Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,370–5,404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 19:55
5,374
-5
13 Sept 2026, 08:15
5,379
-9
9 Sept 2026, 06:39
5,388
-6
4 Sept 2026, 02:58
5,394
+2
31 Aug 2026, 15:04
5,392
-1
28 Aug 2026, 05:12
5,393
+5
25 Aug 2026, 01:36
5,388
+1
21 Aug 2026, 12:14
5,387
+1
18 Aug 2026, 01:22
5,386
-3
14 Aug 2026, 22:16
5,389
-5
11 Aug 2026, 10:55
5,394
-6
7 Aug 2026, 21:30
5,400
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:26
5,400
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
70
43.2%
🔥
52
32.1%
👏
27
16.7%
👍
10
6.17%
🤔
2
1.23%
🥰
1
0.617%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
El verano: un momento idóneo para leer más y profundizar en nuevos conocimientos 🧠
¿Cómo ha empezado vuestro verano?
En mi caso, con muchas ganas de desconectar, pasar más tiempo con mi familia, disfrutar de la playa y, como cada verano, aprovechar también para leer más de lo habitual.
Desde hace unos años, compartir con vosotros las primeras 50 páginas de mis libros se ha convertido ya en una pequeña tradición ve…
Acceso a la vivienda para los más jovenes.
Me encantaría saber tu opinión al respecto. ¿Qué harías tú si fueras presidente del Gobierno para solucionar el problema de la vivienda? (puedes marcar varias opciones).
Construir mucha más vivienda pública51%
Liberalizar suelo y agilizar licencias79%
Bajar impuestos a la compra y alquiler69%
Limitar la compra por fondos e inversores13%
Eliminar topes y controles al alquiler48%
Dar ayudas directas a jóvenes12%
Nada, el mercado se regula solo3%
Otras acciones: incluye en los comentarios tu(s) propuesta(s)5%
The shares total 280%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Último día de lanzamiento: Tu Plan 2050
Hoy a medianoche acaba el periodo de lanzamiento de Tu plan 2050.
Si lo compras antes, te llevas:
- Precio reducido: 7,99 € en Kindle / 12,99 € en físico
- Descarga gratuita de Largoplacismo Inmobiliario (PDF y EPUB)
- Cuaderno de Trabajo y Checklist de seguimiento anual
En 4 días ya ha vendido 476 copias y se ha convertido en el libro de inversión más vendido en España…
📕 Hoy es el día
Después de mucho trabajo y de darlo todo, hoy es el día.
Hoy lanzo Tu plan 2050.
Es una obra con un enfoque que creo que no existe en el mercado y que por eso he necesitado escribir.
Necesitaba dar respuestas a muchas de mis preguntas al gestionar todos aquellos euros que tanto sudor nos ha costado conseguir a mí y a mi querida esposa
Creo sinceramente que no es un libro más de inversión.
Tu pla…
El último artículo que he publicado ha tenido mucha repercusión y me han llegado muchos mensajes vuestros. Bastantes opiniones a favor y algunas en contra (lógico ya que el tema da para debate).
Por si te lo perdiste, te lo dejo por aquí:
🏠 6 horas de anuncio. 123 mensajes recibidos.
Eso pasó cuando puse en alquiler una vivienda mía en el Vallés la semana pasada.
122 personas no recibirán ni una respuesta.
Creo q…
❤8🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @inversordirectivo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Acceso a la vivienda para los más jovenes.
Me encantaría saber tu opinión al respecto. ¿Qué harías tú si fueras presidente del Gobierno para solucionar el problema de la vivienda? (puedes marcar varias opciones).
Construir mucha más vivienda pública51%
Liberalizar suelo y agilizar licencias79%
Bajar impuestos a la compra y alquiler69%
Limitar la compra por fondos e inversores13%
Eliminar topes y controles al alquiler48%
Dar ayudas directas a jóvenes12%
Nada, el mercado se regula solo3%
Otras acciones: incluye en los comentarios tu(s) propuesta(s)5%
The shares total 280%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Inversor Directivo” (@inversordirectivo), 5,374 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inversordirectivo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.