Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

io.net official announcements πŸ“£

@ionet_official

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

2,188subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001429949302
TypeChannel
Username@ionet_official
Created20 September 2022 β€” measured β€” dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ionet_official

Growth

2,1882,1922,1907 August 2026 β€” 2,192 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 2,192 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 2,189 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 2,188 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,187–2,193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:442,188-1
10 Aug 2026, 15:132,189-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:332,192no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:312,192first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 20 September 2022 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

358 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘22262.0%
❀8423.5%
πŸ”₯5014.0%
πŸ–•10.279%
😁10.279%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 358reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2022 to 8 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Dec 2023, 13:43 UTCβ‰ˆ14,300 views232 reactionsread 7 August 2026

πŸ“’ Hello @everyone, We'd like to inform you about some ongoing updates affecting certain features on our platform. Currently, you may experience loading loops or issues in the following areas: Worker Page Device Services Negative Uptime Indicators Our team is actively working on these updates. We appreciate your patience and understanding during this process. Rest assured, we are making every effort to resolve the…

πŸ‘164❀47πŸ”₯20πŸ–•1

4 Dec 2023, 20:56 UTCβ‰ˆ13,500 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

πŸ“’ Database Update in Progress Hello everyone, We're currently updating our database, so don't be alarmed if you see your balance temporarily showing as 0. This is a crucial update to enable rewards withdrawals. Your rewards and earnings are completely secure (SAFU). I'll keep you posted and let you know as soon as the update is complete. Thanks for your patience! πŸš€ Stay tuned for more updates!

πŸ‘35❀5

26 Nov 2023, 15:47 UTCβ‰ˆ10,300 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

πŸš€βœ¨ Exciting News, IO nation! Our Cloud platform just got a major upgrade! πŸŒπŸ’» πŸ”₯ What's Hot: 🎨 Sleeker Look: A fresh coat of pixels for a slicker vibe. ++++ DARK THEME πŸš€ Smooth Navigation: Your go-to features, now just a click away. ⚑ Next-Level Infrastructure 🌐 Explore Now: https://cloud.io.net/ πŸ‘€ Ready to redefine your cloud experience? Dive into the future with io.net Your feedback fuels our innovation. πŸ’¬βœ¨ πŸ”₯ Sta…

❀21πŸ‘6😁1

22 Nov 2023, 18:08 UTCβ‰ˆ7,190 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

You may have been wondering why there are differing utilization rates for IO, Render, and Filecoin supplier categories. This is because the IO Team has been conducting internal tests on the nodes across the platform in rotation: IO: Internal tests are ~90% completed. Filecoin: Booked by a single client. Render: Coming soon – In the next several weeks, the IO Team will be conducting tests with Render nodes. We’re gr…

πŸ”₯18❀5πŸ‘1

20 Nov 2023, 10:03 UTCβ‰ˆ6,070 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We have just listed back Laptop GPUs of the following models: GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

πŸ”₯12πŸ‘11❀6

20 Nov 2023, 08:08 UTCβ‰ˆ5,730 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

@everyone, we’re doing some network upgrades for the new supported hardware. If you don’t see your device listed on io.net network, this is due to the upgrades. Please be on the lookout for the announcement after the network upgrades are finished. Everything should be back to normal soon. Thank you for your patience and understanding πŸš€

πŸ‘5

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @ionet_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 1,150,203 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œio.net official announcements πŸ“£β€ (@ionet_official), 2,188 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ionet_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.