Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RUDI CRYPTO💰

Channel

RUDI CRYPTO💰

@investrudi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,112subscribers

-142 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001469009041
TypeChannel
Username@investrudi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/investrudi

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,1128,2548,1836 August 2026 — 8,254 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,254 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,246 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,235 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,227 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,219 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,213 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,199 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,192 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,186 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,173 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,141 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,129 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,112 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -142. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,091–8,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 01:008,112-17
13 Sept 2026, 10:188,129-12
9 Sept 2026, 13:578,141-32
4 Sept 2026, 04:168,173-13
31 Aug 2026, 20:088,186-6
28 Aug 2026, 19:388,192-7
25 Aug 2026, 17:328,199-14
22 Aug 2026, 11:138,213-6
19 Aug 2026, 06:268,219-8
16 Aug 2026, 08:348,227-8
13 Aug 2026, 06:188,235-11
10 Aug 2026, 06:408,246-8
6 Aug 2026, 23:158,254no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:048,254first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

211 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12257.8%
🔥8037.9%
🤩41.90%
31.42%
💯20.948%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 14 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jan 2026, 01:22 UTC≈2,530 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥41🤩1

9 Dec 2025, 16:51 UTC≈2,800 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

so, i didn't finish… Trump just promised that the new Fed chair will slash rates pronto. but we gotta hold out till May 2026. kinda feels like a long wait for some rate relief, doesn't it? oh, and Fragment's started crediting Telegram stars again. remember when I mentioned they stopped this? well, looks like they're back on track. all these moves make me wonder… is something bigger at play here? or am I just seei

3

9 Dec 2025, 16:51 UTC≈2,270 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🚀 so, let's dive into the future of crypto. Matt Hougan, CEO of Bitwise, just dropped a bomb saying the crypto market could grow 10-20x over the next decade. that's like, insane growth. he's backing it up with a prediction from the SEC's chairman about tokenizing a whopping $68 trillion in real assets. is this a legit forecast, or just some wishful thinking? idk, but it's definitely got people talking. we gotta ask,

9 Dec 2025, 12:30 UTC≈2,000 viewsread 28 August 2026

wait... Fragment just stopped crediting Telegram stars. users can't get their stars anymore 😅 idk, sounds like a major bummer for those into it. guess we'll have to see how this shakes out.

9 Dec 2025, 12:30 UTC≈1,930 viewsread 28 August 2026

damn, US treasury just dropped a massive $25.4T in treasuries... short-term bonds keep the ship afloat, but it's a debt mess fr. kinda seems like the dollar's got one way to go—down. good news for stocks and crypto in the mid-term 😇 https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1998129185374810539

9 Dec 2025, 08:45 UTC≈1,970 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026

wait... Telegram's testing ads in chats?? some user got hit with one mid-convo, redirected to their official channel. looks like it's only for non-premium users. idk how I feel about this. could change the whole vibe. 🤔 we'll see.

6🔥2🤩1

9 Dec 2025, 08:45 UTC≈1,910 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

bro, this trader just pulled a 340x in a week 🤯. bought 16.3M Franklin for just $716 and flipped 4.8M tokens for $20.5k still holding 11.5M worth $224k. link: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1998204237818494986 some ppl just know how to ride the waves, damn.

7🔥6

8 Dec 2025, 20:30 UTC≈1,780 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

top countries in $BTC ownership 😎 Germany could've been fourth, but they can't HODL 😂 funny how things turn out sometimes, huh?

7🔥2🤩1

8 Dec 2025, 20:30 UTC≈1,650 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

yo, telegram's switching up the game. now you get a heads-up when someone tries to pass you a channel. accept or decline, it's all on you now. no more sneaky scams, fr. gotta say, it's a solid move.

9🔥2

8 Dec 2025, 20:30 UTC≈1,630 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026

alright, so Grayscale's analysts think $TAO is gonna pump. halving's set for dec 14th. circulation's on the rise in subnets too. investor interest is def growing. https://research.grayscale.com/reports/bittensor-on-the-eve-of-the-first-halving let's see how it plays out 🤔

9🔥6

8 Dec 2025, 15:22 UTC≈1,550 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

yo, Ktulhuu's got a 100% win rate on Polymarket. only bets on Strategy stuff? 🤔 and now Strategy just copped 10,624 $BTC. check this out: https://polymarket.com/@Ktulhuu https://x.com/saylor/status/1998015666344054815 maybe he's got the inside scoop or nah? gotta wonder, don't fade the whispers...

9🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @investrudi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

АФОНЯ
@afonya · 36,038
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RUDI CRYPTO💰” (@investrudi), 8,112 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/investrudi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.