«سوپر النینو» مبنای علمی ندارد 🔻این روزها اصطلاح «سوپر النینو» حسابی سر زبانها افتاده است. پدیدهای که خبرها درباره آن بیشتر از یک هشدار معمولی باعث نگرانی و دلهره مردم شده است. 🔻محمد اصغری، کارشناس هواشناسی در گفتوگو با اقتصاد معاصر ضمن غیر علمی خواندن گزاره سوپر النینو، میگوید وقوع النینو حتی به صورت بسیار قوی نهایتا باعث افزایش نسبی بارندگی در نوار مرکزی کشور و دامنههای جنوبی البرز میشود. @iranfori

Channel
ایران فوری
@iranfori
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,320subscribers
-94 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002239549627 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @iraneforii @iranfori |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iranfori |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 5,320 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 5,334 | -32 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 5,366 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 5,373 | -30 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:20 | 5,403 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:10 | 5,408 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 5,414 | first reading |
Engagement
136 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.16%
- avg views ÷ 5,320 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 168
- 136 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.744%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 136
- of 136 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 58 of 136 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 136 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,849 |
| Reactions total | 94 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 37m 57s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
94 reactions across 57 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 25.5% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 22.3% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 17.0% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 11.7% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 8.51% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 4.26% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.19% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 1.06% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 1.06% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 136 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
‼ وزیر خارجه اسرائیل در شبکه ۱۴ رژیم: ارتش اسرائیل در حال حاضر با کمبود نیرو مواجه است @iranfori
سردارنقدی: تولیدات موشکی و پهپادی ما تمامی ندارد مشاور عالی فرمانده کل سپاه: 🔻ما بیش از نواخت شلیک موشکهای بالستیک تولید میکنیم و به دست رزمندگان اسلام میرسانیم. 🔻اگر جنگ چند سال هم طول بکشد، باز هم موشکهای بالستیک ما بر سر دشمن فرود خواهند آمد.| صداوسیما @iranfori
اعتراف روبیو به قربانی کردن آینده کوبا در پیشگاه منافع آمریکا 🔻من مطمئنم که تا پایان این دوره ریاست جمهوری، کوبا در مسیری غیرقابل بازگشت به سوی آیندهای بسیار متفاوت قرار خواهد گرفت. 🔻من همیشه به مردم میگویم که نمیتوان چیزی را به مدت ۷۰ سال حفظ کرد. این چیزها ریشه میدوانند. و بعد، نمیتوان انتظار داشت که یکشبه، همه چیز را از جا بکَنید و چیز کاملاً جدیدی را جایگزین آن کنید. یک دوره گذار وجود دارد که باید اتفاق ب…
مخفیشدن ترامپ در کامیون حمل غذا از ترس ایران سوژه شد 🔻گزارشها دربارۀ خروج مخفیانۀ ترامپ از ترکیه و جابهجایی او با یک کامیون حمل غذا، موجی از شوخیهای کاربران در فضای مجازی به راه انداخته است. 🔻روز هشتم ژوئیه (۱۸ خرداد)، پس از برگزاری اجلاس ناتو در ترکیه، رئیسجمهور آمریکا در حالی که کاخ سفید همچنان مدعی بود او با هواپیمای «ایر فورس وان» در حال سفر است، ظاهراً از ترس تهدیدهای ایران بیسروصدا و با یک هواپیمای نظام…
ادعاهای مضحک ترامپ جنایتکار درباره ایران: «من به ایران اعتماد ندارم؛ من آخرین کسی هستم که به ایران اعتماد کند. آنها دائماً به من دروغ گفتهاند. 🔻 ما در حال حاضر کنترل کامل تنگه هرمز را در اختیار داریم. آنها کنترلی بر آن ندارند؛ ما کنترل کامل را داریم. این منطقه در اختیار ماست. 🔻 شاید در مقطعی آنها دست به اقدامی بزنند؛ در آن صورت با پاسخ سختی مواجه خواهند شد. اما در حال حاضر، ما در موقعیت بسیار خوبی قرار داریم. 🔻 م…
ادعای ترامپ جنایتکار درباره تهدیدات ایران به ترور علیه او: 🔻من در مورد هیچ چیز نگران نیستم، صادقانه بگویم - هر چه که باشد. 🔻شما نگرش من را می دانید: هر چه باشد. @iranfori
❤1
پرزیدنت ترامپ جنایتکار درباره تهدیدات علیه خود: من تعجب نمی کنم. من تهدیدهای زیادی دارم که شما از آنها خبر ندارید. 🔻هر رئیسجمهوری تبعی تهدیدات زیادی دارد. رؤسای جمهور بی نتیجه تهدید نمی شوند. 🔻من فکر می کنم که من ممکن است مهم ترین رئیس جمهور باشم. هیچ کس بیش از من در یک دوره تقریباً شش ساله کار نکرده است. @iranfori
اظهارات ترامپ در مورد تغییر هواپیما در آنکارا به دلیل یک تهدید: این موضوع فقط به عهده سرویس مخفی است. 🔻من فقط آنچه را که آنها میخواهند انجام دهند، دنبال میکنم. بنابراین، من به توصیههای سرویس مخفی و ارتش عمل میکنم 🔻آنها میخواستند من از یک پرواز و یک هواپیمای دیگر استفاده کنم، با همان سطح ایمنی، اما آنها میخواستند که من این کار را انجام دهم، بنابراین من آن را انجام دادم. من آنچه را که به من میگویند، انجام مید…
ادعاهای بی اساس ترامپ: مساله ایران خوب پیش میرود، واقعاً خیلی خوب 🔻ما کنترل کامل تنگه هرمز را در اختیار داریم! کنترل آن دست ماست. هیچکس دیگری، فقط ما. 🔻نیروی دریایی ما فوقالعاده است و اوضاع برای کشورمان عالی پیش میرود! @iranfori
❤1
‼ دونالد ترامپ در حال حاضر در ایالت اوهایو حضور دارد تا در فینال Patriot Games 2026 شرکت کند! @iranfori
‼ ایلان ماسک: پایگاه ماه آلفا شگفت انگیز خواهد بود. ما این پایگاه را طوری خواهیم ساخت تا هرکی بخواد بتونه به ماه بره. @iranfori
Showing the 12 most recent of 136 posts we hold for @iranfori. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 187,937 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@sahamedalatbours · 11,96156 postsعرضه اولیه
@arzebours · 19,58123 postsاخبار البرز
@alborzpres · 420 postsاخبار اردبیل
@ardebilpress · 420 postsاخبار ایلام
@ilampress1 · 420 postsاخبار اصفهان
@isfahanpres · 520 postsاخبار آذربایجان شرقی
@tabrizpres · 12120 postsاخبار آذربایجان غربی
@urmiapress1 · 5920 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ایران فوری” (@iranfori), 5,320 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iranfori.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.