Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BlackCode | کد سیاه

@ir_blackcode

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,624subscribers

+74 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002281949940
TypeChannel
Username@ir_blackcode
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ir_blackcode

Growth

3,5503,6243,5876 August 2026 — 3,550 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,582 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,624 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,539–3,635 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:453,624+42
7 Aug 2026, 09:453,582+32
6 Aug 2026, 19:483,550first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 3,624 subscribers
Avg views / post
577
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held22 (28 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,040
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

205 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9345.4%
🔥3416.6%
👍3316.1%
😁3316.1%
💔62.93%
👨‍💻31.46%
❤‍🔥20.976%
👾10.488%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ir_blackcode. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC3 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @VipTab66Video

🇮🇷به مناسبت شرایط فعلی کشورمون لیستی از بهترین چنل های V.I.P رو که فروشی هستن رو امشب رایگان قرار میدیم فقط تا امشب 👇 #شانس_کسایی_که_آنلاینن

6 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC14 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @VipTab66

فروشگاه ورزشی TST 🔹JOIN همه کتاب های صوتی و پی دی اف... 🔸JOIN اموزش کاریزما و ایده رابطه 🔹JOIN پادکست رایگان انگلیسی 🔸JOIN کاریابی دانشجویی/ درآمدزایی/ استخدام 🔹JOIN ادیتورررررر حرفه ای شو + ابزار رایگان 🔸JOIN هنر خوانش و تحلیل متن 🔹JOIN پلتفرم درمانی شفای زندگی 🔸JOIN آموزش هک و امنیت از سطح صفر 🔹JOIN موفقیت ، استخدامی ، پول پارو کن 🔸JOIN انواع VPN + کانفیگ نامحدود (( رایگان )) 🔹JOIN آگهی رایگان

4 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC296 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

خیلی وقته فعالیتی تو چنل نداریما😊

👍3😁1

21 Jul 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,100 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✈️متا برای کشف یک آسیب‌پذیری افشای اطلاعات، ۷۸ هزار دلار جایزه پرداخت کرد 🎥 شرکت متا به یک پژوهشگر امنیتی به نام رونی کی روی، به‌دلیل کشف یک آسیب‌پذیری مهم در سامانه پشتیبانی خود، ۷۸ هزار دلار جایزه باگ پرداخت کرد. این نقص امنیتی می‌توانست دسترسی غیرمجاز به ایمیل‌ها، گفت‌وگوهای پشتیبانی، جزئیات پرونده‌ها و برخی اطلاعات کاربران را فراهم کند. 🎤این آسیب‌پذیری در ژانویه ۲۰۲۶ گزارش شد، متا آن را در آوریل برطرف کرد و اعل

👍62🔥2

17 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,150 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔴خودتونو برای ملی شدن یا قطعی کامل اینترنت آماده کنید: گفته میشه به دیتاسنترهای کشور آماده‌باش دادن که اگه لازم شد، به‌زودی اینترنت رو خیلی سریع محدود یا قطع کنن؛ گفته میشه به دیتاسنترهای کشور آماده‌باش دادن که اگه اتفاق امنیتی خاصی پیش بیاد، بتونن تو کمترین زمان ممکن اینترنت رو محدود یا حتی قطع کنن. ظاهراً با نزدیک شدن به احتمال بیشتر شدن تنش‌ها، مسئول‌ها دارن سناریوهایی مثل محدود کردن اینترنت بین‌الملل یا اعمال م

💔6👨‍💻3👍2

10 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,310 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

کتاب میخونید؟🤔

  1. اره40%
  2. تا حدی41%
  3. نه28%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5👍1

7 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,450 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

یه کتاب خیلی خفن ، حداقل نظر خودم اینه، زیاد طولانی نیست بیشتر سناریو محور هست به نظر من حتما بخونید @ir_blackcode

7👍2🔥1

6 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,430 views17 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

به زودی براتون چند تا کتاب خفن میزارم راجب مهندسی اجتماعی (هک کردن بدونه دانش فنی) منتظرش باشید... ⚫️

👍8🔥63

6 Jul 2026, 04:04 UTC≈1,510 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁14🔥4👾1

2 Jul 2026, 22:47 UTC≈1,620 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

امنیت شبکه — 🛡️🚫 هیچ‌چیز تو دنیا به اندازه‌ی آدمی که پسورد وای‌فای شرکت رو می‌ذاره 12345678 به شبکه آسیب نمی‌زنه. 💔 هکرها زحمت بکشن؟ نه بابا. خودش رمز رو تقدیم کرده. 🔓 --- ۱. فایروال چیه؟ 🔥 یه دیوار دیجیتالیه که سعی می‌کنه جلوی بدبختی‌ها رو بگیره. 🛑 ولی وقتی کارمندی که داره دانلود فیلم می‌گه: «چرا این سایت باز نمیشه؟!» 🤔🎬 و بعد می‌زنه *Allow All* ✅، اون دیوار نقش کارتن موز خیس‌خورده رو بازی می‌کنه. 🍌💦📦 --- ۲. آپ

😁113🔥3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ir_blackcode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTCAnonymous Poll162 voters

کتاب میخونید؟🤔

  1. اره40%
  2. تا حدی41%
  3. نه28%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 74,763 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 75 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

𝘼𝙁𝙂 𝙋𝙇𝙐𝙎 ‌| ܣܭߺࡉ ߊ‌‌ܩࡅ࣪ߺࡅ࡙ߺࡅߺ߳ࡉ‌
@Afg_Plus · 9,965
6 posts
یادگیری ماندگار لغات انگلیسی
@WWWVocabularyCom · 9,270
5 posts
Book_tips
@book_tips · 21,958
4 posts
🔍دنبال کار🔎
@donbal_kar · 15,082
4 posts
آموزش الایت موشن/اسماعیل مهرجوش
@esmailedit · 11,339
4 posts
️فریلنسر گلد پروژه
@goldenporojehh · 11,532
4 posts
هوش مصنوعی | حسین صادقی
@hoseinsadeghi4013 · 12,603
4 posts
آموزش جذب زنان | دایان
@jazb_dokhtar · 24,234
4 posts
من...هستم
@man_x_hastam · 10,190
4 posts
کودک دو زبانه پرورش دادن سخت نیست
@Online_English_For_Kids · 10,624
4 posts
پروژه ادمینی | دورکاری | VIP
@admiinprojeh · 14,341
3 posts
هوش مصنوعی| علم داده
@AILearnCamp · 16,917
3 posts
طراحی گرافیک /ساخت تصاویر با ai/ابزار ادیت / بارکاو دیزاینر
@barkav_designer · 18,987
3 posts
کوروش گرافیک|CyrusGraphic
@Cyrus_Graphic · 8,962
3 posts
پروژه استخدامی | کارفرما | VIP
@FREELANCERVIIP · 19,785
3 posts
Info Digital
@info_digital66 · 15,458
3 posts
𓆩 IPMan | آی‌پـی‌مَـن
@IPManTeam · 10,145
3 posts
فیلترشکن || پروکسی
@iran_vpn66 · 15,947
3 posts
کاریابی ماجراجو | معرفی کارفرما | پروژه دانشجویی
@KARYABI_MAJARAJOO_W · 7,941
3 posts
Network 4:20🎫
@network_secsnap · 4,981
3 posts
انگلیسی در خانه
@OnlineConversationSchool · 16,643
3 posts
انگلیسی صحبت کن
@phonetic_conversation · 10,709
3 posts
ܭߊ‌‌ܦ߭ܘ ܭࡅߺ߳ߊ‌‌ࡅߺ߲ࡉ
@sacafeketab · 28,224
3 posts
𝙒𝘼𝙉𝙏𝙀𝘿 𝙂𝘼𝙈𝙀𝙍𝙎
@WaNteD_GaMerS · 8,203
3 posts

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

پروژه ادمینی | دورکاری | VIP
@admiinprojeh · 14,341
1 post
ᎪᎥ ᏟᎾᎠᎬ (برنامه نویسی و سورس رایگان)
@Ai_teleegram · 3,645
1 post
هوش مصنوعی| علم داده
@AILearnCamp · 16,917
1 post
امیری هک|| AMIRI_HACK
@AMIRIHACK · 16,932
1 post
Offensive LSO
@BackupLSO · 3,147
1 post
طراحی گرافیک /ساخت تصاویر با ai/ابزار ادیت / بارکاو دیزاینر
@barkav_designer · 18,987
1 post
دستورات ترموکس - Termux
@Bia2Termux · 11,175
1 post
‌🌧⚡️بـًٍۋ℘يٰٰ بـٰٖـــٍٰـارٰٖان⚡️🌧
@bouyebaran · 5,464
1 post
کانفیگ v2ray و Npv
@chanel_v2ray_2 · 4,337
1 post
کوروش گرافیک|CyrusGraphic
@Cyrus_Graphic · 8,962
1 post
🔍دنبال کار🔎
@donbal_kar · 15,082
1 post
Englishtub | انگلیسی آسان با استایل
@Englishtub · 3,451
1 post
آموزش الایت موشن/اسماعیل مهرجوش
@esmailedit · 11,339
1 post
Proxy MTProto | فایر پروکسی
@FireProxy66 · 3,287
1 post
️فریلنسر گلد پروژه
@goldenporojehh · 11,532
1 post
Hack 4҉҈ Man
@Hack4Man · 13,705
1 post
𝐈𝐌𝐎𝐕𝐈𝐄|آیمووی
@Imovie_txt · 12,571
1 post
𓆩 IPMan | آی‌پـی‌مَـن
@IPManTeam · 10,145
1 post
فیلترشکن || پروکسی
@iran_vpn66 · 15,947
1 post
کاریابی ماجراجو | معرفی کارفرما | پروژه دانشجویی
@KARYABI_MAJARAJOO_W · 7,941
1 post
Network 4:20🎫
@network_secsnap · 4,981
1 post
استخدام ادمین | نیلای
@NilayAdmin · 12,330
1 post
پرامتوگرام
@peramtogram · 4,172
1 post
P.F.K Security
@PfkSecurity · 1,955
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BlackCode | کد سیاه” (@ir_blackcode), 3,624 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ir_blackcode.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.