Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

πŸ¦„ Startups & VCs (Web3, AI & SaaS)

@innmind

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

4,318subscribers

+40 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001053918995
TypeChannel
Username@innmind
Created24 May 2016 β€” measured β€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/innmind

Growth

4,2784,3184,2985 August 2026 β€” 4,278 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 4,278 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 4,279 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 4,296 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 4,318 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,272–4,324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:374,318+22
9 Aug 2026, 03:534,296+17
6 Aug 2026, 10:414,279+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:064,278no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:224,278first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
16.9%
avg views Γ· 4,318 subscribers
Avg views / post
729
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.412%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total7,290
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯1624.6%
πŸ‘1015.4%
❀913.8%
πŸ’―812.3%
πŸ™710.8%
🀩69.23%
πŸ€”46.15%
🍌34.62%
🀣23.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC332 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ“… 10 Must-Attend Web3 & AI Events Before the End of 2026 Looking for the right conference to meet investors, partners, clients, or fellow builders? 🌍 We've just added a fresh batch of Web3, AI, blockchain, and fintech events to the InnMind Events Calendar Make it a habit to check the calendar regularly. It's one of the easiest ways to discover valuable networking opportunities, stay on top of industry trends, and …

πŸ‘2❀1

3 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC651 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

πŸš€ Before You Sign With Any Crypto Launchpad... Most founders compare launchpads by community size, marketing reach, or past sold-out rounds. Very few ask the questions that can determine whether their startup actually has enough capital to execute after TGE. After analyzing AlphaMind's latest research, we turned the findings into practical advice for Web3 founders. Here are questions every founder should ask befo…

πŸ”₯4

31 Jul 2026, 12:43 UTC722 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ’° Your IDO Raise May Be Smaller Than You Think Most founders celebrate one number after an IDO: "We hit our hard cap!" πŸŽ‰ But here's a tougher question: How much of that capital actually stays with your project after the refund window closes? AlphaMind has published an eye-opening research report on crypto launchpad refunds. While the report was created for retail investors, it reveals several lessons every Web3 fo…

πŸ‘2πŸ€”1

29 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC698 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

πŸš€ Free PDF: 19 Verified Web3 Accelerators for 2026 Finding the right accelerator shouldn't feel like a research project. That's why we prepared a free list of 19 active Web3 accelerators with verified application links and short founder-focused notes, so you can spend less time searching and more time applying. Inside you'll find: βœ… 19 active accelerator programs πŸ”— Verified application links πŸ’‘ A short description …

πŸ™2

27 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC767 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨 BitMEX & BitMart Are Shutting Down. Here's Why Web3 Founders Should Pay Attention Two crypto exchanges, BitMEX and BitMart, recently announced they are winding down operations. While the headlines may look alarming, the bigger story is what these closures reveal about where the crypto industry is heading. πŸ‘‡ BitMEX had been losing relevance for years after regulatory issues, declining trading volumes, and a shrink…

πŸ’―4🀣1

24 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC872 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸͺ™ MongoDB Credits to Help Your Startup Build Faster MongoDB is one of the world's leading database platforms, trusted by developers to build modern, scalable applications. Its technology powers millions of applications across industries, making it a go-to choice for startups and global enterprises alike. If you're building an early-stage startup, this perk gives you everything you need to strengthen your infrastruc…

πŸ™2

23 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC718 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Crypto VC is changing faster than most founders realize. This week Haseeb (Dragonfly) dropped a pretty fancy blunt take: β€œCrypto VC will be gone by 2030.” The pure narrative, no-PMF, β€œraise $50-80M on vision alone” era is clearly ending. Deal volume is at multi-year lows. Capital is getting more selective and moving toward projects that can actually survive without constant fundraising. We’re seeing the same shift…

πŸ€”1

21 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC725 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ’° Smart Money Keeps Building Our big Perk Club update stole the spotlight last week, but there's one important story we wanted to come back to today πŸ‘‡ Citadel Securities has invested $400M in Crypto.com at a $20B valuation, marking the exchange's first institutional fundraising round. While the crypto market remains volatile, one of the world's largest market makers is betting on where the industry is heading next.…

πŸ‘2πŸ’―2❀1🍌1πŸ™1

17 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC969 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸš€ 546 active Web3 investors. One spreadsheet. Zero guesswork. Still spending hours searching for investors who stopped writing checks months ago? Or sending cold messages that never get a reply? πŸ˜… Our new Web3 VC & Investor Database 2026 helps you skip the research and start conversations with investors who are actively deploying capital today. Inside you'll find: 🎯 546 verified Web3 investors, including 204 prio…

πŸ™2

15 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC836 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸš€ Claim Claude API Credits from Anthropic and Unlock More Startup Benefits A few days ago, we mentioned that we've added a bunch of new perks to the InnMind Perks Club. Today, we're giving you a closer look πŸ”Ž We've partnered with some of the best startup programs to help founders save money, build faster, and scale smarter: πŸ’Ž Anthropic: Apply for Claude for Startups and get free API credits, priority rate limits, …

πŸ‘1

14 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC690 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hmmm… seems something is missing here πŸ€”

🀩2πŸ’―1🀣1

13 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC760 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸš€ Building a Gen-AI startup? Here's a perk worth claiming. Rabata provides enterprise-grade S3-compatible cloud storage built for demanding AI workloads. Through the InnMind Perks Club, eligible startups can apply for a $100,000 Rabata Grant in the form of free storage credits. If you're building products powered by generative AI, large datasets, AI-generated video or audio, or training pipelines, this grant can s…

❀3🀩3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @innmind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 113,394 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸ¦„ Startups & VCs (Web3, AI & SaaS)” (@innmind), 4,318 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/innmind.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.