Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 59 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,657–26,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 19:02
26,660
-2
30 Sept 2026, 06:16
26,662
-6
18 Sept 2026, 05:38
26,668
-2
16 Sept 2026, 02:41
26,670
+1
12 Sept 2026, 14:58
26,669
+2
10 Sept 2026, 11:54
26,667
-1
7 Sept 2026, 07:57
26,668
-2
4 Sept 2026, 14:01
26,670
-2
2 Sept 2026, 00:05
26,672
+2
29 Aug 2026, 23:07
26,670
-1
25 Aug 2026, 00:27
26,671
-1
23 Aug 2026, 13:57
26,672
-1
21 Aug 2026, 22:37
26,673
-1
19 Aug 2026, 20:58
26,674
-1
18 Aug 2026, 22:05
26,675
+1
16 Aug 2026, 16:54
26,674
-2
15 Aug 2026, 04:23
26,676
+1
12 Aug 2026, 20:13
26,675
-4
11 Aug 2026, 21:41
26,679
+1
9 Aug 2026, 16:04
26,678
first reading
Engagement
588 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.09%
avg views ÷ 26,660 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,890
243 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
243
of 588 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held
588 (5 August 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total
459,501
Reactions total
8,379
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Oct 2026, 06:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,420
Videos
≈988
Links
≈4,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 31s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 61 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20,974 reactions across 587 posts, in 62 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5,660
27.0%
🎉
1,734
8.27%
👀
1,617
7.71%
🤯
1,334
6.36%
😱
1,303
6.21%
👎
1,300
6.20%
👏
1,231
5.87%
🔥
1,122
5.35%
😢
836
3.99%
🤬
661
3.15%
🐳
548
2.61%
❤
466
2.22%
💯
377
1.80%
🤝
303
1.44%
🤩
302
1.44%
👨💻
185
0.882%
😁
153
0.729%
👌
141
0.672%
😡
135
0.644%
🤡
120
0.572%
42 further kinds
1,446
6.89%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 587 of the 588 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,974 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 588 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👍 The Cardano Foundation is introducing a new token standard that empowers issuers of stablecoins, investment funds, and bonds to determine who is eligible to receive their assets. Additionally, it provides the capability to freeze or confiscate assets in compliance with regulatory requirements. coindesk
🔍🐳 Whale and institutional transactions:
1. The US Government transferred 834 BTC (worth $71.56 million) and 40,285 BNB (valued at $31.63 million). Out of this, 834 BTC ($71.56 million) were deposited into a Coinbase Prime account;
2. Pumpfun disposed of an additional 102,495 SOL (approximately $12.41 million). In total, they have sold 5,347,925 SOL ($861.47 million) at an average price of $161;
3. Bitmine acquired …
📊 #BTC Santiment: Wallets containing between 10 and 10,000 BTC have accumulated an impressive 86,702 BTC over the past three weeks, bringing their total holdings to the highest point since April 23rd. This trend typically indicates a bullish sentiment.
📊 #ADA Santiment: Cardano has experienced a remarkable 42% increase since September 16, prompting significant engagement from major investors. On a single day, the number of ADA transactions exceeding $100,000 hit 413, marking the highest activity level among large players since June 4th.
Additionally, ADA's social dominance reached 1.16%, peaking in 2026. The altcoin's rise from approximately $0.19 to around $0.27 …
📊 #BTC Santiment: Bitcoin experienced its highest net outflow from exchanges in seven months. On Monday, a total of 24,073 BTC was withdrawn from exchanges, marking the largest single-day exit since March 1. Currently, the amount of BTC held on exchanges has fallen to around 6.50% of the total supply.
🤔 #HYPE Hyperliquid has announced to FT that it is now officially registered in Singapore. Additionally, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has stated that it does not view the company's operations as falling within its regulatory scope due to the decentralized nature of its platform.
🥶⚖️ The #USDT Conduit has initiated legal action against Tether, claiming that $2.8 million was frozen without any justification. For more details, check out the article on Cointelegraph.
🙅♂👀 #PENGU The Abstract Chain will be shutting down on December 15th. The reasons given include stagnant growth, low liquidity, a restricted DeFi ecosystem, and a lack of interest from institutional investors.
🗽 #ZEC #ETF The Winklevoss twins have submitted a proposal to the US SEC for the creation of an ETF focused on Zcash.
👍24👏6🎉5🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 588 posts we hold for @investor2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Investors” (@investor2), 26,660 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/investor2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.