Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 44 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,260–1,270 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 12:58
1,269
+3
11 Sept 2026, 17:17
1,266
+5
7 Sept 2026, 03:57
1,261
-3
30 Aug 2026, 01:34
1,264
+1
20 Aug 2026, 23:56
1,263
+1
17 Aug 2026, 13:09
1,262
+1
10 Aug 2026, 14:28
1,261
-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:51
1,262
+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:30
1,261
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:25
1,261
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 27 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
642 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
433
67.4%
❤
168
26.2%
🔥
16
2.49%
😁
13
2.02%
👎
6
0.935%
🎉
3
0.467%
😢
2
0.312%
😱
1
0.156%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 642 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2023 to 12 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
کاربری توییت کرده که سه وعده غذایی رایگان علاوه بر هتل رایگان در نیویورک برای اونایی که غیرقانونی میان آمریکا و...و کلی از این وضعیت انتقاد کرده
ایلان ماسک هم جواب داده کالیفرنیا هم هفته قبل خدمات درمانی رو برای افرادی که غیرقانونی میان رایگان کرده
@iranelonmusk_twitter
همانطور که میدونید اخیرا خبری منتشر شد و در اون اتهام مصرف مواد مخدر به ایلان ماسک زده شد...
حالا ایلان ماسک در پاسخ توییتی اینجوری گفته که اون و همه کارمندان اسپیس ایکس تست های رندومی که از طرف ناسا برای چک کردن مصرف مواد مخدر انجام میشه رو گذروندن و یجورایی اون خبر رو تکذیب کرد.
@iranelonmusk
@iranelonmusk_twitter
مت والاس در ریپلای به این توییت ایلان نوشت:
فرود روی ماه، قابل توجه ترین (بزرگترین) دستاورد تاریخ بشر است، اگر جعلی بود، روسیه هرگز دست از تحقیق و فریاد نمی کشید، آنها می دانستند که واقعی است.
ناسا در طول این فرآیند همچنین برخی از شگفت انگیزترین چیزهایی را که امروز همه ما دوست داریم داشته باشیم، اختراع/کشف کرد.
@iranelonmusk_twitter
ایلان ماسک با استفاده از یک میم، به افرادی که به مأموریت فرود در ماه شک میکنند و از صحت ویدئوها و تصاویر فرود در ماه مطمئن نیستند، یادآوری کرد که در آن زمان CGI آنقدر پیشرفت نکرده بود.
@iranelonmusk_twitter
ایلان ماسک در پاسخ به این توییت:
تعداد اجرام پرتاب شده به فضا در سال 2022🚀:
🇺🇸 ایالات متحده آمریکا: ۱,۷۹۶
🇨🇳 چین: ۱۳۱
🇬🇧 انگلستان: ۷۱
🇷🇺 روسیه: ۴۶
🇳🇿 نیوزیلند: ۱۱
🇮🇹 ایتالیا: ۹
🇪🇸 اسپانیا: ۹
🇱🇺 لوکزامبورگ: ۹
🇺🇾 اروگوئه: ۹
🇫🇷 فرانسه: ۸
🇰🇷 کره جنوبی: ۸
🇨🇦 کانادا: ۷
🇮🇳 هند: ۶
🇯🇵 ژاپن: ۵
🇫🇮 فنلاند: ۴
🇨🇱 شیلی: ۳
🇸🇬 سنگاپور: ۳
🇩🇪 آلمان: ۲
🇨🇿 جمهوری چک: ۲
🇹🇷 ترکیه: ۲
🇳🇴 نروژ: ۲
🇿🇦 آفریقای جنوبی: ۲
🇦🇪 امارات متحده عربی: ۲
🇮…
🔷️اکانت توییتر تسلا از مرز ۲۰ میلیون فالوور عبور کرده است.
🔶️این نه تنها چندین برابر خودروسازان دیگر هست، بلکه از سایر برندهای پیشرو مانند اپل، فیسبوک و آمازون نیز جلوتر است.
@iranelonmusk_twitter
لایک شده توسط ایلان ماسک:
بدترین اتفاق ۳ سال اخیر این است که چگونه "روزنامه نگاری علمی" از درک مفاهیم پیچیده علمی به یک عمل حرفه ای ساده برای احمق تر کردن جمعیت و اطاعت بیشتر نسبت به طبقه متخصص تبدیل شده است.
@iranelonmusk_twitter
👍21
Signed mr.x
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @iranelonmusk_twitter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ایلان ماسک | توییت ها” (@iranelonmusk_twitter), 1,269 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iranelonmusk_twitter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.