Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for پرومن | مرجع لایحه تاخیرات و کنترل پروژه

Channel

پرومن | مرجع لایحه تاخیرات و کنترل پروژه

@iproman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

628subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001420780688
TypeChannel
Username@iproman
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iproman

Growth

627628627.511 Aug 2026, 21:17 — 627 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:30 — 627 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 01:52 — 628 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:1712 Aug 2026, 01:52
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 627–628 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:52628+1
11 Aug 2026, 21:30627no change
11 Aug 2026, 21:17627first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.9%
avg views ÷ 628 subscribers
Avg views / post
182
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total3,449
Reactions total74
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5876.3%
810.5%
🙏79.21%
🔥22.63%
👏11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC57 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🔴 مشکل پروژه همیشه تأخیر نیست؛ گاهی شما دیر متوجه تأخیر می‌شوید. فرض کنید پروژه شما امروز ۸٪ از برنامه عقب است. اما مدیر پروژه این موضوع را زمانی متوجه می‌شود که: ▪️ گزارش ماهانه آماده شده ▪️ صورت‌وضعیت ارسال شده ▪️ هزینه‌ها از بودجه عبور کرده‌اند ▪️ منابع جابه‌جا شده‌اند ▪️ و بخشی از فرصت‌های جبران از دست رفته است. اینجاست که تفاوت بین «گزارش‌دهی» و «کنترل پروژه» مشخص می‌شود. گزارش‌دهی به شما می‌گوید چه اتفاقی افتاد

👍32👏1

Signed Amin Khazaeli

11 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC88 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍7

Signed Amin Khazaeli

11 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC89 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍6🔥1

Signed Amin Khazaeli

11 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC90 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

سلام و وقت بخیر 📂 پرومن را بهتر بشناسید پروژه موفق، فقط با اجرای خوب ساخته نمی‌شود؛ با اطلاعات دقیق، کنترل مستمر و تصمیم‌گیری درست مدیریت می‌شود. در گروه مهندسی پرومن در کنار شرکت‌های پیمانکاری و سازندگان هستیم تا در حوزه‌های: 🔹 برنامه‌ریزی و کنترل پروژه 🔹 کنترل هزینه و جریان نقدینگی 🔹 تحلیل تأخیرات و ادعا 🔹 مدیریت پیشرفت و عملکرد پروژه 🔹 استقرار سیستم‌های مدیریت پروژه پروژه‌ها را دقیق‌تر، شفاف‌تر و قابل‌کنترل‌تر پی

👍7🙏1

Signed Amin Khazaeli

8 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC188 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

در پروژه‌های شما، کدهای هزینه مالی به WBS پروژه متصل هستند؟

  1. بله، کاملاً یکپارچه است21%
  2. تا حدی ارتباط دارند10%
  3. واحد مالی و کنترل پروژه کاملاً جدا هستند41%
  4. چنین ساختاری نداریم28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🙏3

Signed Amin Khazaeli

8 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC201 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔗 راهکار: یکپارچه‌سازی WBS و CBS در یک سیستم کنترل پروژه یکپارچه، از ابتدای پروژه ساختار شکست کار (WBS) با ساختار شکست هزینه (CBS) و سرفصل‌های مالی متناظر می‌شود. یعنی ساختار پروژه تا سطوح مشخصی شکسته می‌شود و برای هر بخش، کد مالی متناظر تعریف می‌شود. در نتیجه: WBS پروژه ⬇️ Cost Code / CBS ⬇️ ثبت هزینه واقعی و حالا هر ریالی که در پروژه هزینه می‌شود، می‌توان مشخص کرد: مربوط به کدام بخش پروژه است؟ مربوط به کدام فعالیت

👍4

Signed Amin Khazaeli

8 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC163 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

📊 وقتی مدیر پروژه می‌گوید «ضرر کرده‌ایم» و مدیر مالی می‌گوید «هنوز سودده هستیم»؛ کدام درست می‌گوید؟ یکی از مشکلات رایج در پروژه‌های پیمانکاری، نبود زبان مشترک بین کنترل پروژه و واحد مالی است. کنترل پروژه معمولاً پروژه را با WBS می‌بیند: فعالیت → بسته کاری → فاز → پروژه اما واحد مالی پروژه را از زاویه‌ی دیگری می‌بیند: کد هزینه → سرفصل حسابداری → مرکز هزینه → پروژه نتیجه چیست؟ ممکن است کنترل پروژه اعلام کند: 🔴 پروژه از

👍3🙏1

Signed Amin Khazaeli

7 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC160 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🌐 مقالات تخصصی مدیریت پروژه: proman.ir 📸 آموزش‌ها و ریلزهای تخصصی: https://www.instagram.com/proman.ir #ActionPlan #کنترل_پروژه #مدیریت_پروژه #برنامه_ریزی #ProjectControl #ProMan

👍3

Signed Amin Khazaeli

7 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC160 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

در پروژه شما، تعهدات هفتگی چگونه ثبت و پیگیری می‌شوند؟

  1. صورتجلسات21%
  2. اکسل37%
  3. واتس اپ/تلگرام21%
  4. نرم‌افزارهای کنترل پروژه5%
  5. سیستم مشخصی نداریم37%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍3

Signed Amin Khazaeli

7 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC151 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎯 فلسفه Action Plan در یک جمله: برنامه زمان‌بندی مشخص می‌کند پروژه باید کجا باشد؛ Action Plan مشخص می‌کند این هفته چه کسی باید چه کاری انجام دهد تا پروژه به آن نقطه برسد. در گروه مهندسی پرومن، Action Plan هفتگی را به‌عنوان یکی از ابزارهای تبدیل برنامه زمان‌بندی به تعهدات اجرایی قابل اندازه‌گیری طراحی و استفاده کرده‌ایم. 📎 در ادامه، نمونه فرم اختصاصی Action Plan پرومن را در اختیار شما قرار می‌دهیم تا بتوانید از آن در

👍3🔥1

Signed Amin Khazaeli

7 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC147 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔍 تفاوت Action Plan با برنامه زمان‌بندی چیست؟ فرض کنید در برنامه زمان‌بندی نوشته شده: اجرای دیوارچینی طبقه سوم این برای کنترل سطح کلان پروژه کافی نیست. در Action Plan این فعالیت می‌تواند به تعهدات مشخص‌تری تبدیل شود: 🔸 تکمیل دیوارچینی واحدهای ۳۰۱ تا ۳۰۴ 🔸 تأمین بلوک موردنیاز 🔸 تعیین اکیپ اجرایی 🔸 تکمیل عملیات تا پایان هفته 🔸 مسئول: پیمانکار سفت‌کاری حالا در پایان هفته دیگر سؤال این نیست که: «چرا پروژه پیشرفت نکرد؟» ب

👍2

Signed Amin Khazaeli

7 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC136 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

اکشن پلن چگونه استخراج می‌شود؟ در ابتدای هر هفته، بخشی از فعالیت‌های برنامه زمان‌بندی که باید در آن هفته اجرا شوند، بررسی و به اقدامات مشخص و قابل پیگیری تبدیل می‌شوند. برای هر اقدام، مواردی مانند: ▪️ شرح اقدام ▪️ مسئول انجام ▪️ مهلت انجام ▪️ خروجی مورد انتظار ▪️ وضعیت اقدام ▪️ توضیحات و موانع مشخص می‌شود. در نتیجه، تعهدات هفتگی از حالت کلی و شفاهی خارج شده و به تعهداتی شفاف، قابل اندازه‌گیری و قابل پیگیری تبدیل می‌ش

👍2

Signed Amin Khazaeli

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iproman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

در پروژه‌های شما، کدهای هزینه مالی به WBS پروژه متصل هستند؟

  1. بله، کاملاً یکپارچه است21%
  2. تا حدی ارتباط دارند10%
  3. واحد مالی و کنترل پروژه کاملاً جدا هستند41%
  4. چنین ساختاری نداریم28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

در پروژه شما، تعهدات هفتگی چگونه ثبت و پیگیری می‌شوند؟

  1. صورتجلسات21%
  2. اکسل37%
  3. واتس اپ/تلگرام21%
  4. نرم‌افزارهای کنترل پروژه5%
  5. سیستم مشخصی نداریم37%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 849,333 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پرومن | مرجع لایحه تاخیرات و کنترل پروژه” (@iproman), 628 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iproman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.