Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 50 days, net -135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,791–11,966 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 14:57
11,811
-22
15 Sept 2026, 16:39
11,833
-8
12 Sept 2026, 11:58
11,841
-10
10 Sept 2026, 10:19
11,851
-16
7 Sept 2026, 04:58
11,867
+5
4 Sept 2026, 15:20
11,862
+3
3 Sept 2026, 01:35
11,859
-8
1 Sept 2026, 22:57
11,867
+2
31 Aug 2026, 19:54
11,865
-5
30 Aug 2026, 18:25
11,870
-2
29 Aug 2026, 19:35
11,872
-6
28 Aug 2026, 18:43
11,878
+3
27 Aug 2026, 20:33
11,875
+4
27 Aug 2026, 00:04
11,871
-4
26 Aug 2026, 03:33
11,875
-4
25 Aug 2026, 05:48
11,879
-3
24 Aug 2026, 06:03
11,882
-6
22 Aug 2026, 13:18
11,888
-7
21 Aug 2026, 06:42
11,895
-7
18 Aug 2026, 11:15
11,902
first reading
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 11,811 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,230
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.331%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
84 (1 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
17,258
Reactions total
42
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
317 reactions across 70 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
200
63.1%
👍
60
18.9%
🔥
24
7.57%
⚡
11
3.47%
👏
4
1.26%
🙏
4
1.26%
🆒
3
0.946%
☃
2
0.631%
✍
2
0.631%
🌚
2
0.631%
🤔
2
0.631%
❤🔥
1
0.315%
👎
1
0.315%
😢
1
0.315%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Questo titolo è a -70% dai massimi: occasione di acquisto o trappola? 🎯
Fatturato in crescita, margini in caduta libera, CEO dimissionario e dazi che mordono. 📉 Eppure qualcuno sta comprando: Elliott Management ha messo sul piatto 1,1 miliardi di dollari, BlackRock ha acquistato altri 8,8 milioni di azioni — e anche un insider ha comprato di tasca propria. Il mercato punisce l'incertezza, ma i "big money" sembrano s…
😯Abbiamo costruito una nuova funzione di Forecaster proprio per cercare segnali che normalmente passano inosservati.
🏆E tra pochi giorni la presenteremo per la prima volta.
Non vogliamo anticiparti altro.⚠️
Durante il webinar ti mostreremo cosa abbiamo trovato, come leggerlo e perché potrebbe diventare uno degli strumenti più interessanti di Forecaster.
👉ISCRIVITI ORA ALL’evento del 15 settembre alle 11.00: https://r…
🔴 Oggi, mercoledì 2 settembre, non perderti il consueto Cripto Webinar
Alle ore 17:00 ci sarà il webinar con la panoramica sulle ultime news a tema cripto.
Ecco gli argomenti che tratteremo:
• Tassi Fed a settembre: i rialzi fermeranno la corsa di Bitcoin?
• Bitcoin farà raddoppiare le azioni di questa azienda nel breve?
• Analisi tecnica di Bitcoin: breve e medio periodo
👉 Iscriviti gratis al webinar LIVE o, qua…
🤖 Nvidia vuole comprare Hugging Face per 14 miliardi di dollari
Nvidia è in trattative avanzate per acquisire Hugging Face, la principale piattaforma open source per la condivisione di modelli IA. L'accordo potrebbe essere firmato già questa settimana e vale complessivamente circa 14 miliardi di dollari: 12,9 miliardi per l'acquisizione vera e propria e 1 miliardo in pacchetti di fidelizzazione per i dipendenti.
La…
🚨 Kalshi bandisce per sempre George Santos: primo lifetime ban nella storia dei prediction market
La piattaforma di prediction market Kalshi ha emesso il suo primo ban permanente contro George Santos, ex deputato repubblicano già espulso dal Congresso nel 2023. Santos avrebbe sfruttato informazioni privilegiate sulla propria posizione istituzionale per speculare su contratti predittivi legati direttamente alla sua c…
🔴 FINISCE OGGI! TUTTI I CORSI E SERVIZI -40%
Vuoi finalmente usare il tempo che hai a disposizione per imparare a investire davvero?
📈 Analisi tecnica e fondamentale
🤑 Trading su Forex e Criptovalute
🛢 Scalping su Materie Prime
📊 Macroeconomia applicata ai mercati
Sconto già attivo sul sito, nessun codice richiesto. Solo fino a stasera!
📲 ACCEDI ALLO SCONTO DEL -40%: https://academy.investire.biz/home-login
‼️ Iscriviti al Webinar di stasera - Ti aspettiamo!
Stasera, lunedì 31 agosto, al consueto Webinar delle ore 18:00, faremo come sempre il punto della situazione sui Mercati Finanziari.
Riccardo Zago e Vincenzo Penna ti aspettano per l'appuntamento di stasera!
Programma del Webinar:
• I veri dati di NVIDIA: arriverà a 300$?
• Settembre è il mese peggiore dell'anno per le borse: ecco cosa faremo;
• Aggiornamento por…
🎵 Sony e Warner citano Anthropic: fino a $150.000 per ogni canzone usata nel training
Sony Music Publishing e Warner Chappell hanno trascinato Anthropic in un tribunale della California del Nord, nominando personalmente i co-fondatori Dario Amodei e Benjamin Mann. I publisher contestano una campagna di torrenting e scraping massivo da archivi pirata come Library Genesis e Pirate Library Mirror, gli stessi già al cen…
🛍 IPO di Shein a Hong Kong con valutazione dimezzata e crescenti rischi in Europa: tu ci investirai?
💸 Sì, a questo prezzo ribassato è un'occasione18%
🛑 No, troppe incognite tra dazi e multe UE82%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @investirebiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@investirebiz edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 22 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🏗 Il modello di finanziamento fuori bilancio usato da Meta e altri (veicoli SPV, garanzie, leasing) è un rischio sistemico nascosto o uno strumento legittimo?
È un rischio nascosto ⚠️76%
È uno strumento legittimo ✅26%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🏆 Kimi K3 può diventare uno standard globale dell'AI open-weight?
Sì, ha le carte in regola 🚀58%
Resterà di nicchia 📦42%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Marco Casario Official @the10mintraderofficial · 41,296 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Rfc official channel @rfcofficialchannel · 28,641 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
Criptovaluta.it @criptovalutait · 29,534 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
Toncoin 🇮🇹 @toncoin_it · 57,367 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
The Crypto Gateway @TheCryptoGateway · 89,448 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📊 Investire.biz” (@investirebiz), 11,811 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/investirebiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.