6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,483–5,605 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 11:28
5,591
+26
14 Aug 2026, 09:17
5,565
+2
11 Aug 2026, 07:13
5,563
+65
8 Aug 2026, 16:01
5,498
+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:32
5,497
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:29
5,497
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
40.1%
avg views ÷ 5,591 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,240
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.699%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
25 (14 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
40,334
Reactions total
282
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 35s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
482 reactions across 24 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
170
35.3%
😁
159
33.0%
❤
120
24.9%
🔥
24
4.98%
🏆
4
0.83%
💯
2
0.415%
❤🔥
1
0.207%
🦄
1
0.207%
🫡
1
0.207%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 482reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 24 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @investor_true. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Средние у меня сейчас такие 👇
Сбер — 166,75 ₽
Ленэнерго АП — 160,30 ₽
Сургутнефтегаз АП — 40,36 ₽
Роснефть — 417,19 ₽
Новатэк — 1 115,73 ₽
А по поводу усреднения у меня принцип простой. Если позиция в портфеле по-прежнему актуальна и я считаю, что по текущей цене её покупать целесообразно, то докупаю вне зависимости от того, выше цена моей средней или ниже.
Моя задача не в том, чтобы любой ценой снизить среднюю. В…
🙏 Все, кто с небольшими портфелями (от 30.000р до 900.000р) просьба подписаться на отдельный канал. Создали его специально для Вас.
Вход: https://t.me/+OSwtveSKnFg2NzYy
👆Доходность за ИЮНЬ превысила 29,79%. В июле будут ставить новый рекорд. Так может делать каждый.
#promo
К тому, что молодёжь инвестирует, отношусь сугубо положительно. Надо же кому-то рынок откупать 😂
Даже если сейчас у них не так много денег и они только пробуют. Пройдёт время, эти ребята начнут зарабатывать хорошие деньги и понесут их на биржу. Фонда на этом фоне будет только расти.
Но вообще инвестировать надо. Самое важное здесь — не скатываться в откровенную лудоманию. И я не говорю, что свет клином сошёлся толь…
Второй день разрабатываю калькулятор пассивного дохода при помощи вайбкодинга. И я, если честно, в шоке 😄
Что могу сказать: программисты невысокого уровня, похоже, действительно больше не нужны.
Почему я так решил? Потому что раньше я много разрабатывал калькуляторов для сайтов — примерно таких, какой сейчас сделал. У меня были информационные сайты, и под них постоянно требовались подобные штуки. Приходилось работа…
Когда уже можно не работать?
Собрал калькулятор, который считает, через сколько лет вы станете долларовыми или рублевыми миллионерами и сможете уйти в закат. 😂
Решил, так сказать, поближе познакомиться с вайбкодингом — прикольная, конечно, штука. Вложений — 0 рублей и несколько часов времени.
Погоняйте разные цифры, потестируйте. Если найдете баги или захотите какие-нибудь новые фичи — пишите в комментариях. Попро…
Оказывается, я более успешный инвестор. Причем скрывал это... в том числе и от самого себя. 😂
В последнем отчете по портфелю, который я делаю для подписчиков Boosty, у меня получалась доходность около 13%. Но оказалось, что я некорректно учитывал дивиденды. Их нужно было вручную подтверждать (если не загружать брокерский отчет, а я по дивидендам специально этого не делал). В итоге часть дивидендов подтягивалась авто…
Майкл Бьюрри: «Мы близки к крупной вершине и, возможно, упадем, как в 1987 году».
Что он заявил в своем свежем обзоре:
• Мы на пороге масштабного обвала в стиле «черного понедельника» 1987 года.
• Бум вокруг искусственного интеллекта — пузырь, раздутый сомнительными схемами финансирования инфраструктуры.
• Бьюрри продолжает держать шорты против техов и полупроводников: SOXX, Micron, Nvidia, Tesla, Caterpillar, Pala…
Ежемесячный обзор портфеля. Перемудрил с юанями и упустил дно
На Boosty разбираю портфель и рассказываю, как сейчас смотрю на рынок.
Такой разбор публикую каждый месяц. Смотреть тут.
👍8❤2🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @investor_true. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@investor_true edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Настоящий инвестор” (@investor_true), 5,591 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/investor_true.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.