2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 10:13
31
no change
14 Aug 2026, 17:17
31
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.2%
avg views ÷ 31 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.6
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
76.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
9 (7 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
140
Reactions total
95
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
95 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
37
38.9%
❤
36
37.9%
🔥
22
23.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💸 Неделя, когда архивы оказались интереснее новых идей:
С 8 по 14 августа бренды массово обратились к прошлому. Выбрали 4 главных релиза недели:
1. 👔 Air Jordan 6 “Black and White” — €209.99
Чемпионский силуэт Майкла Джордана из 1991-го. Классическая форма, кожа и нубук. Самый статусный релиз подборки.
2. 👕 Nike Rift 2 “Black and Metallic Silver” — €129.99
Переосмысление модели 2002 года: сетка, гибкая конструкция…
🚚 Откуда можем привезти?
Практически отовсюду.
Мы не привязаны к определённым магазинам — если нужная вам вещь продаётся в Европе, мы постараемся её найти и привезти.
Чтобы было понятнее, вот лишь несколько площадок, с которыми можно работать:
🧛Мультибренды и люкс:
— END.
— SSENSE
— Farfetch
— Mr Porter
— Mytheresa
— LN-CC
— Antonioli
— Voo Store
— LuisaViaRoma
🧛Бренды и массмаркет:
— Nike
— Adidas
— Salomon
—…
💸 #ДелоИосифа
ДЕЛО №001 — SALOMON XT‑6 👕
Предмет дела: оправданы ли €180 за XT‑6 — или сегодня мы в основном платим за статус городской иконы?
Что установлено:
В 2013 году XT‑6 создавали для 100-мильных ультратрейлов. В 2018-м Salomon вернул модель уже в линейке Sportstyle — и постепенно она перебралась с трасс на городские улицы.
На стороне защиты:
Технический вид здесь не декорация. SensiFit фиксирует стопу, …
💸5 КУРТОК НА РАННЮЮ ОСЕНЬ
Пока для тяжёлой верхней одежды ещё рано, нужен нормальный слой на прохладный вечер. Выбрали пять моделей с разным характером — от простого денима до классической Baracuta G9.
1. ARKET Drizzler Cotton Jacket — €64,50 вместо €129
Спокойная хлопковая куртка, которую легко носить с футболкой, поло или тонким трикотажем. На карточке сейчас размеры XS–XL.
2. Levi’s Jackson Worker Overshirt — …
💸 #ИосифСобирает
⚽️FOOTBALL CASUAL
Не форма и не шарф — городской образ с футбольным характером.
Футбольный casual работает тогда, когда его не собирают буквально. Поэтому здесь нет клубных цветов и спортивного костюма: только вещи, которые сами по себе выглядят спокойно, но вместе сразу задают нужное настроение.
👕 Fred Perry — классическое поло, которое задаёт чистую базу
🧥 Stone Island — тёмная оверсёртка для …
💸 ОТКРЫВАЕМ «ДЕЛО ИОСИФА»
Есть вещь, которую хочется купить, но непонятно, стоит ли она своих денег?
Или другая задача: найти куртку на осень, подобрать обувь к конкретному образу, уложиться в определённый бюджет.
Присылайте нам:
— ссылку или фотографию вещи;
— свой размер;
— задачу и бюджет;
— что именно вызывает сомнение.
Мы проверим актуальную цену в Европе, состав, доступные размеры и возможные альтернативы.…
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👔 #ИсторияБренда 👔
Stone Island: бренд, который начался с ткани
В 1982 году Massimo Osti получил необычный материал — плотную военную ткань Tela Stella. Из неё он сделал первую коллекцию Stone Island.
Название взяли из морских романов Джозефа Конрада, а компас на рукаве появился как символ движения и исследования. Дальше началось самое интересное.
Stone Island экспериментировал с материалами, которые тогда практи…
💸 Дропы и новинки недели👟
За последние дни появилось сразу четыре релиза, которые действительно стоит посмотреть. Все названия кликабельны — по ссылкам открываются официальные материалы брендов.👇
•Kith × Salomon XT‑EVO
Kith и Salomon представили новый силуэт: верх из жидкой резины и дышащей сетки соединили с проверенной платформой XT‑6.
Получилось узнаваемо, но без ощущения, что нам снова продают ту же модель в дру…
❤6❤🔥4🔥3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @iosifsshmot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,256,776 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shmotki by Iosif” (@iosifsshmot), 31 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iosifsshmot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.