Channel
@ipoteka_ufimtseva
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,159subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001691992917 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ipoteka_ufimtseva |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ipoteka_ufimtseva |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 1,159 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 1,160 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 1,161 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 1,161 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 600 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😳 Они думали, что сэкономили. На самом деле потеряли миллионы. На днях консультировала клиентов, которые, к сожалению, пришли ко мне уже после того, как приняли финансовое решение. Они хотели взять деньги под залог своей недвижимости на личные цели. Самостоятельно нашли банк. Самостоятельно получили одобрение. Самостоятельно оформили кредит. И были очень довольны собой. «Зачем кому-то платить, если мы сами всё смог…
Нужна персональная консультация - пиши сюда
Завтра покажу планировки и расчеты, если интересно 🙌🏻
Сегодня была встреча с банками и застройщиками. Каждый раз еду туда не за красивыми презентациями. Моя задача — найти 💎возможности, которые действительно помогут моим клиентам купить недвижимость на лучших условиях. Сегодня как раз нашла одно такое предложение для семей, которые ещё подходят под семейную ипотеку. Записала короткий обзор 👇
Вчера ездили смотреть дома с клиентами. И знаете, какой вывод оказался самым ценным? Не то, что дом понравился или не понравился. А то, что после просмотра запрос стал намного точнее. До поездки казалось, что вариантов много. После поездки стало понятно, что действительно важно: ✔ три отдельные спальни; ✔ готовый ремонт; ✔ комфортный бюджет; ✔ возможность купить без первоначального взноса. Сегодня весь день заним…
🏡 Дом 90 м² на участке 6,2 сотки Три спальни + большая кухня-гостиная, предчистовая отделка White Box, тёплые полы по всему дому. Коммуникации уже подведены: газ, вода, электричество, биостанция. Сам посёлок уже обжитой: закрытая территория, асфальтированные дороги, охрана, детские площадки. То есть это не история «построили дом посреди поля, а дальше когда-нибудь всё появится». Стоимость — 13,2 млн ₽. По текущему п…
А если готовый дом не хочется или его нет 😅 и хочется построить именно свой?🌲 Тогда следующий вопрос — где? И здесь вариантов на самом деле гораздо больше, чем кажется. Можно выбрать участок самостоятельно. Можно строиться на участке, который у вас уже есть. А можно взять участок непосредственно у застройщика — уже в готовом коттеджном посёлке с понятными документами и инфраструктурой. И вот на один такой вариант …
Планировка
Почти готовый дом - для тех, кто не хочет ждать ⏰ Дом в Щёлковском районе, 90 м² + участок 6,2 сотки. И планировка, на мой взгляд, очень семейная: три отдельные спальни и большая кухня-гостиная почти 30 м². Дом из тёплой керамики, передаётся в White Box: уже разведены электрика, вода, канализация и отопление, по всему дому водяные тёплые полы. Сам посёлок уже обжитой: закрытая территория, КПП, видеонаблюдение, асф…
❤1
Доброе утро из дома, который ещё недавно был просто проектом 🏡 Вчера показывала, как он рос: участок → фундамент → стены → крыша → и вот мы уже здесь живём. А сегодня хочу перейти от моей истории к более практичной части. Что сейчас можно купить, если тоже хочется свой дом? Покажу два сценария: практически готовый вариант — для тех, кто не хочет ждать, и участки, где можно построить дом уже под себя. Причём один г…
Я строила дом на лайте 😄 И нет, не потому что строительство дома — это легко. Когда я решила строить, я уже примерно понимала, как хочу пройти этот путь: без жизни на стройке, без попыток самой стать прорабом и без ежедневного контроля, правильно ли там положили очередной кирпич. Я хотела выбрать проект — и дальше наблюдать, как он постепенно становится нашим домом. Так и получилось. Приехала — фундамент. В следу…
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ipoteka_ufimtseva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,300,733 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анастасия Уфимцева про недвижку и кредитование 🔥” (@ipoteka_ufimtseva), 1,159 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ipoteka_ufimtseva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.