Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Денежный Инсайд

@insaidmoney

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

67subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003675862869
TypeChannel
Username@insaidmoney
Description💰 Денежный Инсайд — канал о реальном заработке в интернете 📈 Связки, сайты, боты, фишки и актуальные способы дохода 🚫 Без воды и мотивационного мусора 📊 Разборы, инсайды, цифры и личный опыт
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 27 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/insaidmoney

Growth

679 Aug 2026, 13:02 — 67 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:30 — 67 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 13:0210 Aug 2026, 01:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66–68 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 01:3067no change
9 Aug 2026, 13:0267first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2972.5%
🆒25.00%
🍓25.00%
👨‍💻25.00%
🤪25.00%
❤‍🔥12.50%
💅12.50%
😁12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Советую присмотреться к этому проекту, сейчас я готовлю для вас что то новое.

😁1

8 Jun 2026, 13:23 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Делаем что то новое?

👨‍💻21❤‍🔥1

26 Apr 2026, 21:01 UTCviews —

Денежный Инсайд pinned «Что сделать следующим обзором»

15 Feb 2026, 09:46 UTC202 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🚀 Вышло новое видео! Хотите реально зарабатывать на играх, приложениях, заданиях и опросах без вложений? 💸 Я протестировал платформу и делюсь честным обзором! 🎬 Смотреть видео: https://youtu.be/MTgZJ0lCUbk 💻 Ссылка на проект из видео: https://www.coinpayu.com/?r=V996930 💡 В видео я показываю, как проходить задания, опросы, офферы и зарабатывать реальные деньги онлайн! Не пропустите — начинайте зарабатывать прямо се

3

15 Feb 2026, 07:23 UTC187 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

⚠️ Сегодня на канале выходит новый ролик. Без спойлеров. Без описаний. Скажу одно — после него многие по-другому посмотрят на то, что считают «заработком». Публикация уже сегодня. Не пропусти.

3

8 Feb 2026, 16:28 UTC202 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Давайте решим вместе 👇 Какой способ заработка проверить следующим?

  1. 💻 Сайты с заданиями (без вложений)23%
  2. 🤖 Telegram-боты (платят или нет)48%
  3. 📱 Мобильные приложения6%
  4. 🎮 Игры с выводом денег10%
  5. 🧪 Что-то новое и рискованное (тест на себе)13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2🍓1

5 Feb 2026, 17:55 UTC201 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

💰 Заработок без вложений на играх в 2026 — реально ли это? Вышло новое видео, где я проверяю сайт, который платит за: — игры — задания — активность Без сказок и «лёгких денег» — показываю, как всё работает на самом деле и кому это вообще имеет смысл. 🎥 Смотреть видео: https://youtu.be/mzW18sg204k 🔗 Сайт (проект) из видео: https://freecash.com/r/SVUPK ⚠️ Важно: это не пассивный доход, а обмен времени на деньги. В

2🍓1

4 Feb 2026, 21:09 UTC161 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Что сделать следующим обзором

  1. Сайт для заработка – проверяем реальные способы, где реально можно получить деньги.56%
  2. Telegram-бот для заработка – разбор ботов, которые обещают доход, но где скрытые нюансы.44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🆒2

4 Feb 2026, 21:08 UTC155 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

💰 Новый обзор! Помогите выбрать тему Привет! 👋 Хочу снять следующий обзор, но не могу решить, что будет интереснее для вас: ❓ Голосуйте ниже и пишите в комментариях, если знаете классные сайты или боты, которые стоит проверить. 🎯 Самые интересные предложения попадут в обзор!

🤪2

30 Jan 2026, 20:18 UTC157 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🚨 Не забываем посмотреть новый ролик! И посмотрите мои другие ролики там много интересных способов заработка. Пожалуйста, посмотрите его до конца, поставьте лайк и оставьте комментарий. Каждое ваше действие очень важно — сейчас мы боремся с алгоритмом YouTube и это реально помогает! 💪

2

30 Jan 2026, 11:59 UTC159 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔥 Вышло новое видео на YouTube! В ролике я показал Telegram-бота, который реально платит 💸 Без вложений, простые действия и честный разбор — со всеми плюсами и минусами. 📺 Смотреть видео: https://youtu.be/YD3w-EYCCVk?si=ZS1l5tNah_RJVN9Q 🤖 Бот из видео: http://t.me/cryptofaucetzone_bot/cryptofaucet?startapp=6371748111 💬 Пиши в комментариях под видео, стоит ли делать продолжение и обзоры похожих проектов 👇

2

29 Jan 2026, 19:13 UTC137 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🚀 Готовлю новое видео на завтра! На этот раз я тестирую новый способ заработка онлайн — и готов показать всё честно и подробно. 💡 Хочешь узнать, какой бот или сайт реально платит? Подписывайся на канал и следи за обновлениями — будет интересно!

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @insaidmoney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Feb 2026, 16:28 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Давайте решим вместе 👇 Какой способ заработка проверить следующим?

  1. 💻 Сайты с заданиями (без вложений)23%
  2. 🤖 Telegram-боты (платят или нет)48%
  3. 📱 Мобильные приложения6%
  4. 🎮 Игры с выводом денег10%
  5. 🧪 Что-то новое и рискованное (тест на себе)13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Feb 2026, 21:09 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

Что сделать следующим обзором

  1. Сайт для заработка – проверяем реальные способы, где реально можно получить деньги.56%
  2. Telegram-бот для заработка – разбор ботов, которые обещают доход, но где скрытые нюансы.44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Jan 2026, 17:08 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

Делаем новый способ зароботка?

  1. Делаем! 💰67%
  2. Когда не делали?33%
  3. Нет🙁0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 8 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 596,794 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Денежный Инсайд” (@insaidmoney), 67 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insaidmoney.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.