Channel
@iplcnews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,252subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001218343441 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iplcnews |
| Description | 公司成立于2016年，距离百年老店还有90年！ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iplcnews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 2,252 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 2,252 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 March 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,950 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
CloudIPLC - 沪日 IPLC-NAT 秒杀款，限时返场！🔥 📅 返场时间：8/3 - 8/5（三天） ⚙️ 配置：1vCPU / 512M / 5G-SSD / 50M 峰值带宽 ⚠️ 注意：下单后流量计划不支持变更，续费同价 💰 流量&价格： - 200G 方案：779/半年，1299/整年 - 500G 方案：2159/半年，3599/整年 - 1000G 方案：4559/半年，7599/整年 🔥 抢购链接： https://www.cloudiplc.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=125 🌍 线路优势： - 上海一线优质 BGP 多线，低延时。 - 两端公网 IP 采用真内网，端内延迟低至 26ms。🚀
流量自助重置 已更新为 流量重置券 现在趁7折优惠可先屯着。需要时再使用！只要VPS不过期流量重置券就不过期！ 注意！流量重置券绑定当前VPS。仅限IPLC TY-NAT Rev2-(1~4)主机系列可购！
VPS面板已焕新升级，希望大家喜欢~ 不要忘记，我们的NAT-VPS流量重置7折优惠还在进行中！极具性价比！
【好消息！】 该活动延期至8/31，以作为暑期档特别优惠限时提供。9/1正式恢复原价 【优惠购！】 优惠码：DB9OVA2FRW（9折优惠至7/20） 立即下单！适用于IPLC TY-NAT Rev2系列 https://www.cloudiplc.com/cart.php?gid=14 正在苦苦寻求一台高质量+长期稳定无烦恼的专线VPS？ 我们是最棒的选择！目前流量优惠价是入手的最佳时机！
🎯CloudIPLC 沪日 IPLC-NAT 流量自助重置限时活动 即日起，IPLC TY-NAT Rev2 系列用户可自助重置流量享 7 折 🎉 📋活动详情 适用产品：Rev2-1 至 Rev2-4 标准套餐 优惠力度： 7 折大促💰 优惠限时：即日起至7月20日 入口：VPS 面板 → 流量下方 → 【自助重置流量】 示例：Rev2-1 重置 100GB 仅需 49 元 ⚠️ 注意 - 不叠加剩余流量，不延长有效期 - 仅限标准 Rev2-1 至 Rev2-4，不含周年/限量/特殊款
↑ 以上2个活动今天最后一天，可叠加使用。优惠力度ProMax 拥有CloudIPLC沪日NAT-VPS，是通往国际入口的省心最优解
🎉 CloudIPLC-跨月存费增费活动开始！ 🎈活动时间：6/30-7/1，限时2天！ 1️⃣ 账户充值 499元余额，到手600元！ 2️⃣ 账户充值 999元余额，到手1200元！ 3️⃣ 账户充值1999元余额，到手2450元！ * 活动3选1仅赠1次，赠款为隔日自动到账 ⭐️活动细则： 1：一个账户仅限参与1次，多次充值无效 2：仅对账户余额充值为499/999/1999元整有效 3：赠款统一隔日添加至账户余额, 无需单独申请 4：账户余额不可退款/转移! 仅限新购/续费产品！
🎉 CloudIPLC 沪日IPLC-NAT 6月捡漏促销 活动时间：即日起至 2026年7月1日 (3天) 🔗 购买链接 👉 https://www.cloudiplc.com/cart.php?gid=14 - 优惠力度：9折优惠 💰 - 优惠码：G39PYK8VQ0 - 使用方式：下单时输入优惠码 产品优势： 端内延迟低至26ms.并配有多条低延迟备缆保证 入口BGP，不挑运营商。出境丝滑，无惧晚高峰 可自定义NAT端口，无需复杂配置单台主机搞定 * 由于大陆政策，该主机仅限内地用户购买使用
活动最后一天！需要的老板请抓紧时机。上次错过抱怨的这次莫在错过，后面应该没有大节销售此款了
CloudIPLC - 沪日 IPLC-NAT 秒杀款，618 限时返场！🔥 📅 返场时间：6/17-6/19（端午节期间） ⚙️ 配置：1vCPU / 512M / 5G-SSD / 50M 峰值带宽 ⚠️ 注意：下单后流量计划不支持变更，续费同价 💰 流量&价格： - 200G 方案：779/半年，1299/整年 - 500G 方案：2159/半年，3599/整年 - 1000G 方案：4559/半年，7599/整年 🔥 抢购链接： https://www.cloudiplc.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=125 🌍 线路优势： - 上海一线优质 BGP 多线，低延时。 - 两端公网 IP 采用真内网，端内延迟低至 26ms。🚀
关于沪日IPLC-NAT调整通知： 1） 根据运营商通告，我们现已封堵通过大陆IP访问的网站端口 * 特别是各种基于Web管理的各类违法XX面板，过于敏感被扫 2） 同时我们也已变更了cname地址，请通过NAT面板查询更新
【CloudIPLC】沪日IPLC-NAT秒杀款，限时返场！ 返场时间：5/23-5/25 【数量有限,售完为止】 配置：1vCPU/512M/5G-SSD/50M峰值带宽 注意, 下单后流量计划不支持变更，续费同价 流量&价格： 200G方案：779/半年，1299/整年 500G方案：2159/半年，3599/整年 1000G方案：4559/半年，7599/整年 🔥 抢购链接： https://www.cloudiplc.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=125 🌍 线路优势： 入口采用一线上海优质BGP多线确保不同运营商最低延时 两端公网IP间采用市面稀有的真内网，端内延迟低至26ms
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iplcnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 413,349 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CloudIPLC 公告” (@iplcnews), 2,252 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iplcnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.