Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психометрия | AmirNet | Яэль

Channel

Психометрия | AmirNet | Яэль

@iok800

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

583subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001320493779
TypeChannel
Username@iok800
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iok800

Growth

578583580.57 August 2026 — 578 subscribers8 August 2026 — 578 subscribers16 August 2026 — 580 subscribers22 August 2026 — 583 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 577–584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 16:44583+3
16 Aug 2026, 07:57580+2
8 Aug 2026, 03:21578no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:26578first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.4%
avg views ÷ 583 subscribers
Avg views / post
241
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total724
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1437.8%
👌513.5%
😱410.8%
🔥38.11%
🌚25.41%
🌭25.41%
😐25.41%
😨25.41%
👍12.70%
💔12.70%
🥱12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC333 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не знаешь, какую специальность выбрать? Мы подготовили подробный промпт, который поможет разобраться в своих интересах, сильных сторонах и понять, какие направления стоит рассмотреть. Переходи к рилсу и напиши в комментариях «Хочу». Отправим промпт в личные сообщения 👇 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbgXDQZNimG

30 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC177 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Оценки за летнюю психометрию уже пришли! Волнуемся вместе с вами и держим кулачки, чтобы результат порадовал ❤️

💔1

28 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC214 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Какой результат вы ждете? 👌 выше 700 ❤️ выше 600 ✅ выше 500

5👌5🌚2😐2

23 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC298 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня немного похвастаемся 😊 Мы опубликовали отзывы студентов после весеннего летнего курса психометрии 2026. Хотели выбрать несколько лучших цитат для поста, но не смогли. Там и «мегахорош», и «преподаватель 12/10», и очень личные слова о поддержке, уверенности, понятных объяснениях и атмосфере на занятиях. И самое приятное, что всё это пишут о разных преподавателях. Значит, у нас действительно получилась коман

1

17 Jul 2026, 13:17 UTC455 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩺 Учитесь на врача за границей и хотите продолжить обучение в Израиле? В Бар-Илане есть трехлетняя программа, участники которой после прохождения отбора и завершения третьего курса за рубежом могут начать учёбу в Израиле с 4-го курса. Но есть условие, о котором легко узнать слишком поздно: ❗️ Кандидатуру можно подать только в конце второго курса. ❗️ Подать её можно только один раз. Среди основных требований: полн

1🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 11:49 UTC257 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мы обновили список книг для подготовки к письменному заданию на психометрии. Зачем вообще читать книги перед эссе? Не для того, чтобы “писать красиво”. На психометрии важно другое: — ясно сформулировать позицию; — построить аргумент; — привести пример; — связать абзацы; — сделать понятный вывод. Мы много лет проверяем письменные задания и видим одну частую проблему: ученик понимает тему, но текст получается расплы

4

12 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC228 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера в сторис спросили: что чаще всего мешает на тесте? Самые частые ответы: время и “всё вместе”. И это очень похоже на реальную психометрию. На экзамене мало просто знать тему. Нужно успевать, читать внимательно, выбирать стратегию и держать темп. Поэтому подготовка к психометрии - это не только уроки. Это ещё и симуляции, разбор ошибок, эссе, самостоятельная работа, умное расписание и понятный маршрут до экз

7 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC262 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как эта же задача выглядела в настоящем экзамене на иврите: לתחח : זרע (1) לסתת : בנה (2) לזגג : אפה (3) להשקות : פרח (4) לתכנן : גנז

🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC260 viewsread 8 August 2026

Решение: Решение: Анализ пары: Разрыхлять — это подготовительное действие, которое необходимо выполнить с почвой, чтобы затем совершить действие сеял. Это связь «подготовка среды — основное действие». Анализ вариантов: (1) Обтесывать : строил. Обтесывание (камня или дерева) — это подготовительное действие, необходимое для того, чтобы затем совершить процесс строительства. Связь совпадает с исходной. (2) «Глазировать

7 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC237 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Аналогия из психометрии разрыхлять : сеял

  1. (1) обтесывать : строил50%
  2. (2) глазировать : пек9%
  3. (3) поливать : цвел37%
  4. (4) планировать : архивировать4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC234 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

לא דובים ולא יער : לאשר (1) "לא, תודה" : להציע (2) "לא נורא" : לנחם (3) "בוז" : לשבח (4) "ניחא" : להסכים Откуда в иврите появилось выражение «Ни медведей, ни леса»? Это интересная история. Выражение восходит к библейскому сюжету из Второй книги Царств (4 Царств 2:23-24). Пророк Елисей шел по дороге, и насмехавшиеся над ним дети кричали: «Иди, плешивый!». В ответ на это Елисей проклял их, и из леса вышли две медв

1🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC183 viewsread 8 August 2026

Хотите посмотреть, как эта задача выглядела в настоящем экзамене на иврите?

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iok800. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz54 voters

Аналогия из психометрии разрыхлять : сеял

  1. (1) обтесывать : строил50%
  2. (2) глазировать : пек9%
  3. (3) поливать : цвел37%
  4. (4) планировать : архивировать4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz72 voters

Аналогия из психометрии «И близко ничего нет» : подтвердить

  1. (1) «Нет, спасибо» : предлагать21%
  2. (2) «Не страшно» : утешать19%
  3. (3) «Позор» : хвалить43%
  4. (4) «Ладно» : соглашаться17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психометрия | AmirNet | Яэль” (@iok800), 583 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iok800.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.