Posted without readable text
❤8🔥7👍4

Channel
@investacademy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33,573subscribers
-161 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001131467589 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @investacademy |
| Description | Капитал семьи: как приумножить, сохранить и передать детям. Пишу то, что обычно остаётся в разговоре с клиентами. Консультация: @inwestsovetnik Сайт: https://ftg.limited Разборы: sponsr.ru/family_trust MAX: max.ru/investacademy РКН: clck.ru/3WJhDK |
| Created | 9 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 38 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/investacademy |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 33,573 | +30 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:17 | 33,543 | -3 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 12:39 | 33,546 | -37 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 33,583 | -26 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 33,609 | +11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 33,598 | +98 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 33,500 | +21 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 33,479 | -19 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 33,498 | -25 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 33,523 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 33,530 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 33,538 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:43 | 33,537 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 33,552 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 33,568 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 33,575 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 33,581 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 33,588 | -21 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 33,609 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 33,611 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 118 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (7 July 2026 – 12 October 2026) |
| Views total | 42,352 |
| Reactions total | 717 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Oct 2026, 09:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,838 reactions across 43 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 877 | 47.7% | |
| ❤ | 402 | 21.9% | |
| 🔥 | 355 | 19.3% | |
| 💯 | 132 | 7.18% | |
| 🤔 | 63 | 3.43% | |
| 🍾 | 9 | 0.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,838 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @investacademy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
❤8🔥7👍4
С 22 октября китайские власти начнут взимать 20-процентный налог на дивиденды и проценты, полученные от офшорных трастов, целенаправленно преследуя состоятельных людей, размещающих свои активы за рубежом. Китайские UHNWI, или простыми словами мультимиллионеры и миллиардеры, очень любили открывать дискреционные трасты где-нибудь в Гонконге, Сингапуре или на Кайманах и оптимизировать налоги. Все купоны, дивиденды и ре…
👍22❤6
Недавно ходил в гости к Даниилу Смирнову, поговорить о насущном. Обсудили кредиты. Есть ли риски для финансовой системы. И как в современных условиях формировать благосостояние и управлять им. Приятного просмотра: https://youtu.be/nwBWycOHg3c P.s. если у вас есть личный подкаст - смело зовите. Всегда открыт к новым знакомствам:) @investacademy
👍17🔥3🤔1
Posted without readable text
👍16❤3🔥1
Многие частные инвесторы в России считают, что инвестиции - это Мосбиржа. Мир гораздо шире, и Бразилия хорошо это показывает. В наших зарубежных портфелях Бразилия занимает почётное место, поэтому я плотно слежу за тем, что там происходит. В воскресенье прошёл первый тур президентских выборов. Флавио Болсонару, сын осуждённого экс-президента, обошёл действующего президента-социалиста Лулу да Силву, который посадил …
👍17❤1🤔1
Posted without readable text
👍51🔥25❤10
Время для второго блока моего выпуска: «Секрет устойчивости американских компаний: инвесторы начинают любить сырьё, RWA и другие странные вещи» Сегодня разберёмся в секрете высокой устойчивости американских акций. Почему эти супостаты никак не хотят падать и раз за разом подводят уважаемых аналитиков, которые уже который год пророчат им крах? Куда начинают смотреть международные инвесторы, кроме ИИ-лихорадки? ШОК-…
❤6👍5
Налог на финансовую безграмотность. На прошлой неделе Минфин внёс бюджетный пакет, где предлагает сложить дивиденды, купоны и проценты по вкладам с зарплатой и обложить по общей шкале до 22%. После этого получил ряд вопросов: что будет с акциями и облигациями? Чтобы ответить, я поднял исследования, где это уже проверяли на реальных данных. США с 1913 года, реформа Буша 2003 года, Великобритания 1997-го, муниципальн…
👍29🔥5🤔3❤2
Сегодня ещё и прекрасный повод напомнить, почему я всё время писал: если хотите инвестировать в золото, покупайте золото, а не золотодобывающие компании. Просто потому, что в любой момент может случиться вот это: Законопроектом предусмотрена донастройка налогообложения природной ренты. В секторе горно-металлургического комплекса предлагается ввести налог для отдельных добывающих организаций в размере 30% от дополните…
👍37❤8🔥2
Ну, здравствуйте. Приехал новый пакет, но уже от Минфина, он же новый бюджет. Когда в предыдущем выпуске на Sponsr я разбирал новость о том, что бюджет будут верстать исходя из цены на нефть в 50 долларов за баррель, я написал, что это ставит доходную часть в зависимость от ненефтегазовых доходов. И предположил, что правительство будет заинтересовано в развитии этого направления. Реальность оказалась менее радужной:…
👍29🔥8❤5
Posted without readable text
🔥18❤11👍8
“Как балансируете между работой и остальными занятиями? Мне уже больше хочется уделять времени своим хобби, но тогда начинаешь упускать какие-то моменты по работе. Вот и пытаюсь гоняться за всеми зайцами, но выходит так себе)) И по нервной системе работа бьёт сильно. Как решить, что хватит, и уйти в более спокойный для себя режим, пусть и с потерей части доходов?” Баланса не существует. Есть выбор, который вы делает…
🔥40❤15👍15💯1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @investacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инвестиции с Никитой Костанда” (@investacademy), 33,573 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/investacademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.