I saw your PRs. Thank you all for your contribution to making the app better. I'm too busy these days, but will check and merge them soon 🍻
❤54👍22🔥11😭4🤯1😍1

Channel
@invisiblemanvpn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,830subscribers
-52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001743384159 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @invisiblemanvpn |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/invisiblemanvpn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 3,830 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:53 | 3,839 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 3,843 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 3,847 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:39 | 3,850 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 3,863 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 3,873 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 3,874 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 3,870 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 3,876 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 3,882 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 3,882 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
884 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 282 | 31.9% | |
| 🔥 | 245 | 27.7% | |
| 👍 | 223 | 25.2% | |
| 👏 | 31 | 3.51% | |
| 🎉 | 19 | 2.15% | |
| 🍾 | 14 | 1.58% | |
| 🎄 | 14 | 1.58% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 1.36% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 0.905% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 0.679% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 0.566% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.566% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 0.452% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.339% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.339% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.226% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.226% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.226% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.113% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.113% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.226% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 884 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2024 to 25 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @invisiblemanvpn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 September 2024 to 25 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
I saw your PRs. Thank you all for your contribution to making the app better. I'm too busy these days, but will check and merge them soon 🍻
❤54👍22🔥11😭4🤯1😍1
There are some issues that were tagged as "good first issue" They should be a good start for contributing to Invisible Man XRay and improving it. If you know how to code, your contribution is welcome! 🍻 https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/issues
❤20🔥3😁3👌2
Thanks to zgcwkj for contributing to the app to add Chinese language and improvements. As always, I ask any of you who knows Chinese to check the translations in this link: PR: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/pull/187 Thank you for your contribution! 🍻
❤17🔥5👍3
We reached to 200K total downloads Good, but as I said previously, I hope we don't need such as these apps to access free internet.
❤52🔥15🍾12
And, 500 stars ⭐️ https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient
👏27🎉8👍6🔥4
Fam, you've added some great new features and bug fixes in this version! It feels amazing to see others contributing to something I originally started alone. Every contribution is appreciated, keep it up!
🔥22👍9❤5
Invisible Man XRay v3.2.5 is now available! Download links: - x64: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/releases/download/v3.2.5/InvisibleManXRay-x64.zip - x86: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/releases/download/v3.2.5/InvisibleManXRay-x86.zip Changelog: - Upgraded the xray core to v25.1.30 - Add a feature to allow the app to connect automatically on-startup - Add a f…
❤32🔥8❤🔥5👍3👎1😍1
Haha! Love this video tutorial for using Invisible Man XRay https://youtu.be/52zGdLxzs1o
👍13🔥11👎2
Many thanks to Lavshyak for contributing to fix another problem in the app: If the main window was behind others or was already open on another virtual desktop, then when you tried to open it through the tray, nothing was happened (issue-165) PR: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/pull/169
❤19👍2🔥2🍾1
Huge thanks to Lurker00 for contributing to add two essential features that many people request: - Start hidden at startup (issue-121) - Auto-Connect at startup (issue-122) These features will be available in the next release. PR: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/pull/167
🔥19👍10❤8👀1
Happy new year, fam! 🍻🎄🎉
❤56🎄14🎉10👍7🥰3👎1
Many people reported when they shutdown/restart their computer while Invisible Man XRay is running, after reloading Windows, their internet connection breaks because the app can't disable proxy settings correctly. Today, I fixed it, and we shouldn't face this problem in the next release. PR: https://github.com/InvisibleManVPN/InvisibleMan-XRayClient/pull/162
🔥32👍18❤7⚡1❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @invisiblemanvpn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Now, Invisible Man XRay has reached about 10K daily active users. I was thinking about providing a marketplace or something like that to connect users to the server providers. Don't know if that's a good idea or not. So you tell me if you agree with that.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2024 to 25 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Invisible Man” (@invisiblemanvpn), 3,830 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/invisiblemanvpn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.