Video, posted without a caption
❤2

Channel
@inqtg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
570subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003263213467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inqtg |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inqtg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 570 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 572 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 571 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 570 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:09 | 570 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
71 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 80.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 8.45% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 3 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
❤2
The “fleas in a jar” analogy shows how limits get learned. Fleas are put in a jar with a lid, and every time they jump, they hit it. After a while, they stop jumping high and only go as far as they think they’re allowed. Even when the lid is removed, they still don’t escape because they’ve been conditioned to believe the limit is still there. It represents how people adapt to failure or restrictions and end up hold…
❤13💯2
-15 isnt the worry here the worry is the way i traded it so just need to fix that and be better
👀1
next time when i size in it will be earlier and on read not green lessons learned from this trade
meaningful words from the goat papa kobra
❤6
better days ahead iA
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
seems as though the coin i tried to size into went only down gonna get off until tmrrw down way too much adios
in terms of buying and sizing into this i did really good, right when i got back to my screen and understood the narra i bought a decent amount however i executed it poorly bcz i didnt sell because i thought it would go higher was up 100 at top and roundtripped to end up making 25 im glad i was able to jus buy without needing confluence from a vc or anything and just bought based off my own intuition and thesis …
❤5👍3
journal #25 i think a big reason that im losing more than usual recently is bcz the past couple of weeks ive been trading for the journal and scared to take Ls, leading me to make money ofc, but missing out on making a lot more because of the risk of ending the week negative and embarrassing myself, thinking too much of my balance, etc. but now that i kinda detached my mind from that ive kind of been going risk on …
❤4
lesson learned
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inqtg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Inquixit Journals” (@inqtg), 570 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inqtg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.