Inspecta Official Dash Utlity V.1 https://dash.inspecta.tech/

Channel
INSPECTA | Cryptocurrency Project Auditor And Launchpad
@inspectaannouncement
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001754578161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inspectaannouncement |
| Created | 10 November 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inspectaannouncement |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 24 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 24 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 10 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 13 | 27.1% | |
| 🐳 | 12 | 25.0% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 10.4% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 😴 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2022 to 19 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
We got full support from Gubbins ! We are having a AMA in his channel on the 18th of November at 15:00 UTC ! Mark the date & Time ! Because this is something you don't want to miss ! There will be a big surprise !
🐳8❤4
INSPECTA | Cryptocurrency Project Auditor And Launchpad pinned a photo
INSPECTA | Cryptocurrency Project Auditor And Launchpad is currently safeguarded by MEVFree Guardian. Tap below to begin human verification.
Inspecta is building a Safe Analyzer Dashboard, where user's will be able to statistically analyze their profits and loss, safe scan smart contract's, and also follow and be followed by user's to check their purchase's and where they are earning profits from. There also will be a launch calendar where user's can save projects by their date's of launch. With a Special Inspecta page that list's projects that have condu…
👌4🐳1👍1
INSPECTA BSC Stealth Launch Tax 10/10 Locked Inspecta is a KYC , Audit and Launchpad platform Utilities are based on safety Our one in all platform will be a dashboard for user's to keep track of their Profit and Loss, Projects they entered and also have a safe smart contract scanner TG : https://t.me/inspectaannouncement
INSPECTA | Cryptocurrency Project Auditor And Launchpad pinned «Website is officially live https://inspecta.tech/»
Website is officially live https://inspecta.tech/
👍2🔥2
INSPECTA | Cryptocurrency Project Auditor And Launchpad is currently safeguarded by MEVFree Guardian. Tap below to begin human verification.
Tokenomic Inspecta - Smart Contract BSC - Supply : 1000.000.000 - Locked Supply : 800.000.000 ( 80% ) - CEX Locked Supply : 100.000.000 ( 10% ) - Team Locked Supply : 50.000.000 ( 5% ) - Staking Locked Supply : 50.000.000 ( 5% ) - Tax °Buy : 10 °Sell : 10 Distribution : Marketing 5% , RND 3% , LP 2% - Symbol : $INST - Decimal : 18
🔥3
INSPECTA | Cryptocurrency Project Auditor And Launchpad pinned «Official Contract 0x1f7d1ce89810a73aee8bbe5716ee54d5d1588a16 (tap copy) Safe for buy ✅»
Official Contract 0x1f7d1ce89810a73aee8bbe5716ee54d5d1588a16 (tap copy) Safe for buy ✅
🔥7🐳1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @inspectaannouncement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,254,982 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INSPECTA | Cryptocurrency Project Auditor And Launchpad” (@inspectaannouncement), 24 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inspectaannouncement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.