Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for INMW

Channel

INMW

@inmotionwearr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,192subscribers

+68 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002142692969
TypeChannel
Username@inmotionwearr
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/inmotionwearr

Growth

6,1146,2206,1677 August 2026 — 6,124 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,123 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,114 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,201 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,214 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,215 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,213 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,220 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,212 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,192 subscribers6,1927 August 20265 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net +68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,098–6,236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 06:156,192-20
1 Sept 2026, 06:496,212-8
29 Aug 2026, 14:136,220+7
23 Aug 2026, 19:036,213-2
19 Aug 2026, 22:346,215+1
16 Aug 2026, 21:546,214+13
13 Aug 2026, 13:496,201+87
10 Aug 2026, 07:286,114-9
7 Aug 2026, 13:576,123-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:166,124first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.9%
avg views ÷ 6,192 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,790
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held9 (30 May 202610 August 2026)
Views total1,790
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,160 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
55948.2%
💘40434.8%
💋19717.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC≈1,790 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Будьте осторожны, никакой брони и предоплат нет 🙏🏻 Покупку можно будет совершить только на сайте inmw.ru, какие-то уточнения по заказу я могу писать только с аккаунта @hatawax или через аккаунт поддержки @inmwsupport всех люблю! ❤️

41💋23

9 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈2,330 views216 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Все, я вас услышала 😋 В ближайшее время все реализую, боксы появятся в продаже на сайте, обязательно дам анонс, так как количество будет ограниченным 🐾

141💘43💋32

9 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈2,350 views426 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Девчата, нужна ваша обратная связь!❤️ В общем, у меня накопилось очень много «пробников»/сэмплов из позиций, которые так и не вышли в продажу и что-то нужно с ними делать 🥲 Как насчет чего-то вроде мистери бокса? 1 бокс = 5-6 позиций (шорты/леггинсы/штаны/топы/футболки и т.д.) Боксы будут разделены на размеры S/M/L, стоимость будет фиксированной в 3.500₽, позиции из бокса не будут подлежать обмену/возврату Жду ваш

💘230137💋59

5 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈3,460 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Самые нежные оттенки уже на сайте! inmw.ru ✨

28💘14💋11

4 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC≈3,080 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

И еще одна новиночка в трех оттенках: брючки-клеш с идеальнейшей посадкой на ягодицах, отлично подойдут для осени и зимы! Все позиции появятся на сайте inmw.ru завтра в 14:00 ❤️

38💘35💋8

3 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈2,960 views192 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Надеюсь вы успели стать чоколатками, потому что у меня для вас тут такоооое 😋

106💋46💘40

13 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC≈4,760 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

-20% на всю коллекцию INMW DOUBLE! Повтора позиций больше не будет, размеров осталось совсем немного, успевайте сделать заказ 😋 Топ INMW DOUBLE: 2650₽ > 2120₽ Леггинсы INMW DOUBLE: 2200₽ > 1760₽ Шорты INMW DOUBLE: 1900₽ > 1520₽ Найдете все в разделе «распродажа» ❤️

19💋8💘7

12 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC≈3,550 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На сайте большое пополнение недостающих размеров! ❤️ По многочисленным просьбам шорты MOTION в оттенке хаки вновь доступны к покупке; Топ ELEGIA в розовом оттенке вновь в наличии в неуловимых XS и S размерах; Рашгард INMW в ванильном оттенке вновь доступен в размере XS-S (повторов больше не будет 💔); Пополнились все базовые оттенки леггинсов и шорт в размерах XS и S! Вторая часть летнего дропа будет в конце июля

14💋5💘5

30 May 2026, 12:29 UTC≈5,330 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Призываю вас к покупке этого сочетания как минимум потому что шорты в ограниченном количестве и повтора не будет 😁🤌🏻 Топ ELEGIA - XS/S/M/L (2.800₽) Шорты SEAMLESS - S/M (1.900₽)

35💘30💋5

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @inmotionwearr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“INMW” (@inmotionwearr), 6,192 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inmotionwearr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.