2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:02
10
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:09
10
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
44
Links
43
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 15 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
19
29.2%
❤
15
23.1%
👏
4
6.15%
⚡
3
4.62%
🐳
3
4.62%
👀
3
4.62%
👍
3
4.62%
🍌
2
3.08%
👨💻
2
3.08%
🦄
2
3.08%
🏆
1
1.54%
👌
1
1.54%
💘
1
1.54%
💯
1
1.54%
😇
1
1.54%
😎
1
1.54%
🙏
1
1.54%
🤩
1
1.54%
🫡
1
1.54%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2024 to 9 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧑🚀 INTERSTELLAR PRELAUNCH CALL 🪙
Prelaunch McNuggets
Launching soon! 🚀 It's important to note that launches can encounter issues. To ensure safety, it's recommended to wait for LP (Liquidity Pool) burn and revoke processes, and verify wallets/entry points. Remember to do your own research (DYOR) before getting involved.
“Remember, in the world of McNuggets Token, our profits aren't the only thing golden and cris…
🧑🚀 INTERSTELLAR GEM CALL 🪙
Hustler 404
Launching soon! 🚀 With a new team onboard, the 404 prelaunch is in progress. However, it's crucial to WAIT until it's locked, verified, and deemed safe. The project is very risky until proven otherwise, so it's strongly advised to keep an eye out for those safety measures. Remember to do your own research!
"HUSTLER" presents a collection of 250 handmade 1:1 avatars built on …
🧑🚀 INTERSTELLAR GEM CALL 🪙
$BCHAT. MC 57K
Introducing a utility suite enabling communication with blockchain functionality. It offers smart wallet access for chats, built-in trading functions, and privacy features for decentralized chats.
https://blockchat.tech
https://t.me/BlockChatErc20
Chart:
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xc3f2e068f7f0c25cb6cc3cdc2e97659aaa9d9b3c
Follow @interstellar_calls 🌙
🧑🚀 INTERSTELLAR GEM CALL 🪙
Bruce Lee's stage name was "Little Dragon," showcasing strong branding. Consider it a riskier degen play around the 15k area. A community is coming together; check out the links below and conduct your own research.
https://t.me/ETDRGN_SOL
http://enterthedragon.io/
Chart:
https://dexscreener.com/solana/596E8VYysZjWbNfqYjMANqQdKnzcu31GSxELKVc5SEow
Follow @interstellar_calls 🌙
🧑🚀 INTERSTELLAR GEM CALL 🪙
$SOL404. MC 27K
Strong branding and ticker. Chart nearing highs, so seek secure entry points. A community is emerging, explore the links below and conduct your own research.
https://t.me/SOLANA_404
https://sol404.tech/
Chart:
https://dexscreener.com/solana/7AUqhzocn4dCKGshcCFKKTnL9p3kaNBqrbBoDPBQ3Bp5
Follow @interstellar_calls 🌙
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @interstellar_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
5
vacant every time we have ever looked
@interstellar_calls named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dodocoinonsol named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@grabitsol named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@hustlererc404 named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@mcnuggetsolana named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@weareanonymoussol named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Interstellar Calls (SOL & ETH)” (@interstellar_calls), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/interstellar_calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.