2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 22:54
222
no change
28 Aug 2026, 17:31
222
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.2%
avg views ÷ 222 subscribers
Avg views / post
87.0
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
20 (10 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
1,741
Reactions total
109
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
109 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
38
34.9%
❤🔥
20
18.3%
😭
8
7.34%
😢
7
6.42%
💘
5
4.59%
👍
4
3.67%
👏
4
3.67%
🔥
4
3.67%
😍
4
3.67%
💯
3
2.75%
😁
3
2.75%
🤣
3
2.75%
👌
1
0.917%
💔
1
0.917%
🕊
1
0.917%
🙏
1
0.917%
🤩
1
0.917%
🥰
1
0.917%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
أستغفر الله العظيم الذي لا إله إلا هو الحي القيوم وأتوب إليه لي ولوالدي وللمؤمنين والمؤمنات والمسلمين والمسلمات الأحياء منهم والأموات
لا إله إلا الله العظيم الحليم لا إله إلا الله رب العرش العظيم
لا إله إلا الله رب السموات والأرض رب العرش الكريم
و صلى الله على سيدنا محمد و اله و صحبه و سلم
وهل يبلغ المرء نعيم الرضى
إلا بعد وخزات الألم؟
أو يعرف لذة المعية
حتى يتجرّع مرارة التّيه؟
أو يذوق برد المناجاة
إلا بعد حرّ المعاناة
أو يستشعر قرار الآخرة
إلا بفيح مصائب الدّنيا
إنها العثرات التي
يقدرها الله في دروبنا لتدلنا إليه
وتعرفنا عليه وتردنا إليه الرد الجميل
#A
إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون في ما أصاب أهالينا في جيجل وسائر المناطق المتضررة من الحرائق نسأل الله أن يرفع عنهم هذا البلاء عاجلا غير آجل وأن يحفظهم من كل سوء ويكتب لهم السلامة والعافية
اللهم كن لهم عونا ونصيرا واحفظ أهلنا وأطفالهم وكبارهم واحفظ بيوتهم وأرزاقهم وسخر لهم من يعينهم وينقذهم اللهم ارحم ضعفهم وآمن خوفهم واجبر كسرهم وعوض كل من خسر خيرا مما فقد
اللهم أطفئ عنهم النيران وأنزل عليهم غيثا نافعا واجعل بعد الخوف أمنا…
هل مات ساعي البريد؟
أم أن الرسائل لم تعد لنا؟
أم لعلها ما زالت تُكتب... لكنها ضلت طريقها إلينا؟
أو ربما كانت رسائلنا تصل فعلا… لكن إلى العنوان الخطأ....
أو لعلنا نحن الذين غيرنا عناويننا دون أن نخبر أحدا!!!
أحيانا أتساءل: هل تغير العالم... أم أننا نحن الذين لم نعد أولئك الذين كانت الرسائل تصل إليهم؟
هل جف الحبر..؟ أم جفت فينا الرغبة في أن نقرأ ما قد وُجِه إلينا؟
لعل ساعي البريد لم يمت…
لعله فقط تعب من طرق الأبواب الت…
أتساءل!
كيف كان شعور سيدنا موسى حينما قال له ربه:
"قَد أوتِيتَ سُؤلكَ يَا مُوسَى.."
اللهم آتِنا سُؤلنا..
وامنُن علينا برحمتك مرات أُخَر
وألق علينا محبة منك و أصنعنا على عينك ♥️
من أفزعك؟
من خاض عَالَمَك الجميل وعاثَ فيه وروّعَك!
من أحزنك؟
من هزَّ تحليق الطيور وجرحك !
قل لي ...من أطفأك؟
وأعاد للدنيا الظلام ومزقك!
سأكون دوما جانبك... كي أفهمك
لا تبتئس إنّي معك...ولقد أتيتُ لأسمعَك
هذي يدي أمسك بها
جاءت لتمحو أدمُعَك
أسند برأسك هاهنا
وانسَ الذي قد أوجعك!
#Calestis
نأتي إلى الدنيا ونحن سواسيه
طفل الملوك كطفل الحاشية
ونغادر الدنيا ونحن كما ترى
متشابهون على قبور حافيه
أعمالنا تُعلي وتُخفض شأننا
وحسابنا بالحق يوم الغاشية
حور، وأنهار، قصور عالية
وجهنم تُصلى، ونار حامية
فاختر لنفسك ما تحب وتبتغي
ما دام يومك والليالي باقية
وغداً مصيرك لا تراجع بعده
إما جنان الخلد وإما الهاوية.
-أبو العتاهية-
#LN
أُريده…
لا!
بل أريد نسيانَهُ
وأشتاقُهُ...ثم ألعنُ أشجانَهُ
أعاتبُهُ في الليل والليل شاهد
وأدعو له في الصبح رغم هجرانَهُ
أقول: كفاني أيها الغائب عني
ثم أحن لظلِّه
كأن فؤادي لا يطيق هجرانَهُ
نهاري يقولُ: انسَه!
وليلي يقولُ: عُدْ!
فيا قلب من ذا يستحق عصيانَهُ؟
أحبُّهُ… كلا
أكره الحب بعده
ولكن قلبي كلما هرب… أتاهُ
#A
وكلُّهم يا سيدي...على أوتار الكذب يعزفون
وبألحان الزور في أسماع الغافلين يترنَّمون
يصوغونَ من الغدر تاجا... به يفتخرون
وينسجون من الوهم ثوبا به يتزينون
يُنادون بالصدق لغوا... وهمْ به يخونون
ويلعنون الخداع وفي الخفاء هم يقتاتون
#Calestis
❤🔥2👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inotherlifeeeee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Epistles to the Abyss : رسائل لن تصل...🍂” (@inotherlifeeeee), 222 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inotherlifeeeee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.