Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 64 days, net -182. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Oct 2026, 21:16
84
-113
1 Oct 2026, 10:38
197
-4
16 Sept 2026, 00:20
201
-4
9 Sept 2026, 00:19
205
-10
29 Aug 2026, 16:26
215
-4
23 Aug 2026, 00:37
219
-47
8 Aug 2026, 09:01
266
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:23
266
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 28s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
978 reactions across 20 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
207
21.2%
❤🔥
124
12.7%
💔
80
8.18%
custom 5978733877785534567
71
7.26%
custom 5978972128211378693
68
6.95%
custom 5990334674646343270
56
5.73%
custom 5235755010033214345
39
3.99%
custom 5978730068149543070
34
3.48%
custom 5235542722684677365
32
3.27%
custom 5990224242447227671
30
3.07%
custom 5978570724862861476
28
2.86%
custom 5978911363014073034
26
2.66%
custom 5978999830750437050
23
2.35%
custom 5978675019553709842
22
2.25%
custom 5989833834214988781
22
2.25%
💊
17
1.74%
custom 5990089088416357978
16
1.64%
custom 5235453666537793209
15
1.53%
custom 5978973811838559013
11
1.12%
custom 5251424687111556798
10
1.02%
9 further kinds
47
4.81%
Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 978 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @inv_in_cible1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Star Wars
Anakin Skywalker or Darth Vader is a fictional character in the Star Wars franchise. This character is basically the antagonist of the original trilogy, and also in the role of Anakin Skywalker, he is one of the protagonists of the prequel trilogy. George Lucas, the creator of Star Wars, collectively referred to the first six episodic films of this series as "The Tragedy of Darth Vader".[3] He has become …
Star Wars
Anakin Skywalker or Darth Vader is a fictional character in the Star Wars franchise. This character is basically the antagonist of the original trilogy, and also in the role of Anakin Skywalker, he is one of the protagonists of the prequel trilogy. George Lucas, the creator of Star Wars, collectively referred to the first six episodic films of this series as "The Tragedy of Darth Vader".[3] He has become o…
Mr. Robot
Mr. Robot is an American television series in the genre of drama and psychological thriller[4][5][6][7][8] created by Sam Ismail. In this series, Rami Malek appeared in the role of a hacker and computer security engineer named Elliott Alderson[E1] who suffers from major depression and social anxiety disorder.[9] He is invited to the group by a mysterious person named "Mr. Robot" who is the leader of a hack…
Star Wars
Padmé Amidala Naberrie is a fictional character in the Star Wars franchise who appeared in the prequel trilogy and is portrayed by Natalie Portman. He was first mentioned indirectly in Return of the Jedi (1983). She was introduced in Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999) as the young queen of the planet Naboo and then became a senator and anti-war spokesman in the Galactic Senate. Padme is the r…
Star Wars
Anakin Skywalker or Darth Vader is a fictional character in the Star Wars franchise. This character is basically the antagonist of the original trilogy, and also in the role of Anakin Skywalker, he is one of the protagonists of the prequel trilogy. George Lucas, the creator of Star Wars, collectively referred to the first six episodic films of this series as "The Tragedy of Darth Vader".[3] He has become o…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inv_in_cible1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴀɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴡᴏʀʟᴅ” (@inv_in_cible1), 84 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inv_in_cible1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.