Channel
@instituteforhistoricalreview
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,346subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001375599238 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @instituteforhistoricalreview |
| Created | 27 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/instituteforhistoricalreview |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 2,346 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 2,351 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:35 | 2,350 | +5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 2,345 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:14 | 2,348 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 2,350 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 2,348 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 2,354 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 2,357 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:40 | 2,364 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 2,365 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 2,366 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 2,366 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
257 reactions across 17 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 257 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Before America entered World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt was secretly collaborating with British intelligence to pull the United States into the conflict against Germany despite overwhelming public opposition to another European war. The operation was extensive and deliberately hidden from the American people. Winston Churchill himself was blunt about Britain’s strategy. He told his son: “I shall drag the Un…
💯21
In 2012, the owner and publisher of a major Jewish community newspaper wrote that Israel’s leaders should order the assassination of a U.S. President if he was deemed “unfriendly” to Israel. The column appeared in the Atlanta Jewish Times. Full article with quotes, sources, and Mark Weber’s analysis: - https://ihr.org/other/AtlantaJewishTimesAdler Original article HQ: - https://archive.is/HaoI Gawker Links (remove…
💯14
When you arrest a bunch of Marxist revolutionaries, you shouldn't be surprised to have arrested a lot of Jews... “Rosa Luxemburg was also Jewish by ancestry. It was true, said Weber, that Jews were very disproportionately involved in the Communist movement both in Germany and in other countries.” https://www.ihr.org/books/kulaszka/20weber.html
💯26
In the final chaotic days of the Second World War, as Germany faced total collapse, Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz was suddenly thrust into an unexpected position of leadership. To his complete astonishment, Adolf Hitler had named him successor in his last political testament. Dönitz later reflected that he believed the appointment was meant to allow a senior military officer to bring the conflict to an end. “This took m…
💯25
One of the most intriguing “what if” episodes of the Second World War is Rudolf Hess’s daring solo flight to Britain in May 1941. In this moving account written by his son, we learn how Hess, then Hitler’s deputy, took off in a Messerschmitt 110 on a personal mission to end the tragic conflict between two nations he admired. The available evidence suggests Hitler knew in advance, yet the flight remains shrouded in my…
💯11
One of the most suppressed chapters in modern American history is the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty. Survivor and author James Ennes describes how what officials called “friendly fire” was in reality a prolonged, carefully coordinated assault. It has been called the most carefully planned “accident” in the history of warfare. Even after a torpedo explosion, Israeli boats pulled close enough to read the ship’…
💯15
History often hides surprising details about how the modern world was shaped. During the Bolshevik Revolution that transformed Russia and influenced the 20th century, Jews, who made up only about five percent of the population, played a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role in the infant Bolshevik regime, effectively dominating the Soviet government during its early years. Key figures such as Leon Trotsk…
💯19
Marlon Brando was right: 'Hollywood is run by Jews. Jewish insiders confirm it: 'Yes, we control Hollywood... I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government.' -Joel Stein, LA Times, 2008 How does this shape global culture & values today? https://ihr.org/other/hollywoodagenda_weber-html #Hollywood #MediaPower #CulturalInfluence
💯23
The SPLC's inditement should lead us to question the legitimacy of other institutions whose mission is to censor opinions. Pete McCloskey, Jr. served in congress from 1967 to 1983 and addressed the IHR conference regarding the influence of the ADL and hope for those who still seek the truth despite persecution. "When people finally learn the truth, they turn against those who have been lying to them...if the moveme…
💯22
Is the tide turning on the war in Iran? In a new article for the Ron Paul Institute, former Rep. John J. Duncan Jr. explores why the current conflict in Iran may be becoming the "most unpopular war in US history." 🔹 An Unpopular War: Unlike the overwhelming support seen after Pearl Harbor (97%) or even the start of the Iraq War (76%), support for the Iran conflict is hovering in the low 20-30% range in many polls. …
💯8
Texas school required reading list good for the Jews? No Hispanic authors, but 'Holocaust education' is well represented... Says Laney Hawes: "‘The Diary of Anne Frank’ is an incredible book.” (indeed...) Another 'incredible' book, Elie Wiesel’s Holocaust memoir “Night”, is also on the list (it might actually be a good test for a student's critical reading abilities). https://www.jta.org/2026/02/09/united-states/ann…
💯13
⚡️NEW EPISODE! 🎙 GTK Radio's -WEEKLY ROUNDUP #169- 🔥 2-HOUR GRAND FINALE & AMA ► In this episode: Why we are ending the Weekly Roundup ▪️ Other projects going forward ▪️ What we tried to accomplish with the WR ▪️ An antidote to reactionary thinking ▪️ Historical consciousness ▪️ Events are vindicating our outlook ▪️ A vibe shift: Glasnost in the West ▪️ Euro-American relationship breaking down ▪️ Did communist in…
💯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @instituteforhistoricalreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Institute For Historical Review - IHR” (@instituteforhistoricalreview), 2,346 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/instituteforhistoricalreview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.