Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Intel_Rus

Channel

Intel_Rus

@intelrus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,022subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001507165419
TypeChannel
Username@intelrus
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/intelrus

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0221,0321,0276 August 2026 — 1,032 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,032 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,031 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,029 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,026 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,029 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,025 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,027 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,023 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,024 subscribers27 September 2026 — 1,022 subscribers6 August 202627 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 52 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,021–1,034 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 23:161,022-2
14 Sept 2026, 04:571,024+1
4 Sept 2026, 15:161,023-4
1 Sept 2026, 02:461,027+2
28 Aug 2026, 17:041,025-4
26 Aug 2026, 01:131,029+3
23 Aug 2026, 08:161,026-2
19 Aug 2026, 13:091,028-1
16 Aug 2026, 05:571,029-2
13 Aug 2026, 01:241,031-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:031,032no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:001,032first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

729 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥31843.6%
👍15521.3%
😁8812.1%
❤8711.9%
😢415.62%
👻152.06%
🤔111.51%
🐳60.823%
🗿40.549%
🌚30.412%
😱10.137%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 729 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC218 views50 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Владивосток здорового человека 🛳️

🔥37❤5👍3😁3🐳2

4 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC427 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

О мультивселенной мало что известно. (мы в Толмачево, если что)

😁23🤔11👍2😱1

1 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC725 views49 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На злобу дня. Знаете, почему отказ двигателя - далеко не самая большая проблема, которая может случиться с большим пассажирским самолётом? Потому что их у него два. И даже при единственном работоспособном моторе аэроплан вполне себе годно летит и даже набирает высоту. В том числе, с максимальным весом и в очень жаркую погоду. Однако ж это настолько звучное и горячее событие для всяких разных инфоцыганских пабликов, …

👍33🔥13❤3

1 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC576 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤11🔥8

31 Jul 2026, 17:19 UTC682 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Это што за интересный Боинг такой 🤔

👍25

30 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC684 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ладно, день рождения в Благе я ещё не встречал 🗿

❤21🔥10👍3

27 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC839 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Не одним Владивостоком едины 💁‍♂️

🔥34

24 Jul 2026, 03:05 UTC≈1,090 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Это были самые обманчивые «условия хорошие» в моей жизни 🌚

🔥27😁14🗿4

22 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC≈1,000 views50 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Так, стоп. Это что, получается, я зря каждый раз занимался различными извращениями с фенами и ветродуйками во время фотографирования моделей на леске? Настоящие самолёты, оказывается, с неподвижными винтами летают? 😱

😁40👻6👍3❤1

20 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC876 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А это я, наконец, закончил писанину про БЛУГА и наслаждаюсь красивым небом по пути в…

👍40

18 Jul 2026, 02:26 UTC≈1,030 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ладно ещё просто на самолёте в свой день рождения летать, но вот чек на тренажере… 🗿 Асстанавитесь.

😢27🔥11👍2

17 Jul 2026, 02:38 UTC≈1,060 views84 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Необманутые ожидания. Летом 2012 года я не питал особых иллюзий относительно своего ближайшего будущего. У меня был какой-то план, и я его придерживался. Ну, то есть всё это моё поступление в лётное училище было решением в высшей степени рациональным и взвешенным. Я отчётливо понимал, что ради достижения поставленной цели необходимо будет пойти на некоторые жертвы в беззаботной молодой жизни. И, надо сказать, картин…

🔥48👍25❤11

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @intelrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Международный аэропорт Внуково
@vnukovoairport_VKO · 19,650
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Intel_Rus” (@intelrus), 1,022 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/intelrus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.