Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

интерактивы

@intwonh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002480389931
TypeChannel
Username@intwonh
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 5 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/intwonh

Growth

114 Aug 2026, 06:45 — 1 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 09:17 — 1 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 06:4514 Aug 2026, 09:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:171no change
14 Aug 2026, 06:451first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘480.0%
👻120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2025 to 5 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Feb 2025, 19:04 UTC20 viewsread 14 August 2026

@TrueCarat если честно, не знаю по кому архив (( но очень милое оформление! подача хорошая, базовая, на высоте. приятный архив, все очень аккуратно и нет ничего лишнего 10/10 любимый пост

5 Feb 2025, 19:04 UTC18 viewsread 14 August 2026

@gaeu1arch очень красивый архив по гаыль. оформление безумно красивое, приятное и аккуратное. еще мне очень понравилось название. скрины очень хорошие, качество хорошее 10/10 любимый пост

5 Feb 2025, 19:04 UTC13 viewsread 14 August 2026

@minvinarch ОЧЕНЬ ОЧЕНЬ качественный архив по винтер. куча качественных скринов, качество безумно хорошее. завал качественного мт, реву. стикеры очень милые, из много, не лагают … я влюбилась ну 🌟 100/10 любимый пост

5 Feb 2025, 19:04 UTC18 viewsread 14 August 2026

@ladychomi хорошенький архив по миен. колор приятный, но, не поняла почему на некоторых постах фотки с колором, а на некоторых без. подача база, аккуратная. оформа милая, ничего лишнего 9/10 любимый пост

5 Feb 2025, 19:04 UTC12 viewsread 14 August 2026

@hoon011 начинающий архив по сонхуну. скрины безумно качественные, колор красивый и нежный. стикеры не лагают, юзабельные, мт пока мало, но, думаю вы найдете свою аудиторию ! 10/10 любимый пост

5 Feb 2025, 19:04 UTC13 viewsread 14 August 2026

@kimmollika ОЧЕНЬ КРАСИВЫЙ архив по винтер. безумно приятная и милая оформа, вайб от архива очень приятный 😘 колор мне очень понравился, чб тоже. оформление аккуратное, очень зацепил архив 🤍🤏🏻 10/10 любимый пост

5 Feb 2025, 19:04 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

@truegyu1 нежнятина, очень милый архив по бомгю. очень вкусный и приятный колор, на подачу и оформление хочется смотреть и смотреть(( скрины очень качественные, моменты удачные 10/10 любимый пост

💘1

5 Feb 2025, 19:04 UTC38 viewsread 14 August 2026

@j96nl безкмно передает вайб дженни, очень аккуратно и красиво выглядит архив. скрины качественные и крутые, моменты тоже классные. красвая подача, но не советовала бы кидать 2 фотографии формата 16:9, а так, мне очень понравился архив 9.5/10 любимый пост

5 Feb 2025, 19:04 UTC12 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

@blo33m безумно качественный архив по рюджин. приятное, аккуратное оформление, мне очень зашло. скрины качественные, стикеры юзабельные, не лагают, но я бы сделала их квадратными. подача радует глаз, очень качественный архив 9.5/10 любимый пост

👻1

5 Feb 2025, 19:04 UTC12 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

@archkazuha очень красивые архив по казухе, приятная подача, радует глаз. оформа базовая, аккуратная и красивая. так же, очень приятное качество, глаз радует 10/10 любимый пост

💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @intwonh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,390,796 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“интерактивы” (@intwonh), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/intwonh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.