Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 42 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,083–1,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 05:38
1,085
-1
15 Sept 2026, 03:16
1,086
-2
11 Sept 2026, 07:55
1,088
-5
6 Sept 2026, 09:21
1,093
-1
2 Sept 2026, 03:23
1,094
+1
26 Aug 2026, 21:25
1,093
-4
20 Aug 2026, 16:12
1,097
-2
17 Aug 2026, 13:17
1,099
-2
14 Aug 2026, 01:14
1,101
+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:04
1,100
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:27
1,100
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 46s
Average length
1m 35s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
6
54.5%
❤
4
36.4%
👍
1
9.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍕 Пицца, которую ребёнок может приготовить сам. Или вместе с родителями. И да, потом попросит сделать ещё. 😄
Один из моих любимых простых рецептов, который отлично подходит для совместной готовки с детьми.
А дети постарше вполне справятся с ним самостоятельно.
Что понадобится:
🌮 Тонкий лаваш
🧀 Тёртый сыр
🍅 Помидоры (часть нарезать, часть измельчить блендером в соус)
В форму выложить слоями:
лаваш → томатный соус…
Вы замечали, что один вопрос может загнать нас в тупик, а другой помочь найти решение?
Всего одно слово способно изменить ход мыслей.
Почему?
Или
Зачем?
На первый взгляд разница небольшая. Но для мозга она огромная.
Когда мы спрашиваем себя «Почему я так сделал?», мозг часто начинает искать оправдания.
Потому что его задача сохранить целостную картину мира и ощущение, что «я хороший человек». Признать ошибку бы…
На видео полный рассказ про поход с ночёвкой
🏕️ Что мы с сыном взяли в двухдневный поход?
🎒 Взяли в прокат:
✔️ Палатку
✔️ 2 спальника
✔️ 2 туристических коврика
✔️ 2 рюкзака
✔️ Трекинговые палки
🥤 В дорогу:
✔️ 1,5 литра воды на двоих (по пути был родник, и на месте тоже)
✔️ Батончик для сына, чтобы перекусить во время подъёма
🎒 Из дома:
✔️ Купальник и шорты для купания
✔️ Резиновые сланцы для лагеря
✔️ Тонкое пол…
Когда ребенку 9 лет, мотивация иногда выглядит очень неожиданно. 😄
Сын сейчас на уроке вокала поет... «Сикс севен».
Сначала я улыбнулась.
А потом поймала себя на мысли: а какая, собственно, разница, что именно он поет?
Главное, ему это нравится.
Как психолог я часто вижу, что взрослые иногда слишком торопятся сделать «правильно». Мы хотим, чтобы ребенок сразу выбрал хорошие песни, правильное хобби, серьезные цел…
Ревность принято осуждать.
Но что, если это не враг, а сигнал?
Собрала 20 научных фактов о ревности — без мифов, только психология, нейронаука и исследования.
Читайте 👆🏻
И обязательно напишите в комментариях:
какой факт удивил вас больше всего?
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @iqsclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Екатерина Шрейнер | SchreinerKate | Психолог @schreinerkate_life · 65,333 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
Елена Лаштабега @elena_lashtabega · 22,838 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“За чашкой чая о важном простыми словами” (@iqsclub), 1,085 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iqsclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
