Правда жизни от миллениалов 😃
💯8😁8🤣3

Channel
@iraleadership
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
116subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001979615288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iraleadership |
| Description | Место для историй про мир ИТ, профессию продакта и просто жизнь. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iraleadership |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 116 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 116 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (11 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 722 |
| Reactions total | 78 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
188 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 46 | 24.5% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 21.8% | |
| ❤ | 40 | 21.3% | |
| 💯 | 26 | 13.8% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 7.98% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 5.32% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 1.06% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.532% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.532% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Правда жизни от миллениалов 😃
💯8😁8🤣3
Мы перестали понимать, что такое софт-скиллы. Каждый раз, когда читаю вакансию с фразой «ищем человека с сильными софт-скиллами», хочется спросить: А что именно вы имеете в виду? Потому что слишком часто под этим подразумевают не навыки, а просто приятного человека. «Он спокойный.» «Он со всеми ладит.» «Он никогда не конфликтует.» «К нему можно прийти с любой проблемой.» Но это не софт-скиллы. Это особенности ха…
💯7❤1🔥1
https://t.me/irena_ponaroshku/20697
😁6
Самую неожиданную доставку кофе я встретила… на обычной парковой лавочке. ☕️ Гуляла по парку в Алматы. Вокруг деревья, цветы, белки, тишина. Ни одной кофейни. Села отдохнуть и вдруг замечаю на спинке лавочки металлическую табличку с QR-кодом. Думаю: «Ну реклама и реклама». Подхожу ближе, а там: «Сканируй QR и заказывай прямо к скамейке». То есть ты просто сидишь в парке, выбираешь кофе, оплачиваешь — и тебе ег…
🔥5👍3🤗2❤1
2 года, как один миг
🔥19❤1
Я думала, что лупу включила, а это ТуТу решили отличиться в отображении шэринга 🤣 Забавно, что недавно обсуждали с командой, что у нас есть элементы, которые сложно тапнуть (для толстых пальчиков), но оказалось, что в толстые элементы ещё сложнее попасть.
😁5👀3
Плохие новости: ChatGPT уже умнее тебя. Хорошие — это больше не главное. Недавно слушала Александра Аузана (декана экономфака МГУ), и меня зацепил один эксперимент, который сейчас проводят в университете. Студентам предлагают решать задачи с помощью ИИ. Не на скорость и не по принципу «кто умнее» — человек или нейросеть. Цель другая: понять, какие человеческие навыки делают связку «человек + ИИ» действительно силь…
❤3👍2
Продакты — не проджекты. Именно поэтому нас нельзя оценивать одинаковыми критериями. У проджекта есть понятная цель: реализовать известное решение в срок, в бюджет и с нужным качеством. У продакта другая задача. Найти решение, которое вообще стоит реализовывать. А это невозможно сделать без экспериментов. По сути работа продакта — это непрерывная цепочка гипотез. А если сделать так? А если проблема вообще в др…
💯11❤3👍2
Наболело 🙈
😁7
Слушала интервью с сооснователем Splat на канале Основатели. Он сказал, что как CEO ведёт 20–25 человек напрямую. 20–25 прямых подчинённых. И держится это не на том, что он какой-то сверхчеловек, способный провести 17 one-to-one до обеда. А в том числе на одной простой штуке. Он даёт сотрудникам инструкцию к себе. Как формулировать вопросы. Какого уровня сложности проблемы приносить сразу, а какие сначала прожев…
❤8🔥7
Взять дэй офф в пятницу было лучшим решением недели!
❤13👍4🥰1
AdTech в 2026 году: деньги ушли, сломался подход Венчурное финансирование эдтека рухнуло на 89% с пика 2021 года. Хочу порассуждать почему. Например, я сейчас прохожу курс по повышению квалификации и вижу, как часть материала уже устарела в момент записи. Юнит-экономика в экселе, калькуляторы, которые надо заполнять руками, прототипы на странных сайтах, серьезно? Если сейчас я просто обращаюсь к ИИ (клоду, кодексу…
👍4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @iraleadership. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ира Вострикова|Продукты, лидерство, жизнь” (@iraleadership), 116 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iraleadership.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.