Это мне для сюжетов, когда буду думать как обозвать

Channel
Inmagimentt
@inmagiment
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001810247528 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inmagiment |
| Description | So welcome home for broken hearts! Ночные бредни, [among the mud], критика от диванного критика и др. Присутствует ненормативная лексика. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inmagiment |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 10 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 10 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 50.0%
- avg views ÷ 10 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (30 April 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 67
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 8
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Бляха, мои сюжеты поудаляли схуяли-то, я негодую, теперь даже не знаю какие именно удалили
😢1
Для подачи на зинчик. Мое горе-партфолио. Тут в основном недавняя писанина вроде сюжетных идей, фанфиков и зарисовок. Моя личная рекомендация - "умер, но не насмерть".
Но я все же найду за что себя похвалить. Я не помню всей этой бредятины и иногда местами угарал с себя, так что не все так плохо☝️🏻. Как говорится — пиши пьяным, редактируй трезвым. Ауф.
Твою девизию за ногу, на сколько же я сам погряз в клишешках... Господи, да дай мне мозгов...
Мама, мне плохо, я не могу это читать... Еще больше усукабляет ситуацию то, что это писано мной же... Господи, я нихренашеньки не умею😇💔. Стыдно ли мне? Да. Продолжу ли я? Возможно.
Шла середина. Мне все еще не нравится. Думаю, я сопьюсь пока дочитаю...
Ну, в целом, Лоуренс и Коля действительно похожи в мотивах повадок, только вот Ларри в отличие от Коли пьет магний, и явно запивает его водкой. + не стремится к "светлой истине". Ему немного насрать на истину в принципе, его не особо волнует правильность его действий. Кстати, с 40 страницы я начал считать сколько раз упоминается тошнота. Я на 100 и в книжке уже... 11 стикеров. Ну, тут просто были главы без жгг, так б…
Шел 6й перерыв за 19 страниц. Клише на клише, это отвратительно. Худшая книга в моей библиотеке. Неужели я пишу настолько же ужасно?
Мне что угодно походу можно продать, если там будет что-то, имеющее хоть каплю, относящуюся к Коле...
Кстати мггшка внешне на колю смахивает...
Хочется ли это читать с первой строчки? Нет. Почему? Потому что описание. Меня всегда учили: хорошая книга засасывает с первой строчки и начинается с действия. Описание тоже должно идти через действие, иначе начинается "дуб из войны и мира". Я сейчас ту книгу читать буду только потому, что отдал за нее 1к россии. Мне неприятно видеть тут собственные ошибки и я уже начинаю прикапываться к редактуре. +это активный гет.…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @inmagiment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,040,096 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Inmagimentt” (@inmagiment), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inmagiment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.