Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Invisible Man

Channel

Invisible Man

@invisiblemanvpn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,830subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001743384159
TypeChannel
Username@invisiblemanvpn
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/invisiblemanvpn

Growth

3,8303,8823,8566 August 2026 — 3,882 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,882 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,876 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,870 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,874 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,873 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,863 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,850 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,847 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,843 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,839 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,830 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 32 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,822–3,890 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 07:203,830-9
2 Sept 2026, 21:533,839-4
31 Aug 2026, 02:173,843-4
27 Aug 2026, 23:573,847-3
24 Aug 2026, 20:393,850-13
20 Aug 2026, 22:073,863-10
17 Aug 2026, 17:563,873-1
14 Aug 2026, 20:063,874+4
11 Aug 2026, 13:413,870-6
8 Aug 2026, 23:513,876-6
6 Aug 2026, 04:213,882no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:193,882first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

884 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28231.9%
🔥24527.7%
👍22325.2%
👏313.51%
🎉192.15%
🍾141.58%
🎄141.58%
❤‍🔥121.36%
🫡80.905%
🤯60.679%
🏆50.566%
👎50.566%
😭40.452%
😁30.339%
🥰30.339%
👌20.226%
😍20.226%
🤗20.226%
10.113%
🆒10.113%
2 further kinds20.226%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 884 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2024 to 25 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
585
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 19 we hold a reading for · 79%
Most on one post
240
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @invisiblemanvpn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 September 2024 to 25 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jun 2025, 13:19 UTC≈23,000 views93 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

I saw your PRs. Thank you all for your contribution to making the app better. I'm too busy these days, but will check and merge them soon 🍻

54👍22🔥11😭4🤯1😍1

19 May 2025, 08:35 UTC≈24,600 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

There are some issues that were tagged as "good first issue" They should be a good start for contributing to Invisible Man XRay and improving it. If you know how to code, your contribution is welcome! 🍻 https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/issues

20🔥3😁3👌2

9 May 2025, 14:04 UTC≈19,300 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thanks to zgcwkj for contributing to the app to add Chinese language and improvements. As always, I ask any of you who knows Chinese to check the translations in this link: PR: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/pull/187 Thank you for your contribution! 🍻

17🔥5👍3

13 Feb 2025, 06:43 UTC≈18,700 views79 reactions20 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We reached to 200K total downloads Good, but as I said previously, I hope we don't need such as these apps to access free internet.

52🔥15🍾12

10 Feb 2025, 07:09 UTC≈16,700 views45 reactions41 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

And, 500 stars ⭐️ https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient

👏27🎉8👍6🔥4

3 Feb 2025, 10:28 UTC≈14,100 views36 reactions70 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Fam, you've added some great new features and bug fixes in this version! It feels amazing to see others contributing to something I originally started alone. Every contribution is appreciated, keep it up!

🔥22👍95

2 Feb 2025, 14:25 UTC≈11,500 views50 reactions240 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Invisible Man XRay v3.2.5 is now available! Download links: - x64: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/releases/download/v3.2.5/InvisibleManXRay-x64.zip - x86: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/releases/download/v3.2.5/InvisibleManXRay-x86.zip Changelog: - Upgraded the xray core to v25.1.30 - Add a feature to allow the app to connect automatically on-startup - Add a f

32🔥8❤‍🔥5👍3👎1😍1

29 Jan 2025, 13:08 UTC≈8,830 views26 reactions15 Starsread 8 August 2026

Haha! Love this video tutorial for using Invisible Man XRay https://youtu.be/52zGdLxzs1o

👍13🔥11👎2

19 Jan 2025, 08:31 UTC≈8,490 views24 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026

Many thanks to Lavshyak for contributing to fix another problem in the app: If the main window was behind others or was already open on another virtual desktop, then when you tried to open it through the tray, nothing was happened (issue-165) PR: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/pull/169

19👍2🔥2🍾1

4 Jan 2025, 11:30 UTC≈8,700 views38 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026

Huge thanks to Lurker00 for contributing to add two essential features that many people request: - Start hidden at startup (issue-121) - Auto-Connect at startup (issue-122) These features will be available in the next release. PR: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/pull/167

🔥19👍108👀1

31 Dec 2024, 20:46 UTC≈8,390 views91 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Happy new year, fam! 🍻🎄🎉

56🎄14🎉10👍7🥰3👎1

26 Dec 2024, 13:46 UTC≈8,740 views59 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

Many people reported when they shutdown/restart their computer while Invisible Man XRay is running, after reloading Windows, their internet connection breaks because the app can't disable proxy settings correctly. Today, I fixed it, and we shouldn't face this problem in the next release. PR: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/pull/162

🔥32👍1871❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @invisiblemanvpn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Nov 2024, 10:33 UTCFinal Results186 voters

Now, Invisible Man XRay has reached about 10K daily active users. I was thinking about providing a marketplace or something like that to connect users to the server providers. Don't know if that's a good idea or not. So you tell me if you agree with that.

  1. Yes72%
  2. No28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2024 to 25 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Invisible Man” (@invisiblemanvpn), 3,830 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/invisiblemanvpn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.