Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Натали Солдаева | Информатика ЕГЭ | insperia

@insperia_info

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,173subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001730656890
TypeChannel
Username@insperia_info
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/insperia_info

Growth

2,1732,2122,192.57 August 2026 — 2,212 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,209 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,187 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,173 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,167–2,218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:082,173-14
11 Aug 2026, 07:512,187-22
8 Aug 2026, 09:362,209-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:022,212first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.52%
avg views ÷ 2,173 subscribers
Avg views / post
163
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,288
Reactions total81
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2935.8%
💯1619.8%
😁911.1%
💘89.88%
🔥89.88%
❤‍🔥44.94%
🥰33.70%
😘22.47%
😍11.23%
🦄11.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC59 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Натали, большое спасибо за подготовку к инфе! Поступила на бюджет в московский политех

6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC145 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ПЛЮС 34-40 баллов по инфе ждут тебя в файле ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ И они кроются в электронных таблицах!! Это второй по важности (и по сложности 😅) после проги инструмент, который надо освоить как можно раньше Таблицами можно решить номера 3, 18, 22, иногда 9 и даже иногда 26 + они нужны для задания 27 и других заданий, где нужно визуально покопаться в данных Ну а вооб

6🔥3💘1

6 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC159 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Чемпионы мои, где в основном смотрите шортсы?

  1. ТикТок62%
  2. Ютубчик19%
  3. Инста29%
  4. ВК10%
  5. Ниче не смотрю, я ботаю7%
  6. Ниче не смотрю, я сплю19%

The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC163 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне стирают память, и я впервые могу изучить эту формулу: xyi ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Сегодня узнали все про кодирование картинок и нарешали куууучу задач Лови записи с кэмпа по кодированию: 🔴Кодирование и декодирование, условие Фано, задание 4: ЮТ / ВК 🔴Количество информации, формула Хартли, задание 11: ЮТ / ВК 🔴Кодирование изображений, инфоомационный объем графическо

3💯2😘2

5 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC154 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Уже через час мы начинаем!! ⚡️Сегодня в 12:00 по Мск разбираемся с кодированием изображений и учимся решать первый тип задания 7 ⚡️ Ссылки на стрим 👇 📱 ЮТ 📱 ВК Жду тебя 💕

3❤‍🔥2💘2

4 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC165 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Просто моя переписка с контент-менеджером в час ночи Не спрашивайте, зачем, мне самой пока не сказали… Делаем?

💯14😁9❤‍🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC164 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ЗАВТРА В 12:00 вскрываем изображения без анестезии 😱 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Приходи на стрим!! Будем лутать легкие баллы, все как мы любим)) ⚪️разберемся, как кодируются изображения и почему мы иногда видим пиксели, а иногда нет ⚪️узнаем самую любимую формулу x*y*i ⚪️научимся решать задание 7 + будет домашка для закрепления Ссылки на стрим 👇 📱 ЮТ 📱 ВК Занимай время

2💘2🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC137 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC160 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 СЮРПРИЗ!!! Мы открываем набор на 2-ю смену INSPERIA КЭМПА Она пройдёт с 2️⃣5️⃣по 2️⃣9️⃣августа. За это время продолжим подготовку по русскому, профильной математике, информатике, биологии и обществознанию. Напоминаю, что уже в августе заберешь +40 баллов к результату по ЕГЭ! ❗️Программа второй смены НЕ совпадает с первой, поэтому тебя ждут новые темы, вебинары и практика после каждого занятия. По выбранным предме

1😍1

3 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC203 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Черепаха рассказала мне секрет 🤫 Лошадь была в шоке 😨 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Чтобы всегда правильно решать задание 6 на черепаху, нужно помнить 5️⃣ важных пунктов: 1️⃣По умолчанию в Питоне черепаха направлена по оси абсцисс (вправо), значит если в задании сказано, что изначально черепаха повернута вверх, нужно написать команду lt(90). А в Кумире черепаха изначально напра

3🥰3💘1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC183 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Карты, деньги, ДВА задания на логику 🔫 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Собрала файл, где у нас с вами вся теория и все способы решения заданий на логику — 2 и 15 В чем прикол? Задачки на логику (как и вообще всю информатику) надо не зубрить, а понимать, поэтому ОЧЕНЬ ВАЖНО разобраться в теории, а потом уже переходить к заданиям А если еще и вспомнить, что задание 15 иногда не

2❤‍🔥1💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @insperia_info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

Чемпионы мои, где в основном смотрите шортсы?

  1. ТикТок62%
  2. Ютубчик19%
  3. Инста29%
  4. ВК10%
  5. Ниче не смотрю, я ботаю7%
  6. Ниче не смотрю, я сплю19%

The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 956,897 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Натали Солдаева | Информатика ЕГЭ | insperia” (@insperia_info), 2,173 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insperia_info.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.