوراق بهادار
@iranseba
جلسه کارگروه تخصصی امور معاملات و پس از معاملات و پس از معاملات سهام
🗓️یکشنبه ۴ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
موضوع کارگروه:
۱. ارائه طریق در خصوص ابطال معاملات سبدها و اشخاص ممنوع از معامله در ابزار مشتقه
@iranseba
سیامین جلسه کمیته سازش در خصوص پروندههای اوراق
🗓️ یکشنبه ۴ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
موضوع جلسه:
۱. مطالبه وجه حاصل از فروش سهام
۲. استرداد سهام- بطلان معاملات
۳. رفع فریز سهام
۴. مطالبه خسارت
@iranseba
ششمین جلسه کارگروه تخصصی امور معاملات بورس انرژی
🗓️شنبه ۳ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
موضوع کارگروه:
۱. بررسی موضوعات راهکارهای توسعه بازار برق و زیرساختهای آن
@iranseba
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @iranseba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
استخدام در نهادهای مالی - کانون کارگزاران @SEBAemployment · 26,807 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
استخدام بانک ها | ایران استخدام @iranestekhdam24_bank · 35,942 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
🎓 صدای دانشگاه 🎓 @sedaye_daneshgaah · 19,999 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
صدای بورس @sedayebourse · 25,429 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 September 2026
اخبارلحظه ای @akhbarelahzei_ir · 204,550 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانون کارگزاران بورس و اوراق بهادار” (@iranseba), 3,468 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iranseba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.