Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,692–1,757 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:17
1,699
-5
14 Sept 2026, 14:19
1,704
-3
11 Sept 2026, 01:36
1,707
-4
6 Sept 2026, 05:37
1,711
-5
2 Sept 2026, 09:23
1,716
-5
30 Aug 2026, 18:24
1,721
-6
27 Aug 2026, 22:33
1,727
-1
24 Aug 2026, 12:26
1,728
-4
20 Aug 2026, 21:25
1,732
-4
18 Aug 2026, 04:42
1,736
-5
11 Aug 2026, 04:04
1,741
-7
8 Aug 2026, 10:22
1,748
-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:01
1,749
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:40
1,749
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 49s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
172 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
132
76.7%
🔥
25
14.5%
👍
9
5.23%
👏
5
2.91%
🐳
1
0.581%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 Testnet season: CONCLUDED
600K users
7.9B XPs generated
After months of incredible testing, feedback, and growth, we are officially closing the testnet.
A massive thank you to everyone who participate you’re the bedrock of our community. 🤝
From this point forward, XPs can now ONLY be earned by staking $TRADE.
Lock in, stack your XPs, and get ready for what’s next. 💎👇
https://dashboard.integralayer.com
Announ…
We are excited to partner with @SettleMintCom as our digital asset lifecycle platform to support the compliant, onchain representation of real estate assets across the UAE and US.
🤝
Tweet
14.1k agents are working live on Integra
Every agent follows a clean, transparent lifecycle:
> Principal deploys agent, registers via AgentAuth. Gets unique on-chain ID, declares capabilities, and publishes endpoint.
> Sets strict operating boundaries (assets, size limits, counterparties), all enforced on-chain.
> Reads Asset Passports, interacts with the Global Order Book, and executes via standard EVM transacti…
Tokenizing an asset is easy.
Distribution at a global, compliant scale is where most platforms fall short.
RyzerX solves that. Institutions tokenize, onboard investors, and distribute globally, within regulated frameworks with RyzerX.
Glad to have a shared vision.
Tweet
Real estate tokenization sounds simple. It isn't.
On May 19, @StoboxCompany and Integra are hosting a live session that walks through what it actually takes.
Register to grab a seat: https://streamyard.com/watch/MqYn59PFPerG
Tweet
Objects in mirror are closer than they appear.
100k 🎉
We love the overwhelming response 🫶
Tweet
👏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @integraofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
12
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
12
vacant every time we have ever looked
@integraofficial named 12 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@settlemintcom named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@buildinginc named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@investbaycom named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@nityacapital named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@prypcocom named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@realsplit_inc named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@realtyx_dao named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@stoboxcompany named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@toyowofficial named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@valereumplc named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@blackmantacap named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@zoniqxinc named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Integra” (@integraofficial), 1,699 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/integraofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.