Photo, posted without a caption
custom 57875165221088173167custom 53685157219176418201

Channel
@inoploneta
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
55subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002241316813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inoploneta |
| Description | 𓀞𓀟𓀠𓀡𓀢𓀣𓀤𓀥𓀦𓀧𓀨𓀩𓀫𓀬𓀳𓀻𓀽𓀾𓀿𓀀𓀁𓀉𓀊𓀋𓀌𓀍𓀎𓀏𓀐𓀑𓀒𓀓𓀔𓀕𓀖𓀗𓁀𓀘𓀙𓀚𓀛𓀜𓀝𓁁𓁂𓁃𓁄𓀀𓀓𓀔𓀕𓀖𓀗𓀘𓀙𓀚𓀓𓀔𓀕𓀖𓀗𓀘𓀙𓀚𓀨𓀩𓀪𓀫𓀬𓀨𓀩𓀪𓀫𓀬𓀰𓀱𓀲𓀳𓀴𓀵𓀰𓀱𓀲𓀳𓀖𓀗𓀙𓀚𓀛𓀜𓀝𓀙𓀚𓀛𓀜𓀝𓀩 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 9 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inoploneta |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 55 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 55 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
214 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5787516522108817316 | 114 | 53.3% | |
| custom 5798659909247569699 | 41 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5393123749924984737 | 17 | 7.94% | |
| custom 5800677242501599199 | 14 | 6.54% | |
| custom 5801132758143078355 | 6 | 2.80% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 2.80% | |
| custom 5800693292794384970 | 5 | 2.34% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 1.87% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.40% | |
| custom 5368515721917641820 | 1 | 0.467% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 0.467% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.467% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.467% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2024 to 10 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @inoploneta. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2024 to 10 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 57875165221088173167custom 53685157219176418201
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 57875165221088173166custom 58011327581430783554custom 57986599092475696993
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 57875165221088173165
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 57875165221088173168custom 57986599092475696994
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 57875165221088173169
мы с другом записали реакцию на трек и хотим сделать обращение к этому жалкому землянику! Вест Кайне, ты озадачил нас крайне Ты как плоть, даже хуже! Наше терпение не безкрайне! Ох канье каканье…
custom 578751652210881731612custom 58011327581430783552custom 57986599092475696991
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 57986599092475696999custom 57875165221088173163😭2🤯1
Posted without readable text
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 58006932927943849705🤯4
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53931237499249847378custom 57875165221088173162😭1
Друзья напоминаю вам ято теперь мы интернациональое объединение
custom 53931237499249847378🤯1😭1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 57875165221088173167❤1👏1custom 53931237499249847371
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inoploneta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы как считаете подписщики
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2024 to 10 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“иноплонетяне” (@inoploneta), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inoploneta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.